User contributions for Martinphi
A user with 12,452 edits. Account created on 4 August 2003.
29 March 2009
- 01:4401:44, 29 March 2009 diff hist +3,572 User talk:Martinphi →Indefinite block
26 March 2009
- 21:3121:31, 26 March 2009 diff hist +358 User talk:Martinphi →Indefinite block
- 06:2406:24, 26 March 2009 diff hist −7,560 User talk:Martinphi No edit summary
12 January 2009
- 21:3421:34, 12 January 2009 diff hist +312 User talk:Martinphi →In the email
- 21:3321:33, 12 January 2009 diff hist +5,626 User talk:Martinphi →In the email
- 19:3719:37, 12 January 2009 diff hist +51 User talk:Martinphi →Indefinite block
- 18:4718:47, 12 January 2009 diff hist +124 User talk:Martinphi →Indefinite block
- 18:4618:46, 12 January 2009 diff hist +450 User talk:Martinphi →Indefinite block
- 18:4318:43, 12 January 2009 diff hist +68 User talk:Martinphi →Indefinite block
- 06:3106:31, 12 January 2009 diff hist −173 Neale Donald Walsch →Criticism: Sources first
- 06:1506:15, 12 January 2009 diff hist +326 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop →Why Wikipedia cannot claim the earth is flat
- 03:3803:38, 12 January 2009 diff hist +591 Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop →Exceptional claims: Reply to Scientizzle
- 03:3503:35, 12 January 2009 diff hist +707 Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop →Exceptional claims
- 02:1902:19, 12 January 2009 diff hist +5 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision →Wording is too open for interpretation
- 02:1802:18, 12 January 2009 diff hist +398 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision →Wording is too open for interpretation
- 02:1402:14, 12 January 2009 diff hist +285 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision →Wording is too open for interpretation
- 02:1302:13, 12 January 2009 diff hist +645 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision →Wording is too open for interpretation
- 02:0402:04, 12 January 2009 diff hist +11 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision →Wording is too open for interpretation
- 02:0202:02, 12 January 2009 diff hist +868 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision →Wording is too open for interpretation
- 01:5401:54, 12 January 2009 diff hist +443 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision →Wording is too open for interpretation
- 01:4401:44, 12 January 2009 diff hist +785 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision →Wording is too open for interpretation
- 01:3101:31, 12 January 2009 diff hist +828 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision →Fringe science vs. pseudoscience
- 01:2301:23, 12 January 2009 diff hist +842 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision →Tiny example
- 01:1301:13, 12 January 2009 diff hist +3,051 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision →Wording is too open for interpretation
- 00:0300:03, 12 January 2009 diff hist +22 Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence →Debunking: Correct a minor mistake
11 January 2009
- 22:4422:44, 11 January 2009 diff hist +1,084 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision →Encouraged, discouraged and dismayed: The ArbCom is allowing Original Research---at this point they are creating policy
- 22:3722:37, 11 January 2009 diff hist +370 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision →On remedy 7 and stoking fires
- 22:3222:32, 11 January 2009 diff hist +605 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision →Tiny example
- 06:5706:57, 11 January 2009 diff hist +133 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision →Tiny example
- 06:5506:55, 11 January 2009 diff hist +414 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision →Tiny example
- 06:5106:51, 11 January 2009 diff hist +974 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision →Mentorship
- 06:1306:13, 11 January 2009 diff hist +151 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision →Tiny example
- 06:1106:11, 11 January 2009
diff hist −122
Cold reading
Rv -this is a WP:BLPviolation, as well as heavy POV
- 06:0006:00, 11 January 2009 diff hist +825 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision →On remedy 7 and stoking fires: tiny example of debunking. Little case study, though I could give dozens, worse
- 03:5203:52, 11 January 2009 diff hist −284 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision →On remedy 7 and stoking fires
- 03:5103:51, 11 January 2009 diff hist +784 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision →On remedy 7 and stoking fires
- 01:5001:50, 11 January 2009 diff hist +424 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop →comment to Martinphi
- 01:4701:47, 11 January 2009 diff hist +744 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop →Comment: If it's going to be a contest, and it is, why not have rules and make it work for the good of the encyclopedia?
- 01:2701:27, 11 January 2009 diff hist +213 Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence →Further: Please note also that you just wrote the last section of the table into this ArbCom
- 01:1901:19, 11 January 2009 diff hist −83 m Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence →Evidence presented by User:DGG
- 01:1401:14, 11 January 2009 diff hist +625 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision →Advocacy
- 01:0701:07, 11 January 2009 diff hist +327 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision →Remedy 5
- 01:0601:06, 11 January 2009 diff hist +2 Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence →Further
- 01:0401:04, 11 January 2009 diff hist +1,305 Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence →Unfinished!: I think policy is fine the way it is and the last thing I want to do is change it.
- 00:4500:45, 11 January 2009 diff hist −1 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision →Encouraged, discouraged and dismayed
- 00:4300:43, 11 January 2009 diff hist +960 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision →Encouraged, discouraged and dismayed
- 00:3200:32, 11 January 2009 diff hist +743 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision →Encouraged, discouraged and dismayed: My position on policy has been to be a stick-in-the-mud along with a bunch of other editors like Blueboar and Vassyana, and say there is no change necessary
- 00:2800:28, 11 January 2009 diff hist +365 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision →Comments
10 January 2009
- 23:3423:34, 10 January 2009 diff hist +632 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision →Encouraged, discouraged and dismayed
- 23:3123:31, 10 January 2009 diff hist +1,066 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision →Encouraged, discouraged and dismayed
