Social problem-solving
 | This article is written like a personal reflection, personal essay, or argumentative essay that states a Wikipedia editor's personal feelings or presents an original argument about a topic. (December 2013) |
Social problem-solving, in its most basic form, is defined as problem solving as it occurs in the natural environment.[1] More specifically it refers to the cognitive-behavioral process in which one works to find adaptive ways of coping with everyday situations that are considered problematic. This process in self-directed, conscious, effortful, cogent, and focused.[2] Adaptive social problem-solving skills are known to be effective coping skills in an array of stressful situations. Social problem-solving consists of two major processes.[1] One of these processes is known as problem orientation. Problem orientation is defined as the schemas one holds about problems in everyday life and ones assessment of their ability to solve said problems.[1][3]
The problem orientation may be positive and constructive to the problem solving process or negative and therefore dysfunctional in the process. Problem-solving proper is known as the second major process in social problem-solving. This process refers to the skills and techniques one uses to search for solutions and applying these skills to find the best solutions available. This model has been expanded by McFall[4] and Liberman and colleagues.[5] In these variations social problem-solving is considered to be a multi-step process including the adoption of a general orientation, defining the problem, brainstorming for solutions, decision making, and follow up stages.[6]
Process
Based on the above model, it is hypothesized that a positive problem orientation leads to rational problem-solving skills.[7] A rational problem-solving style is defined as a sensible, thoughtful, and methodical application of effective problem-solving skills.[7][8] This, in turn, is most likely to result in positive outcomes and an exit from the problem solving process for this particular instance.[7] When a negative outcome occurs, a person with rational problem solving skills is more likely to begin the cycle of problem-solving again. This time with the intent of finding a more appropriate solution or to redefine the problem. On the other hand, a negative problem solving orientation is likely to lead towards impulsive-careless or avoidant problem-solving styles. An impulsive-careless style is defined as narrowed, rash, thoughtless, speedy, and incomplete attempts at problem solving.[7][8] An avoidance style to problem-solving is characterized by inaction, procrastination, and attempts to shift responsibility to others. Both of these styles are hypothesized to lead towards negative outcomes more often in the Social Problem-Solving Process.[7] When negative outcomes occur, a person with an impulsive-careless or avoidant skill set is more likely to give up.
Benefits and deficits
Social problem-solving involves various abilities and skills which lead to adaptive outcomes for several different populations.
Therapy and intervention
Social problem-solving theory and processes have been used in intervention and therapeutic processes. Participants were shown to improve in most areas of measured social problem-solving skills.
References
- ^ a b c D'Zurilla, T.J. (1986). Problem-Solving therapy: A social competence approach to clinical intervention. New York: Srpinger.
- ^ PMID 9840781.
- ^ .
- ^ McFall, R.M. (1982). "A review and reformulation of the concept of social sills". Behavioral Assessment. 4: 1–33.
- PMID 3810067.
- ^ PMID 8040506.
- ^ a b c d e Chang, E.C., D'Zurilla, T.J., Sanna, I.J. (2004). Social Problem-Solving: Theory, Research, and Training. Washington D.C.: American Psychological Association.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ S2CID 22720185.
- ^ PMID 1753336.
- PMID 19775677.
- PMID 8450097.
- PMID 18229980.
- .
- .
- ^ PMID 3700806.
- S2CID 2601627.
- S2CID 25000167.
- doi:10.1002/cbm.401.