STEPS trial
The STEPS trial (an acronym for Study of Neurontin: Titrate to Efficacy, Profile of Safety) was a
Neurontin.[1] It is notable for being a seeding trial to promote that drug and for contributing to the drug companies loss in the court case Franklin v. Parke-Davis.[2][3][4]
Detailed documents were released due to
unblinded and the scientific validity of the trial was considered dubious by independent external sources.[2] Documents also revealed that the trial recruited 772 physician investigators, many with very limited research experience, provided inadequate training for investigators, and that company sales representatives were "directly involved in collecting and recording individual subject trial data".[2]
The STEPS study has been considered as an example of pharmaceutical marketing merging with research.[5]
Further reading
- Morrell, MJ (1999). "Dosing to efficacy with neurontin: the STEPS trial. Study of Titration to Effect Profile of Safety". Epilepsia. 40 Suppl 6: S23–6, discussion S73–4. PMID 10530679.
- Beran, R; Berkovic, S; Black, A; Danta, G; Dunne, J; Frasca, J; Grainger, K; Kilpatrick, C; McKenzie, R; McLaughlin, D; Schapel, G; Somerville, E (October 2001). "AUStralian study of titration to effect profile of safety (AUS-STEPS): high-dose gabapentin (neurontin) in partial seizures". Epilepsia. 42 (10): 1335–9. PMID 11737169.