Social multiplier effect
The social multiplier effect is a term used in
For example, we know that health outcomes strongly correlate with education level. Given the social multiplier effect, we know that in the aggregate, if a poorly educated individual moves into a highly educated area they will experience some of the positive health effects associated with being more educated.
Examples
Researchers Scott E. Carrell, Mark L. Hoekstra, and James E. West have shown that one's friends' fitness affects one's own fitness. They find that "each out-of-shape individual creates two additional out-of-shape individuals through their social interactions."[4] Another researcher Jeffery Fletcher has found that a 10 percent increase in the number of students who smoke at a high school increases the chances another student will smoke by about 3 percent.[5] Xiaodong Liu et al. have found that there is a multiplier effect for juvenile delinquency in schools.[3] Additionally, in another article Carrell, West, and Frederick V. Malmstrom find that peer cheating increases the likelihood that an individual will cheat.[6]
The social multiplier effect is of particular concern to researchers in economic geography. It is well documented that factors like income and education have strong positive correlations with many aspects of health. This is important because the geographic distribution of income and education is becoming increasingly stratified.[7] For example, since 1980, on average, cities that had high levels of college educated workers are becoming increasingly college educated whereas those who had low levels are becoming increasingly less educated. The same trend applies to income.[8] Consequently, as the distribution of income and education level becomes more disparate, many low income regions lose out on the social multiplier benefits they once enjoyed.
Measurement challenges
Using only
- endogenous effects, in which group behavior affects individual behavior directly;
- exogenous effects or contextual effects, in which exogenously determined characteristics of the group affect individual behavior;
- correlated effects, in which group members only behave similarly because they have individual characteristics in common.
The three effects cannot be distinguished if the researcher does not know how groups are constructed, but only endogenous effects can produce social multipliers. Though Manski wrote that the reflection problem can only be overcome if the researcher has information on how individuals enter into groups, such as in an experimental setting,[9][10] more recent work has highlighted alternative ways of overcoming the problem in common settings.[11]
See also
- Economic development
- Economic geography
- Local multiplier effect
- Network effects
- Spillover (experiment)
References
- ^ Sheinkman, José. Social Interactions. Princeton. Retrieved on 25 February 2016. https://www.princeton.edu/~joses/wp/socialinteractions.pdf
- ^ Moretti, Enrico. The New Geography of Jobs. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt: 2012. p. 101.
- ^ a b Xiandong Liu et al. "Social Multiplier versus Social Norms: What Matters Most for Outcomes?" Center For Economic Policy Research: 2013. Retrieved on 25 February 2016. http://www.voxeu.org/article/social-multiplier-versus-social-norms-what-matters-most-outcomes.
- ISSN 0047-2727.
- PMID 19382102.
- SSRN 842224.
- ^ Moretti, Enrico. The New Geography of Jobs. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt: 2012. p. 101–102.
- ^ Moretti, Enrico. The New Geography of Jobs. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt: 2012. p. 102.
- ^ Ramrattan, Lall; Szenberg, Michael. "Reflection Problem". International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences.
- S2CID 154470582.
- S2CID 2493467.
Further reading
- Dahl, Gordon B.; Løken, Katrine V.; Mogstad, Magne (2014-07-01). "Peer Effects in Program Participation". American Economic Review. 104 (7). American Economic Association: 2049–2074. ISSN 0002-8282.
- Gibbons, Stephen; Telhaj, Shqiponja (2015-02-16). "Peer Effects: Evidence from Secondary School Transition in England" (PDF). Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. 78 (4). Wiley: 548–575. S2CID 1769393.
- ISSN 1542-4766.
- S2CID 1559596.