User contributions for Cap-Saint-Martin
A user with 58 edits. Account created on 8 March 2013.
21 March 2013
- 19:4819:48, 21 March 2013 diff hist +10,438 User talk:Cap-Saint-Martin Chapter and verse before removing that again please
- 19:3919:39, 21 March 2013 diff hist 0 User talk:Cap-Saint-Martin →A very disturbing development indeed: fixed typo
- 19:3819:38, 21 March 2013 diff hist +525 User talk:Cap-Saint-Martin →A very disturbing development indeed: that too
- 19:3719:37, 21 March 2013 diff hist +62 User talk:Cap-Saint-Martin →A very disturbing development indeed
- 19:3619:36, 21 March 2013 diff hist +153 User talk:Cap-Saint-Martin →A very disturbing development indeed
- 19:3519:35, 21 March 2013 diff hist +848 User talk:Cap-Saint-Martin Undid revision 546062481 by Toddst1 (talk) I thought this was my talk page
- 19:2619:26, 21 March 2013 diff hist +397 User talk:Cap-Saint-Martin →A very disturbing development indeed
- 19:1319:13, 21 March 2013 diff hist +331 User talk:Cap-Saint-Martin →A very disturbing development indeed: new section
- 18:5718:57, 21 March 2013 diff hist +849 Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DeFacto →Comments by other users: wrong again
20 March 2013
- 23:2223:22, 20 March 2013 diff hist +361 User talk:Rschen7754 →Any advice would be welcome: info
- 22:5322:53, 20 March 2013 diff hist −84 Second Severn Crossing Undid revision 545800845 by Martinvl (talk) clumsy change which removed a reference for other content in the section
- 22:4622:46, 20 March 2013 diff hist −3 Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DeFacto →Comments by other users: fix
- 22:4522:45, 20 March 2013 diff hist −4 Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DeFacto →Comments by other users: fix
- 22:4222:42, 20 March 2013 diff hist +2,422 Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DeFacto →Comments by other users: how much more trouble is he going to be allowed to make?
- 21:2921:29, 20 March 2013 diff hist −68 Second Severn Crossing →Design: contradicts sourced content in previous section
- 21:2721:27, 20 March 2013 diff hist +202 Second Severn Crossing →Setting: adjusted and added source
19 March 2013
- 21:1821:18, 19 March 2013 diff hist +222 Talk:Second Severn Crossing →Cap-Saint_Martin's changes 19-March-2012: progress
- 21:1621:16, 19 March 2013 diff hist −22 Second Severn Crossing →Environmental impact: that is a summary of the following paragraphs - does it not reflect the content accurately?
- 21:1121:11, 19 March 2013 diff hist +256 Talk:Second Severn Crossing →Cap-Saint_Martin's changes 19-March-2012: unacceptable
- 21:0921:09, 19 March 2013 diff hist −406 Second Severn Crossing Undid revision 545515883 by Martinvl (talk) the excuse for reversing the improvements was derisory
- 20:5620:56, 19 March 2013 diff hist −2 Second Severn Crossing →Finances: closed gap
- 20:5520:55, 19 March 2013 diff hist −542 Second Severn Crossing →Finances: removed duplication
- 20:5420:54, 19 March 2013 diff hist −16 Second Severn Crossing Moved one section into a better context and renamed another
- 20:4920:49, 19 March 2013 diff hist +170 Talk:Second Severn Crossing →Content of article: better
- 20:4720:47, 19 March 2013 diff hist +154 Second Severn Crossing →Environmental concerns: what is currently supported
- 20:1620:16, 19 March 2013 diff hist +555 Talk:Second Severn Crossing →Content of article: is there even an environment story to tell?
- 19:4919:49, 19 March 2013 diff hist +569 Talk:Second Severn Crossing →Content of article: read it again
- 19:3719:37, 19 March 2013 diff hist +2 Talk:Second Severn Crossing →Content of article
- 19:3419:34, 19 March 2013 diff hist +554 Talk:Second Severn Crossing →Content of article: none of it should be kept
- 19:1719:17, 19 March 2013 diff hist +909 Talk:Second Severn Crossing →Content of article: biased and unrepresentative
18 March 2013
- 21:4721:47, 18 March 2013 diff hist +271 User talk:Rschen7754 →Any advice would be welcome: I'm out
- 21:3821:38, 18 March 2013 diff hist +229 User talk:Rschen7754 →Any advice would be welcome: withdraw?
- 21:3021:30, 18 March 2013 diff hist +292 User talk:Rschen7754 →Any advice would be welcome: additionally
- 21:2721:27, 18 March 2013 diff hist +1,122 User talk:Rschen7754 →Any advice would be welcome: new section
- 21:0021:00, 18 March 2013 diff hist +711 Talk:Second Severn Crossing →Change of primary units: needs a consensus
- 18:4318:43, 18 March 2013 diff hist +357 Talk:Second Severn Crossing →Change of primary units: please confirm
17 March 2013
- 22:4522:45, 17 March 2013 diff hist +1,012 Talk:Second Severn Crossing →Change of primary units: substantial reason now required for the change
- 09:3009:30, 17 March 2013 diff hist +549 User talk:Cap-Saint-Martin →3RR warning: we need consensus for such a change
- 09:0809:08, 17 March 2013 diff hist +877 User talk:Cap-Saint-Martin →3RR warning: the onus is on you
- 08:5508:55, 17 March 2013 diff hist +578 Talk:Second Severn Crossing →Change of primary units: we need a consensus
16 March 2013
- 16:1716:17, 16 March 2013 diff hist +431 User talk:Cap-Saint-Martin →3RR warning: you could restore it yourself of course
- 16:1116:11, 16 March 2013 diff hist +549 Talk:Second Severn Crossing →Change of primary units: we need valid reasons for such a fundamental change
- 15:2715:27, 16 March 2013 diff hist +551 Talk:Second Severn Crossing →Change of primary units: what do you disagree with?
- 15:0515:05, 16 March 2013 diff hist +375 Talk:Second Severn Crossing →Change of primary units: new section
- 15:0215:02, 16 March 2013 diff hist −734 Second Severn Crossing Undid revision 544656683 by Bob Re-born (talk) restored the status quo whilst discussions proceed
- 14:5014:50, 16 March 2013 diff hist −734 Second Severn Crossing Undid revision 544656045 by Bob Re-born (talk) we need to discuss such a bold change as a switch of primary units
- 14:4314:43, 16 March 2013 diff hist −734 Second Severn Crossing Unit order was ok - change them to feet by all means, but don't swap them around without discussion
9 March 2013
- 22:1322:13, 9 March 2013 diff hist +988 Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Road junction lists →Location columns: ceremonial counties are clearly defined in the UK
8 March 2013
- 18:2218:22, 8 March 2013 diff hist +230 Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Road junction lists →Is it worth continuing this exercise: why not use them then?
- 17:2417:24, 8 March 2013 diff hist +143 User:Cap-Saint-Martin No edit summary