User contributions for Mkenny6

13 November 2018

• 19:1419:14, 13 November 2018 diff hist +1,334‎ User talk:Mkenny6 ‎ →‎Edit warring at Iz One current

12 November 2018

• 20:5220:52, 12 November 2018 diff hist +908‎ User talk:Mkenny6 ‎ →‎November 2018
• 19:4619:46, 12 November 2018 diff hist +1,079‎ User talk:Mkenny6 ‎ →‎November 2018
• 19:3119:31, 12 November 2018 diff hist −27‎ Iz*One ‎ See my comments on your talk page! Please see the essence and do not hang on the superficial sources. Whoever think of it, this group was created by K-pop and not based on the J-pop? Why do you think that this is J-pop genre? What did they do to create this group? This is so ridiculous!
• 19:2919:29, 12 November 2018 diff hist +441‎ Talk:Iz*One ‎ →‎Nationality dispute
• 19:2619:26, 12 November 2018 diff hist +440‎ Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring ‎ →‎User:Mkenny6 reported by User:Bellezzasolo (Result: )
• 19:2019:20, 12 November 2018 diff hist −10‎ Iz*One ‎ Please make sure that this group is from K-pop. Why is this group originated on J-pop as well? Do not rely on the superficial sources!! In your theory, TWICE is also J-pop genre? You know this is so ridiculous, don't you? I want to ask you that are you Japan-friendly user? See the fact and do not distort the fact!!!
• 19:1219:12, 12 November 2018 diff hist +616‎ Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring ‎ →‎User:Mkenny6 reported by User:Bellezzasolo (Result: )
• 19:0319:03, 12 November 2018 diff hist +393‎ User talk:Mkenny6 ‎ →‎Cut it out
• 18:5418:54, 12 November 2018 diff hist −10‎ Iz*One ‎ This is composed by nine Koreans and three Japaneses but does that mean this group is K-pop and J-pop? Non-sense!! This group is from K-pop purely! In your theory, TWICE is K-pop and J-pop? Please make sure the fact. Do not reply on the source which would be wrong. This is definite whoever see this!
• 18:5018:50, 12 November 2018 diff hist +147‎ Talk:Iz*One ‎ →‎Nationality dispute
• 18:4818:48, 12 November 2018 diff hist −10‎ Iz*One ‎No edit summary
• 18:4818:48, 12 November 2018 diff hist +70‎ User talk:Mkenny6 ‎ →‎Cut it out
• 18:4618:46, 12 November 2018 diff hist −10‎ Iz*One ‎ genre is K-pop only. This group is not for J-pop!
• 18:4218:42, 12 November 2018 diff hist −709‎ Iz*One ‎No edit summary
• 18:3618:36, 12 November 2018 diff hist −10‎ Iz*One ‎ genre is K-pop only. This group is not for J-pop!

4 November 2018

• 05:1805:18, 4 November 2018 diff hist −782‎ Iz*One ‎ “A girl group formed through Mnet” is enough! Tags: references removed Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 05:1605:16, 4 November 2018 diff hist +499‎ Talk:Iz*One ‎ →‎Nationality dispute
• 05:0705:07, 4 November 2018 diff hist +110‎ User talk:Mkenny6 ‎ →‎Second warning at Iz One
• 05:0305:03, 4 November 2018 diff hist +315‎ Talk:Iz*One ‎ →‎Nationality dispute
• 04:5604:56, 4 November 2018 diff hist −782‎ Iz*One ‎ What’s the fact? From the expression of the news? I want to ask you. Who made PD48? Which is the nation originality of IZ ONE? Why are you cling to the expression of “South Korean and Japanese”? Because it was used in many news typing? This term is disputable like we’re discussing here. That’s why I suggest to change it just “a girl group”. This expression is optimal and smooth to the general people! Why are you emphasizing the country name? Tags: references removed Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 04:4404:44, 4 November 2018 diff hist −782‎ Iz*One ‎ It is not necessarily said as “South Korean and Japanese”. Writing “a girl group” is good enough. And I don’t know how to join talks. Tags: references removed Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 04:2404:24, 4 November 2018 diff hist −782‎ Iz*One ‎ Iz one is a girl group formed through Mnet reality show “Produce 48” from South Korea. <—- This is the exact wording. Tags: references removed Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 04:1204:12, 4 November 2018 diff hist −791‎ Iz*One ‎ Do you agree that this group is based on South Korean K-pop system? If yes, why should it be expressed as “South Korean and Japanese”? As I said, it could give people misunderstand like “Co-production”. However, PD48 was not co-production but just “Collaboration” with the Japanese party. Your expression is wrong and you don’t need to emphasize “South Korean and Japanese”. It’d be best to say like “a girl group” and just explain each member. That’s the best. Please do not change anymore. Tags: references removed Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 04:0304:03, 4 November 2018 diff hist +1,249‎ User talk:Heolkpop ‎ →‎Iz one: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 02:1702:17, 4 November 2018 diff hist −776‎ Iz*One ‎ The references are just to write down as "South Korean-Japanese" in order to make people easy-understanding. That is just wording what the press conveniently use. The fact is that the show "PD48" was made by only South Korean and their goal was to debut the new girl group with mixing Korean and Japanese. That's why Mnet asked AKB48 to send them and AKB company just did it. That's it. Why did you emphasize co-production and give people wrong information!! Tag: references removed
• 00:3100:31, 4 November 2018 diff hist +4‎ Iz*One ‎ Keep summarizing the previous my change... This is a little bit wrong to say South Korean-Japanese group. This is originally made by South Korea and Japanese members just attended the show. It would give people who don't know misunderstanding. Please keep the phrase "South Korean girl group formed through..." and "nine Korean members and three Japanese members". And please link the other members.
• 00:2400:24, 4 November 2018 diff hist +23‎ Iz*One ‎ Hey. I'll leave Sakura name as Wikilink but I recommend you to link not only Sakura but also the other members. It's much even for all members. Also, to be clear, iz*one is the girl group to be originated from South Korea. This is a little bit wrong if you say this group is

3 November 2018

• 19:4719:47, 3 November 2018 diff hist −20‎ Iz*One ‎No edit summary
• 19:4519:45, 3 November 2018 diff hist −48‎ Iz*One ‎No edit summary
• 19:4419:44, 3 November 2018 diff hist +44‎ Iz*One ‎No edit summary
• 19:4319:43, 3 November 2018 diff hist +17‎ Iz*One ‎No edit summary
• 19:4119:41, 3 November 2018 diff hist −3‎ Iz*One ‎No edit summary

1 November 2018

• 21:4521:45, 1 November 2018 diff hist +3‎ Iz*One ‎No edit summary
• 21:4421:44, 1 November 2018 diff hist −51‎ Iz*One ‎No edit summary
• 21:3421:34, 1 November 2018 diff hist −20‎ Iz*One ‎No edit summary
• 21:3321:33, 1 November 2018 diff hist +23‎ Iz*One ‎No edit summary
• 21:1921:19, 1 November 2018 diff hist −18‎ Iz*One ‎No edit summary
• 21:1521:15, 1 November 2018 diff hist −20‎ Iz*One ‎ →‎Members
• 21:1421:14, 1 November 2018 diff hist −51‎ Iz*One ‎No edit summary