Single domain (magnetic)
In
History
Early theories of
Definitions of a single-domain particle
Early investigators pointed out that a single-domain particle could be defined in more than one way.[4] Perhaps most commonly, it is implicitly defined as a particle that is in a single-domain state throughout the hysteresis cycle, including during the transition between two such states. This is the type of particle that is modeled by the Stoner–Wohlfarth model. However, it might be in a single-domain state except during reversal. Often particles are considered single-domain if their saturation remanence is consistent with the single-domain state. More recently it was realized that a particle's state could be single-domain for some range of magnetic fields and then change continuously into a non-uniform state.[5]
Another common definition of single-domain particle is one in which the single-domain state has the lowest energy of all possible states (see below).
Single domain hysteresis
If a particle is in the single-domain state, all of its internal magnetization is pointed in the same direction. It therefore has the largest possible magnetic moment for a particle of that size and composition. The magnitude of this moment is , where is the volume of the particle and is the
The magnetization at any point in a ferromagnet can only change by rotation. If there is more than one magnetic domain, the transition between one domain and its neighbor involves a rotation of the magnetization to form a domain wall. Domain walls move easily within the magnet and have a low coercivity. By contrast, a particle that is single-domain in all magnetic fields changes its state by rotation of all the magnetization as a unit. This results in a much larger coercivity.
The most widely used theory for hysteresis in single-domain particle is the Stoner–Wohlfarth model. This applies to a particle with uniaxial magnetocrystalline anisotropy.
Limits on the single-domain size
Experimentally, it is observed that though the magnitude of the magnetization is uniform throughout a homogeneous specimen at uniform temperature, the direction of the magnetization is in general not uniform, but varies from one region to another, on a scale corresponding to visual observations with a microscope. Uniform of direction is attained only by applying a field, or by choosing as a specimen, a body which is itself of microscopic dimensions (a fine particle).
Although pure single-domain particles (mathematically) exist for some special geometries only, for most ferromagnets a state of quasi-uniformity of magnetization is achieved when the diameter of the particle is in between about 25 nanometers and 80 nanometers.
Lower limit: superparamagnetism
Upper limit: transition to multiple domains
As size of a ferromagnet increases, the single-domain state incurs an increasing energy cost because of the
Notes
- ^ Brown 1978
- ^ Wohlfarth 1959
- ^ Stoner & Wohlfarth 1948
- ^ a b Brown 1958
- ^ Newell & Merrill 1998
- .
- doi:10.1063/1.340280.
- S2CID 122576188.
- .
- S2CID 254059498.
- PMID 28358051.
- .
- ^ Morrish & Yu 1955
- ^ Butler & Banerjee 1975
- ^ Aharoni 2001
References
- Aharoni, Amikam (2001). "Brown's "fundamental theorem" revisited". .
- .
- ISBN 0-88275-665-6.
- Butler, Robert F.; Banerjee, S. K. (1975). "Theoretical single-domain grain size range in magnetite and titanomagnetite". .
- Morrish, A. H.; Yu, S. P. (1955). "Dependence of the coercive force on the density of some iron oxide powders". .
- Newell, A. J.; Merrill, R. T. (1998). "The curling nucleation mode in a ferromagnetic cube". doi:10.1063/1.368661.
- Stoner, E. C.; Wohlfarth, E. P. (1948). "A mechanism of magnetic hysteresis in heterogeneous alloys". .
- Wohlfarth, E. P. (1959). "Hard magnetic materials". .