Sisson Documents

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

The Sisson Documents (

Bolshevik leaders were agents directed by the German Empire
to bring about Russia's withdrawal from the conflict.

Their authenticity was debated even as they were widely publicized to discredit the

forgeries.[2] Various analyses however, including that of Kennan did not exclude the possibility that the Bolsheviks received some German logistical or financial support up to 1917, as opposed to following the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk
in 1918.

History

Edgar Sisson, 1919

Sisson had worked as a reporter for the

US Congress.[4]

He believed his greatest success came when he acquired the Sisson Documents in Petrograd in the spring of 1918.[5] Sisson returned to the US in May and became head of the CPI's Foreign Section in July 1918.[6] His report describing the documents reached Wilson on May 9, 1918, and the administration released them to the American press on September 15. Most of the press reported without question that the German General Staff had hired Lenin and Trotsky and discredited the Russian revolutionaries.[7]

The

New York Times reported the CPI's version of the documents in September, detailed the damaging charges, and claimed:[9]

"that the present heads of the Bolshevist government – Lenin and Trotsky and their associates – are German agents... that the Bolshevist revolt was arranged for by the German Great General Staff and financed by the German Imperial Bank and other German financial institutions... that the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk was a betrayal of the Russian people by German agents, Lenin and Trotsky; that a German-picked "commander" was chosen to defend Petrograd against the Germans; that German officers have been secretly received by the Bolshevist government as military advisers, as spies upon the embassies of Russia's allies, as officers in the Russian army, and as directors of the Bolshevist military, foreign and domestic policy... that the present Bolshevist government is not a Russian government at all, but a German government, acting solely in the interests of Germany, and betraying the Russian people, as it betrays Russia's natural allies, for the benefit of the Imperial German Government alone. And they show also that the Bolshevist leaders... have equally betrayed the working classes of Russia whom they pretend to represent."

The CPI produced a pamphlet based on the Sisson Documents called The German-Bolshevik Conspiracy and distributed 137,000 copies of it. It contained translations, a number of reproductions of the documents, and an analysis made by two prominent scholars for the National Board for Historical Service, J. Franklin Jameson, and Samuel Harper,[10] that determined that most of the documents were genuine, even if a few were questionable.[11] Sisson defended the documents as genuine in his 1931 memoir[12] and again in his 1947 memoir.[13]

After

German Foreign Office seemed to confirm that Germany had financed the Bolsheviks but did not address the authenticity of the Sisson Documents.[8][14]

In 1956, George F. Kennan claimed that the Sisson Documents were forgeries in an article.[2] The arguments were largely technical, "ranging from the use of suspicious letterheads and seals, to language discrepancies, to the presence of defunct dating systems..., to apparently forged signatures, and... evidence that the same typewriter had been used to prepare... documents emanating from different offices."[15] Kennan also mentioned logistic arguments. Kennan noted that it was possible the Bolsheviks "received clandestine subsidies from German sources during the summer and early autumn of 1917" but not after the "November Revolution," when the "disintegration of the Russian armed forces–was now an accomplished fact." By then, the Bolsheviks had their own funding sources, and Kennan argued the projected German aid would not have led to subservience on the part of the Bolsheviks.[16]

His analysis of the decades-old controversy attracted little public attention, but it proved more important within the scholarly community. It challenged "the growing tendency in academia and government to conflate all forms of totalitarianism, in particular Nazism and Communism" and questioned the wisdom of scholarship's alliance with national interests.[15]

Kennan's work was expanded in 1990 by Soviet-Russian historian Professor Gennady Sobolev. Among the errors and inaccuracies found indicating falsification of documents, a few basic examples can be considered:[17]

According to John Maxwell Hamilton and Meghan McCune, "As with all effective disinformation, their power lay in their plausibility. The documents’ authors enhanced their forgeries with facts. Germans did help the Bolsheviks, funneling millions of Deutsche marks to them during the war. But, as one diplomat noted, the Bolsheviks would have accepted money from anyone. More important, the Bolsheviks sought to foment a communist revolution in Germany as soon as they could."[18]

See also

References

  1. ^ Alan Axelrod, Selling the Great War: The Making of American Propaganda (NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009)
  2. ^ a b George F. Kennan, "The Sisson Documents," Journal of Modern History, v. 28 (1956), 130-54; Axelrod, 166, 236n20
  3. ^ Axelrod, 85
  4. ^ Axelrod, 189, 194, 203-4; George Creel, Rebel at Large: Recollections of Fifty Crowded Years (NY: G.P. Putnam's Sons, 1947), 176
  5. ^ Axelrod, 205; Creel, Rebel, 179-80; New York Times: "Sisson Book Says Germans Paid Reds," April 17, 1931, accessed February 24, 2010
  6. ^ Axelrod, 189; Creel, Rebel, 180
  7. ^ Axelrod, 205
  8. ^ a b Encyclopedia of Espionage, Intelligence, and Security: Martin J. Manning, "Document Forgery", accessed February 24, 2010
  9. ^ New York Times: "Documents Prove Lenine and Trotsky Hired by Germans," September 15, 1918, accessed February 24, 2010
  10. American Historical Review
    . Harper was professor of Russian language and institutions at the University of Chicago. See Robin, Scandals and Scoundrels, 1.
  11. ^ Axelrod, 165-6; Manning, "Document Forgery"
  12. ^ Edgar Sisson, One Hundred Red Days: A Personal Chronicle of the Bolshevik Revolution (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1931)
  13. ^ Creel, Rebel, 181-5
  14. JSTOR 2625787
    .
  15. ^ a b Robin, Ron Theodore (2004). Scandals and Scoundrels: Seven Cases That Shook the Academy. University of California Press. pp. 1–3.
  16. OCLC 894998141.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link
    )
  17. ISBN 5-94849-016-5
    .
  18. ^ Hamilton, John Maxwell; McCune, Meghan Menard (13 September 2018). "Lessons from White House disinformation a century ago: 'It's dangerous to believe your own propaganda'". The Conversation. Retrieved 2021-09-01.

Bibliography

Newspapers

  • New York Times, September 19, 1918

Books and articles

  • Axelrod, Alan (2009). Selling the Great War: The Making of American Propaganda. NY: Palgrave Macmillan.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: publisher location (link)
  • Creel, George (1947). Rebel at Large: Recollections of Fifty Crowded Years. NY: G.P. Putnam's Sons.
  • Sisson, Edgar (1931). One Hundred Red Days: A Personal Chronicle of the Bolshevik Revolution. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Kennan, George F. (1956). "The Sisson Documents". Journal of Modern History. 28 (2): 130–154.
    S2CID 144508744
    .
  • John Maxwell Hamilton, Manipulating the Masses: Woodrow Wilson and the Birth of American Propaganda [1]
  • Manning, Martin J. Encyclopedia of Espionage, Intelligence, and Security: Document Forgery.
  • Robin, Ron Theodore (2004). Scandals and Scoundrels: Seven Cases That Shook the Academy. University of California Press.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sisson_Documents&oldid=1292252158"