User contributions for Dimasgomez
Appearance
A user with 18 edits. Account created on 21 December 2015.
29 December 2021
- 00:1700:17, 29 December 2021 diff hist +426 Talk:Yoga Sutras of Patanjali →Seriously?
- 00:0200:02, 29 December 2021 diff hist +92 Talk:Yoga Sutras of Patanjali →Seriously?
- 00:0200:02, 29 December 2021 diff hist +111 Talk:Yoga Sutras of Patanjali →Seriously?: new section
28 December 2021
- 23:3923:39, 28 December 2021 diff hist +3,137 Yoga Sutras of Patanjali Edited opening description about the text with quotations and references. Tags: Reverted Visual edit
- 22:0822:08, 28 December 2021 diff hist +182 m Patanjali →Yoga Sūtras Tags: Reverted Visual edit
- 21:5921:59, 28 December 2021 diff hist +212 m Patanjali →Yoga Sūtras Tags: Reverted Visual edit
- 21:4721:47, 28 December 2021 diff hist +60 m Patanjali →Yoga Sūtras Tag: Reverted
- 21:4221:42, 28 December 2021 diff hist +357 m Patanjali →Yoga Sūtras Tag: Reverted
- 21:1621:16, 28 December 2021 diff hist +69 m Patanjali →Yoga Sūtras: minor Tags: Reverted Visual edit
- 20:5920:59, 28 December 2021 diff hist −59 m Patanjali →Yoga Sūtras: Fixing minor issues with my contribution. Tags: Reverted Visual edit
- 20:3620:36, 28 December 2021 diff hist +1,613 Patanjali →Yoga Sūtra: Extra sources to fix some minor discrepancies about sutra as "aphorism" (stand-out phrase). Tag: Reverted
- 19:3519:35, 28 December 2021 diff hist +909 Talk:Sahasrara →Static center
21 December 2021
- 15:2015:20, 21 December 2021 diff hist +3 Talk:Atma Shatkam →Restructuring proposal
- 15:1715:17, 21 December 2021 diff hist +299 Talk:Atma Shatkam →Restructuring proposal: new section
20 December 2021
18 December 2021
- 15:5915:59, 18 December 2021 diff hist +96 Talk:Atma Shatkam →Traductore tradictore (Translator, betrayor)
- 15:2415:24, 18 December 2021 diff hist +3,466 Talk:Atma Shatkam →Traductore tradictore (Translator, betrayor): new section
3 November 2021
- 16:3216:32, 3 November 2021 diff hist +21 m Atma Shatkam Althought very pour in online sources -- as far as I have been able to research so far --, the Nirvana-Shatakam is surely non-devotional. To not create any kind of anymosity among any shaivists who might consider it devotional to the core, it is safe to say that the text is a summary of non-dualistic thinking. So I commuted the "devotional" word for "non-dualistic" which is more precise and more clear about the right context of the document. Regards!