User contributions for BorkNein
A user with 119 edits. Account created on 1 July 2020.
16 July 2020
- 18:1018:10, 16 July 2020 diff hist +1,194 User talk:BorkNein →Comrades: new section
- 17:3217:32, 16 July 2020 diff hist +83 User talk:BorkNein →July 2020
- 17:3017:30, 16 July 2020 diff hist −1,276 User talk:BorkNein No edit summary
- 17:2817:28, 16 July 2020 diff hist +2,491 User talk:BorkNein →July 2020
- 15:3815:38, 16 July 2020 diff hist +177 Talk:Daily Mail →Discussion
- 09:0509:05, 16 July 2020
diff hist −472
User talk:BorkNein
Undid revision 967949796 by Alexis Jazz (talk)
Undo
- 09:0309:03, 16 July 2020 diff hist +496 Talk:Daily Mail →RfC: sourcing of "widely criticized for its unreliability": close and refile with different questions
- 08:0108:01, 16 July 2020 diff hist +391 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Guy Macon
- 06:4106:41, 16 July 2020 diff hist +237 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Guy Macon
- 06:2906:29, 16 July 2020 diff hist +274 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Guy Macon
- 05:3805:38, 16 July 2020 diff hist +75 Talk:Daily Mail →Threaded discussion
- 05:3705:37, 16 July 2020 diff hist +1,509 Talk:Daily Mail →Threaded discussion: move and reformat my posts Guy moved so they actually makes sense in a section allegedly for threaded topics, and append further notes
- 04:5604:56, 16 July 2020 diff hist +573 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Guy Macon
- 03:4403:44, 16 July 2020 diff hist −2 Talk:Daily Mail →Survey: pending a resolution of the edit warring complaint, one thing I am quite certain of, is that I hold the right to format my individual post how I choose, and this was my choice. This
- 03:3403:34, 16 July 2020 diff hist +1,168 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Guy Macon: new section
- 02:0202:02, 16 July 2020 diff hist +261 Talk:Daily Mail →Survey
- 02:0002:00, 16 July 2020 diff hist +1 Talk:Daily Mail →Threaded discussion
- 01:5901:59, 16 July 2020 diff hist +2,803 Talk:Daily Mail →Threaded discussion
- 00:3900:39, 16 July 2020 diff hist +936 Talk:Daily Mail →Survey
- 00:2600:26, 16 July 2020 diff hist +77 Talk:Daily Mail →Threaded discussion
- 00:2500:25, 16 July 2020 diff hist +522 Talk:Daily Mail →RfC: sourcing of "widely criticized for its unreliability"
- 00:1900:19, 16 July 2020 diff hist +495 User talk:Guy Macon No edit summary
- 00:1600:16, 16 July 2020 diff hist +83 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:Guy Macon reported by User:BorkNein (Result: )
- 00:1500:15, 16 July 2020 diff hist −24 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:Guy Macon reported by User:BorkNein (Result: )
- 00:1000:10, 16 July 2020 diff hist +158 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:Guy Macon reported by User:BorkNein (Result: )
- 00:0900:09, 16 July 2020 diff hist +108 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:Guy Macon reported by User:BorkNein (Result: )
- 00:0700:07, 16 July 2020 diff hist 0 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:Guy Macon reported by User:BorkNein (Result: )
- 00:0700:07, 16 July 2020 diff hist −8 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:Guy Macon reported by User:BorkNein (Result: )
- 00:0600:06, 16 July 2020 diff hist +1,226 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:Guy Macon reported by User:BorkNein (Result: )
15 July 2020
- 23:5423:54, 15 July 2020 diff hist +55 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User: reported by User:BorkNein (Result: )
- 23:5123:51, 15 July 2020 diff hist +78 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User: reported by User:BorkNein (Result: )
- 23:4823:48, 15 July 2020 diff hist +512 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User: reported by User:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}} (Result: ): new section
- 23:4523:45, 15 July 2020
diff hist −384
User talk:BorkNein
Undid revision 967887982 by Guy Macon (talk)
Undo
- 21:1821:18, 15 July 2020 diff hist −42 Talk:Daily Mail restore format chosen by me, the RfC filer, do not falsely claim to be "fixing" things you already know from extensive discussion on this very page, are matters of optional preference
- 19:2219:22, 15 July 2020 diff hist +288 User talk:Peter Gulutzan →Notification: new section
- 19:2119:21, 15 July 2020 diff hist +288 User talk:Hzh →Notification: new section
- 19:2019:20, 15 July 2020 diff hist +288 User talk:Buidhe →Notification: new section
- 19:2019:20, 15 July 2020 diff hist +288 User talk:Masem →Notification: new section
- 19:1919:19, 15 July 2020 diff hist +288 User talk:-sche →Notification: new section
- 19:1919:19, 15 July 2020 diff hist +288 User talk:The Four Deuces →Notification: new section
- 19:1719:17, 15 July 2020 diff hist +288 User talk:ReconditeRodent →Notification: new section
- 19:1219:12, 15 July 2020 diff hist +3,963 Talk:Daily Mail No edit summary
- 12:1312:13, 15 July 2020 diff hist +1,728 User talk:Jasper Deng →Your warning regarding the three revert rule
14 July 2020
- 19:3419:34, 14 July 2020 diff hist +1 User talk:Jasper Deng →Your warning regarding the three revert rule
- 19:3419:34, 14 July 2020 diff hist +575 User talk:Jasper Deng →Your warning regarding the three revert rule
- 18:1318:13, 14 July 2020 diff hist +1,792 Talk:Daily Mail →The question
- 17:5117:51, 14 July 2020 diff hist 0 Talk:Daily Mail No edit summary
- 17:4917:49, 14 July 2020 diff hist +157 Talk:Daily Mail →Request for comments
- 17:4617:46, 14 July 2020 diff hist +809 User talk:Jasper Deng →Your warning regarding the three revert rule
- 10:5110:51, 14 July 2020 diff hist +103 Talk:Daily Mail →How to write a properly formatted RfC with a brief and neutrally worded question
