Rosgen Stream Classification

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

The Rosgen

hydrologic and sediment relationships for a given stream type and its state; 3) provide mechanisms to extrapolate site-specific data to stream reaches having similar characteristics; and 4) provide a consistent frame of reference for communicating stream morphology and condition among a variety of disciplines and interested parties.[1]
These objectives are met through Rosgen's four hierarchical levels (I-IV) of river morphology.

Hierarchy of the Rosgen Stream Classification

Level I: Geomorphic Characterization

Level I categorize stream types into letters A - G based on their

topographic and landform maps, aerial imagery, and geospatial data.[3]

Level II: Morphological Description

Level II characterizes stream type by using numbers 1 - 6, in addition to letters A - G, to include the assessments of the channel cross-section, longitudinal profile, and plan-form pattern.[1] Cross-section measurements include a streams entrenchment ratio, width/depth ratio, and dominant substrate. The longitudinal and plan-form measurements consist of slope, stream bed features, sinuosity, and meander width ratio. Level II is a quantitative morphological assessment of the stream reach which provides greater detail from data collected in the field for the implementation into land management decisions.[3]

Level III: Assessment of Stream Condition and Departure from its Potential

Level III describes the existing condition of a stream as it relates to its stability, response potential, and function.[3] This level includes additional measurements such as, sediment supply, channel stability, and flow regime which further describe the condition or “state” of the stream.[3]

Level IV: Field Data Verification

Level IV verifies the process relationships inferred from the previous three levels of classification.

Manning's n values from measured velocity)[3]

Applications

The Rosgen Stream Classification is probably best applied as a communication tool to describe channel form.[4] Other uses for the Rosgen Stream Classification include fish habitat indices, surveys of riparian communities, stream restoration and mitigation, engineering, evaluating livestock grazing related to stream type, and the use of sediment and hydraulic data by stream type.

Limitations

Problems with the use of the Rosgen Stream Classification are encountered with identifying

bankfull dimensions, particularly in incising channels and with the mixing of bed and bank sediment into a single population.[4] Its use for engineering design and restoration may be flawed by ignoring some processes governed by force and resistance, and the imbalance between sediment supply and transporting power in unstable systems[4]

Limitations for Level II classification involve time dependence, uncertain applicability across physical environments, difficulty in identification of a true equilibrium condition, and uncertain process significance of classification criteria.[5] Implications of using the Rosgen Stream Classification, include: (1) acceptance of the limitations, (2) acceptance of the risk of classifying streams incorrectly, and (3) classification results may be used inappropriately[5]

References

  1. ^
    doi:10.1016/0341-8162(94)90001-9
    .
  2. ^ EPA, 2018. “Fundamentals of Rosgen Stream Classification System | Watershed Academy Web | US EPA.” n.d. Accessed May 6, 2018. https://cfpub.epa.gov/watertrain/moduleFrame.cfm?parent_object_id=1189 .
  3. ^ a b c d e f g Rosgen, David L. and H.L. Silvey 1996. “Applied River Morphology” Second Edition. Wildland Hydrology. Pagosa Springs, CO.
  4. ^
    doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2007.00091.x
    .
  5. ^
    doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2003.tb03683.x
    .
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rosgen_Stream_Classification&oldid=1186984975"