User contributions for 2A00:23C4:20D:1300:6126:AED1:A1CB:B1E

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

20:2520:25, 23 September 2017 diff hist +105‎ Talk:Anders Behring Breivik ‎ →‎he lost his appeal in 2017 re his human rights
20:2420:24, 23 September 2017 diff hist +161‎ Talk:Anders Behring Breivik ‎ →‎he lost his appeal in 2017 re his human rights
20:2020:20, 23 September 2017 diff hist +146‎ Talk:Anders Behring Breivik ‎ →‎he lost his appeal in 2017 re his human rights: new section
20:0720:07, 23 September 2017 diff hist −528‎ Anders Behring Breivik ‎ source does not say this at all, and where did he get this made-up money from?
19:0719:07, 23 September 2017 diff hist −16‎ Pol Pot ‎No edit summary
19:0619:06, 23 September 2017 diff hist +89‎ Pol Pot ‎No edit summary
19:0519:05, 23 September 2017 diff hist −6,642‎ Criticism of Coca-Cola ‎ see talk please
19:0419:04, 23 September 2017 diff hist −6,642‎ Criticism of Coca-Cola ‎ see talk please, you can libel a firm without proof. All I am asking for is that
19:0219:02, 23 September 2017 diff hist −6,642‎ Criticism of Coca-Cola ‎ find citations before you post nonsense
17:3017:30, 23 September 2017 diff hist +219‎ Talk:Criticism of Coca-Cola ‎ →‎dont revert
17:3017:30, 23 September 2017 diff hist +219‎ User talk:2A00:23C4:20D:1300:6126:AED1:A1CB:B1E ‎No edit summary
17:2717:27, 23 September 2017 diff hist +29‎ User talk:Sjö ‎ →‎Coke: new section
17:2717:27, 23 September 2017 diff hist +296‎ Talk:Criticism of Coca-Cola ‎ →‎dont revert: new section
17:2417:24, 23 September 2017 diff hist −6,124‎ Criticism of Coca-Cola ‎ NO, you need to provide proper citations, then you can add, it doesnt work the way you say!?
17:2417:24, 23 September 2017 diff hist −518‎ Criticism of Coca-Cola ‎ the Judge said Coke werent involved at all, hardly criticism
17:2117:21, 23 September 2017 diff hist +290‎ User talk:Catlemur ‎ →‎coca cola: new section
17:1917:19, 23 September 2017 diff hist −6,124‎ Criticism of Coca-Cola ‎ not proper sources, find ones that are allowed by Wiki if you can and then you can add this again
17:0817:08, 23 September 2017 diff hist −4,212‎ Criticism of Coca-Cola ‎ there literally isnt even 1 citation for all these claims, please do not re-insert unless you can prove what is written Tag: section blanking
17:0217:02, 23 September 2017 diff hist −668‎ Criticism of Coca-Cola ‎ no citation at all for this stupid claim Tag: section blanking
17:0117:01, 23 September 2017 diff hist −496‎ Criticism of Coca-Cola ‎ not relevant
17:0017:00, 23 September 2017 diff hist −748‎ Criticism of Coca-Cola ‎ needs citation

23 September 2017