Smoothed octagon

The smoothed octagon is a region in the plane found by

that is tangent to the two sides adjacent to the corner and asymptotic to the sides adjacent to these.

Construction

The hyperbola that forms each corner of the smoothed octagon is tangent to two sides of a regular octagon, and asymptotic to the two adjacent to these.^[3] The following details apply to a regular octagon of circumradius ${\displaystyle {\sqrt {2}}}$ with its centre at the point ${\displaystyle (2+{\sqrt {2}},0)}$ and one vertex at the point ${\displaystyle (2,0)}$. For two constants ${\displaystyle \ell ={\sqrt {2}}-1}$ and ${\displaystyle m=(1/2)^{1/4}}$, the hyperbola is given by the equation

or the equivalent parameterization (for the right-hand branch only)

for the portion of the hyperbola that forms the corner, given by the range of parameter values

The lines of the octagon tangent to the hyperbola are ${\displaystyle y=\pm \left({\sqrt {2}}+1\right)\left(x-2\right)}$, and the lines asymptotic to the hyperbola are simply ${\displaystyle y=\pm \ell x}$.

Packing

For every centrally symmetric convex planar set, including the smoothed octagon, the maximum packing density is achieved by a lattice packing, in which unrotated copies of the shape are translated by the vectors of a lattice.^[4] The smoothed octagon achieves its maximum packing density, not just for a single packing, but for a 1-parameter family. All of these are lattice packings.^[5] The smoothed octagon has a maximum packing density given by^[2][3]

This is lower than the maximum packing density of circles, which is^[3]

The maximum known packing density of the ordinary regular octagon is

also slightly less than the maximum packing density of circles, but higher than that of the smoothed octagon.^[6]

Reinhardt's conjecture that the smoothed octagon has the lowest maximum packing density of all centrally symmetric convex shapes in the plane remains unsolved. As a partial result,

If central symmetry is not required, the regular heptagon is conjectured to have even lower packing density, but neither its packing density nor its optimality have been proven. In three dimensions, Ulam's packing conjecture states that no convex shape has a lower maximum packing density than the ball.^[5]

References

External links

• Packing smoothed octagons. John Baez, Visual Insight, AMS Blogs, 2014.
• The thinnest densest two-dimensional packing?. Peter Scholl, 2001.