User contributions for Liketoread
A user with 52 edits. Account created on 18 September 2006.
7 December 2006
- 15:1615:16, 7 December 2006 diff hist −259 Oprah Winfrey →Early life: removed mention of pregnancy since it's discussed in the personal life section
4 December 2006
- 15:1615:16, 4 December 2006
diff hist −718
User:Liketoread
←Replaced page with '#########LIKETOREAD'S PAGE################'
30 November 2006
- 17:2517:25, 30 November 2006 diff hist +126 User talk:David Fuchs →Adding hateful POV content to biography articles
- 17:2117:21, 30 November 2006 diff hist +316 User talk:David Fuchs No edit summary
- 17:1717:17, 30 November 2006
diff hist −453
User talk:Liketoread
←Blanked the page current
- 17:1417:14, 30 November 2006 diff hist −1,061 Oprah Winfrey revert to last version by Timelist. Poorly sourced negative POV is unacceptable in living biographies, please don't advertise your web pages
- 17:1117:11, 30 November 2006
diff hist +42 N
User:Liketoread
←Created page with '#########LIKETOREAD'S PAGE################'
25 October 2006
- 18:3918:39, 25 October 2006 diff hist +844 Talk:J. Philippe Rushton →This article is biased and libelous
- 18:3018:30, 25 October 2006 diff hist +527 Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard →Help needed at the [[J. Phillipe Rushton]] aricle
- 18:2318:23, 25 October 2006 diff hist +467 Talk:J. Philippe Rushton →This article is biased and libelous
- 18:1718:17, 25 October 2006 diff hist +764 Talk:J. Philippe Rushton →Recent edit warring
- 18:0918:09, 25 October 2006 diff hist +674 Talk:J. Philippe Rushton →This article is biased and libelous
- 18:0218:02, 25 October 2006 diff hist +1,027 Talk:J. Philippe Rushton →Recent edit warring
- 17:5417:54, 25 October 2006 diff hist +9 Talk:J. Philippe Rushton →This article is biased and libelous
- 17:5217:52, 25 October 2006 diff hist +948 Talk:J. Philippe Rushton →This article is biased and libelous
- 17:3717:37, 25 October 2006 diff hist +341 Talk:J. Philippe Rushton →This article is biased and libelous
- 17:3417:34, 25 October 2006 diff hist −1 Talk:J. Philippe Rushton →Recent edit warring
- 17:3417:34, 25 October 2006 diff hist +182 Talk:J. Philippe Rushton →Recent edit warring
- 17:3017:30, 25 October 2006 diff hist −453 User talk:Liketoread No edit summary
- 17:2917:29, 25 October 2006 diff hist +337 Talk:J. Philippe Rushton →This article is biased and libelous
- 17:2617:26, 25 October 2006 diff hist +438 Talk:J. Philippe Rushton →Recent edit warring
- 17:2117:21, 25 October 2006 diff hist +8,677 J. Philippe Rushton revert to last version by Liketoread. Why is it always the same 2 editors who're always tag teaming anyone who tries to fix this article?
- 17:1917:19, 25 October 2006 diff hist +521 Talk:J. Philippe Rushton →This article is biased and libelous
- 17:1417:14, 25 October 2006 diff hist +8,691 J. Philippe Rushton Please stop violating the 3 RR rule. This has been discussed on the talk page to death. You simply don't accept other view points
- 17:0117:01, 25 October 2006 diff hist +8,691 J. Philippe Rushton revert to last version by 205.211.52.10 as per points made on the talk page
- 17:0017:00, 25 October 2006 diff hist +499 Talk:J. Philippe Rushton →This article is biased and libelous
4 October 2006
- 20:1220:12, 4 October 2006 diff hist −3,108 J. Philippe Rushton Do you even think before you revert? We don't need 2 criticism sections!
- 19:1619:16, 4 October 2006 diff hist −28 J. Philippe Rushton →Praise: replaced Brand's quote which isn't even about Rushton with Peter Knudson's
- 19:1419:14, 4 October 2006 diff hist +220 Talk:J. Philippe Rushton →Edits and reverts
- 19:1219:12, 4 October 2006 diff hist −3,080 J. Philippe Rushton we don't need 2 separate sections describing criticism
3 October 2006
- 17:5517:55, 3 October 2006 diff hist +225 Talk:J. Philippe Rushton →Massive purge
- 17:5017:50, 3 October 2006 diff hist −4,114 J. Philippe Rushton revert: If there's no room to detail the work he's famous for, there's no room to trash him either.
2 October 2006
- 19:2119:21, 2 October 2006 diff hist +1 J. Philippe Rushton →Favorable: spacing
- 19:2119:21, 2 October 2006 diff hist +65 J. Philippe Rushton →Favorable: added balance to Eysenk description
- 19:1819:18, 2 October 2006 diff hist −27 J. Philippe Rushton →Favorable: replaced Brand's praise with Peter Knudson's comment to show non-pioneer fund perspective.
- 19:1419:14, 2 October 2006 diff hist −4,153 J. Philippe Rushton →Controversy and criticism: removed controversy section. If there's no room to detail his theory, there's no room to detail the controversy, plus its covered by unfavorable opinions
23 September 2006
- 20:0620:06, 23 September 2006 diff hist +1,049 Talk:J. Philippe Rushton →Edits and reverts
- 19:5419:54, 23 September 2006 diff hist +1,179 Talk:J. Philippe Rushton →Edits and reverts
- 19:3919:39, 23 September 2006 diff hist +717 Talk:J. Philippe Rushton →Edits and reverts
21 September 2006
- 17:5017:50, 21 September 2006 diff hist −5 J. Philippe Rushton →Validity of the concept of race: at the very least this MUST be corrected
- 17:4817:48, 21 September 2006 diff hist +705 Talk:J. Philippe Rushton →Edits and reverts
- 16:4416:44, 21 September 2006 diff hist +904 Talk:J. Philippe Rushton →Edits and reverts
20 September 2006
- 18:0818:08, 20 September 2006 diff hist +3,042 J. Philippe Rushton Wikipedia states you're supposed to make edits better, not revert them. Please fix the parts you have a problem with rather than reverting the whole thing.
- 18:0518:05, 20 September 2006 diff hist +1,228 Talk:J. Philippe Rushton →Edits and reverts
- 17:5117:51, 20 September 2006 diff hist +3,042 J. Philippe Rushton They're not my changes. I'm supporting the changes of others. You 2 editors have been blocking progress in the article for months while doing nothing to improve it.
19 September 2006
- 19:0319:03, 19 September 2006 diff hist +1,009 Talk:J. Philippe Rushton →Edits and reverts
- 18:5118:51, 19 September 2006 diff hist +3,042 J. Philippe Rushton The new changes did not remove info, they added info. You create edit wars by reverting changes instead of fixing them. That's not how wikipedia works. Others don't need your permission to edit
- 18:1018:10, 19 September 2006 diff hist +385 Talk:J. Philippe Rushton →Edits and reverts
- 18:0518:05, 19 September 2006 diff hist +3,042 J. Philippe Rushton JereKrischel this article will never become neutral if newbies are not allowed to make changes freely. If you have a problem discuss it on the talk page.
18 September 2006
- 17:5317:53, 18 September 2006 diff hist +2,808 J. Philippe Rushton revert: I did not make the changes but they are far superior to the previous version which isn't saying much
