User contributions for Larry Fafarman
A user with 57 edits. Account created on 2 October 2006.
12 July 2007
- 20:3320:33, 12 July 2007 diff hist +2,616 Talk:Cheri Yecke →Advocacy for intelligent design
- 16:3916:39, 12 July 2007 diff hist +572 Talk:Cheri Yecke →How to handle disruptive editing
- 16:0916:09, 12 July 2007 diff hist −3,006 Cheri Yecke Go to hell, dunghill. Calling their blogs "reputable" and my blog "crappy" is unacceptable.
- 10:5010:50, 12 July 2007
diff hist −3,006
Cheri Yecke
Deleted references to blogs. Poop or get off the can. If exception to sourcing rules are made for some blogs per WP:IAR, then the exception must be made for all blogs
- 01:3501:35, 12 July 2007 diff hist +1,387 Talk:Cheri Yecke →Advocacy for intelligent design
- 00:5700:57, 12 July 2007 diff hist +965 Talk:Cheri Yecke →How to handle disruptive editing
11 July 2007
- 21:0121:01, 11 July 2007 diff hist +731 Talk:Cheri Yecke →How to handle disruptive editing
- 19:2219:22, 11 July 2007 diff hist +124 Talk:Cheri Yecke →How to handle disruptive editing
- 19:1919:19, 11 July 2007 diff hist +801 Talk:Cheri Yecke →How to handle disruptive editing
- 18:5418:54, 11 July 2007 diff hist +4,396 Talk:Cheri Yecke →How to handle disruptive editing
- 11:5311:53, 11 July 2007 diff hist +1,151 Talk:Cheri Yecke →How to handle disruptive editing
- 11:3211:32, 11 July 2007 diff hist +2,857 Talk:Cheri Yecke →Advocacy for intelligent design
- 01:2201:22, 11 July 2007 diff hist +3 Talk:Cheri Yecke →Advocacy for intelligent design
10 July 2007
- 22:5522:55, 10 July 2007 diff hist +22 Talk:Cheri Yecke →Advocacy for intelligent design
- 22:2922:29, 10 July 2007 diff hist +1,891 Talk:Cheri Yecke →Advocacy for intelligent design
- 21:2921:29, 10 July 2007 diff hist +1,217 Talk:Cheri Yecke No edit summary
- 20:2020:20, 10 July 2007 diff hist −2,073 Cheri Yecke The sourcing rules say that the only exceptions to the "no blogs" rule are for bloggers who are (1) professional journalists or (2) writing about themselves. Stop playing games, dunghill
- 18:4018:40, 10 July 2007 diff hist +1,466 Talk:Cheri Yecke →Advocacy for intelligent design
- 17:5917:59, 10 July 2007 diff hist −2,073 Cheri Yecke Removed references to personal blogs -- Wikipedia verifiability rule against using personal blogs as sources makes no exception for personal blogs of "notable" people
- 06:5706:57, 10 July 2007 diff hist +1,169 Cheri Yecke Larry Fafarman's name and the name of his blog have been removed from this entry because of complaints of "self-promotion"
- 06:4206:42, 10 July 2007 diff hist +243 Talk:Cheri Yecke →Advocacy for intelligent design
- 06:3506:35, 10 July 2007 diff hist +227 Talk:Cheri Yecke →Advocacy for intelligent design
- 06:2806:28, 10 July 2007 diff hist +2,147 Talk:Cheri Yecke →Advocacy for intelligent design
- 02:5402:54, 10 July 2007 diff hist +164 Talk:Cheri Yecke →Advocacy for intelligent design
- 02:4802:48, 10 July 2007 diff hist +568 Talk:Cheri Yecke →=
- 01:4401:44, 10 July 2007 diff hist +1,010 Talk:Cheri Yecke →Advocacy for intelligent design
- 00:1000:10, 10 July 2007 diff hist +1,654 Talk:Cheri Yecke →Deletion?
9 July 2007
- 00:2600:26, 9 July 2007 diff hist +448 Talk:Cheri Yecke →Deletion?
8 July 2007
- 19:0619:06, 8 July 2007 diff hist +3,908 Talk:Cheri Yecke →Advocacy for intelligent design
- 17:5517:55, 8 July 2007 diff hist +13 Talk:Cheri Yecke →Advocacy for intelligent design
- 17:5317:53, 8 July 2007 diff hist 0 Talk:Cheri Yecke →Advocacy for intelligent design
- 17:5217:52, 8 July 2007 diff hist +930 Talk:Cheri Yecke →Advocacy for intelligent design
- 12:2912:29, 8 July 2007 diff hist +1,084 Talk:Cheri Yecke →Advocacy for intelligent design
- 11:1511:15, 8 July 2007 diff hist 0 Cheri Yecke "posted" more appropriate than "quoted" because entire letter was posted
- 10:5610:56, 8 July 2007 diff hist +1,500 Cheri Yecke IMO Wikipedia is not the place for political campaigning, but if you can't beat 'em, join 'em
2 November 2006
- 17:5817:58, 2 November 2006 diff hist +365 PZ Myers Tsumetai has also broken the 3RR. Also, Tsumetai and Guettarda are playing tag-team reversion. My statement is NPOV. The notability issue applies only to whole articles.
- 13:4713:47, 2 November 2006 diff hist +365 PZ Myers What is 3RR? The 3RR page has been deleted from Wikipedia.
- 11:2911:29, 2 November 2006 diff hist +365 PZ Myers →Pharyngula.org
- 10:3210:32, 2 November 2006 diff hist +365 PZ Myers →Pharyngula.org
- 09:4209:42, 2 November 2006 diff hist +365 PZ Myers →Pharyngula.org
- 07:4307:43, 2 November 2006 diff hist +365 PZ Myers This is an NPOV (neutral point of view) statement. There are some non-NPOV statements in this article and I have not messed with them -- so stop messing with this statement.
31 October 2006
- 23:5123:51, 31 October 2006 diff hist +365 PZ Myers The whole article is not a significant view or fact -- PZ is a nobody, relatively speaking. You are really getting desperate, not even citing Wikipedia policies anymore.
- 21:5521:55, 31 October 2006 diff hist +365 PZ Myers Wikpedia's notability policy applies only to whole articles. And if blogs are not allowed, then the whole section on the Pharyngula blog should be deleted.
- 21:2021:20, 31 October 2006 diff hist +365 PZ Myers What matters is whether the statement has an NPOV (neutral point of view). It has an NPOV.
- 20:5620:56, 31 October 2006 diff hist +365 PZ Myers I added the words "it has been claimed," though I doubt that anyone would make a false claim about that.
- 20:1420:14, 31 October 2006 diff hist +329 PZ Myers →Pharyngula.org
- 17:5817:58, 31 October 2006 diff hist +338 PZ Myers →Pharyngula.org
3 October 2006
- 23:3823:38, 3 October 2006 diff hist +1,827 Talk:List of books banned by governments →Challenged books
