User contributions for TStolper1W

30 March 2008

• 13:2713:27, 30 March 2008 diff hist +1,150‎ Brilliant Light Power ‎ Even Rathke recognized “the wealth of experimental evidence” for hydrinos that had already been published by the time of his hostile 2005 theoretical critique. That evidence is now even richer.

28 March 2008

• 16:0416:04, 28 March 2008 diff hist +448‎ User talk:Hans Adler ‎ I see the two places now, thanks.
• 15:3815:38, 28 March 2008 diff hist +156‎ User talk:TStolper1W ‎ The WP:COIN debate has now been archived.
• 15:3215:32, 28 March 2008 diff hist −4‎ m User talk:TStolper1W ‎ Minor edit.
• 01:4401:44, 28 March 2008 diff hist +5,007‎ Brilliant Light Power ‎ Mills therefore thought that a new quantum theory was needed. At least one version of the Wiki article should be less steeply slanted toward the POV of his opponents, and have better documentation.

26 March 2008

• 03:1403:14, 26 March 2008 diff hist +145‎ Brilliant Light Power ‎ Standard quantum mechanics has been placed at the center of the Standard Model of contemporary theoretical physics.
• 01:5401:54, 26 March 2008 diff hist +584‎ User talk:TStolper1W ‎ If there is an edit war at
  Hydrino theory
  , then I think that it is a war led and encouraged by Michaelbusch; and I hope Eldereft won
• 01:3801:38, 26 March 2008 diff hist +517‎ User talk:Hans Adler ‎ A question about preventing line break (preventing line break sounds like a good idea).

25 March 2008

• 02:2502:25, 25 March 2008 diff hist +5,051‎ Brilliant Light Power ‎ Posted a fuller, better-documented version, which is also less steeply slanted toward the point of view (POV) of the opponents of Mills et al.

24 March 2008

• 00:5000:50, 24 March 2008 diff hist +4,337‎ Brilliant Light Power ‎ Posted a fuller version, with better documentation, a version that is also less steeply slanted toward the point of view (POV) of the opponents of Mills et al.

22 March 2008

• 22:5422:54, 22 March 2008 diff hist +520‎ Brilliant Light Power ‎ The reigning cosmology can now explain at best 5% of everything out there: Nicastro, Mathur, and Elvis, “Missing Baryons and the Warm-Hot Intergalactic Medium,” in Science 319 (Jan. 4, 2008).

21 March 2008

• 21:3521:35, 21 March 2008 diff hist +4,337‎ Brilliant Light Power ‎ Posted a version with better documentation, a version that is also less steeply slanted toward the views of the opponents of Mills et al.

20 March 2008

• 19:3719:37, 20 March 2008 diff hist +346‎ Brilliant Light Power ‎ Ordinary (low-temperature) superconductivity was thought to have been explained by BCS theory, but serious problems with that have been found: P. Aynajian et al., Science 319, pp. 1509-1512 (2008).

19 March 2008

• 18:1818:18, 19 March 2008 diff hist +3,922‎ Brilliant Light Power ‎ Restored a version of the article that is less steeply slanted toward the consensus of the opponents of Mills et al. and that has fuller documentation.

18 March 2008

• 18:1418:14, 18 March 2008 diff hist +3,922‎ Brilliant Light Power ‎ The article should explain what Mills’ theory is, and give some documentation for that, and not be so steeply slanted toward what his opponents think is wrong with Mills’ work.

16 March 2008

• 11:4011:40, 16 March 2008 diff hist +3,622‎ Brilliant Light Power ‎ The article is supposed to explain what Mills’ theory is, and give some documentation for that, and not be lopsidedly unbalanced toward what his opponents think is wrong with Mills’ work.

15 March 2008

• 15:0415:04, 15 March 2008 diff hist +84‎ User:TStolper1W ‎ Added the URL for my User talk page. current

14 March 2008

• 19:4619:46, 14 March 2008 diff hist +1,200‎ Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard ‎ Michaelbusch has been leading the attack in the Wikipedia upon Mills, and upon me, so I hope that MastCell won’t accept Michaelbusch’s interpretations of Mills’ work and of my editing at face value.
• 19:4119:41, 14 March 2008 diff hist +3,622‎ Brilliant Light Power ‎ Restored material, including deleted documentation, that gives some balance to a hostile version of the article.
• 15:2515:25, 14 March 2008 diff hist +208‎ User talk:MastCell ‎ Just a brief note to let MastCell know that I will shortly be resuming my editing of the Hydrino theory article.

10 March 2008

• 16:4916:49, 10 March 2008 diff hist +589‎ User talk:MastCell ‎ Will notify if I go to the admin's noticeboard. Let me think about this, and see how much advantage Mills' opponents take of the new situation.

8 March 2008

• 16:4016:40, 8 March 2008 diff hist +3,467‎ Brilliant Light Power ‎ Athaenara: no block is in force against me: see the Block log. Why join the campaign of Mills’ opponents against him by making a blanket erasure that they want, including erasure of documentation?
• 16:2216:22, 8 March 2008 diff hist +112‎ User:TStolper1W ‎ Name, town, and email address

6 March 2008

• 16:2416:24, 6 March 2008 diff hist +3,467‎ Brilliant Light Power ‎ The blanket erasure of the sequence of edits by me below even went so far as to erase documentation.

3 March 2008

• 16:4916:49, 3 March 2008 diff hist +154‎ Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard ‎ What is the connection to which MastCell currently objects?

2 March 2008

• 16:0516:05, 2 March 2008 diff hist +60‎ Brilliant Light Power ‎ The citation to the false imputation of plagiarism is to an especially hostile longtime critic of Mills. Mills cited his sources and used the cited material for purposes of criticism and scholarship.
• 15:4515:45, 2 March 2008 diff hist +84‎ Brilliant Light Power ‎ Added an external link, to the Society for Classical Quantum Mechanics (SCQM).
• 15:3915:39, 2 March 2008 diff hist +306‎ Brilliant Light Power ‎ No pseudoscientist has ever been able to do all that Mills has done.
• 15:3715:37, 2 March 2008 diff hist +5‎ Brilliant Light Power ‎ Developments and debate continued into 2007.
• 15:3515:35, 2 March 2008 diff hist +231‎ Brilliant Light Power ‎ Mills submitted a rebuttal to Rathke’s 2005 article that was too long. The editor replied that it would take a lot to convince him to publish even a short rebuttal: see SCQM message 11.
• 15:3315:33, 2 March 2008 diff hist +160‎ Brilliant Light Power ‎ Mills cited his sources and used excerpts from them for purposes of criticism and scholarship, so he was surprised to see that used to attack him.
• 15:3015:30, 2 March 2008 diff hist +225‎ Brilliant Light Power ‎ Millsian, the computational chemistry program based on CQM, has already modelled hundreds of molecules. See Mills’ book and the Millsian website.
• 15:2815:28, 2 March 2008 diff hist +273‎ Brilliant Light Power ‎ A comprehensive review of experimental evidence for small hydrogen atoms (hydrinos) is R. Mills et al., Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 32, 14 (Sept. 2007), pp. 2988-3009.
• 15:2515:25, 2 March 2008 diff hist +176‎ Brilliant Light Power ‎ Line broadening that supports Mills’ model is in Phillips et al., Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 32, 14 (September 2007), pp. 3010-3025.
• 15:2315:23, 2 March 2008 diff hist +145‎ Brilliant Light Power ‎ Mills doesn’t accept the reigning hypothesis of enormous expansion during an extremely brief and extremely rapid period of initial inflation.
• 15:1915:19, 2 March 2008 diff hist +217‎ Brilliant Light Power ‎ Since hydrinos are small hydrogen atoms, they would have a smaller collision cross-section than standard hydrogen atoms.
• 15:1515:15, 2 March 2008 diff hist +160‎ Brilliant Light Power ‎ The catalyst ion or atom absorbs energy, usually an integer multiple of one hartree (a hartree is 27.2 eV).
• 15:1315:13, 2 March 2008 diff hist +127‎ Brilliant Light Power ‎ Hydrinos can be thought of as redundant ground states: see Hydrino Study Group, message 3843, from Mills, dated Feb. 6, 2002.
• 15:0915:09, 2 March 2008 diff hist +180‎ Brilliant Light Power ‎ Undisturbed hydrogen atoms are shaped like balls (APS News 7, 4 (April 1998), p. 3), so they fit Mills' model of the hydrogen atom as well as the standard model.
• 15:0715:07, 2 March 2008 diff hist −4‎ Brilliant Light Power ‎ In CQM, the free electron and the bound electron are charge-current distributions rather than distributions of charge only.
• 15:0215:02, 2 March 2008 diff hist +20‎ Brilliant Light Power ‎ Mills views the free electron and the bound electron as charge-current distributions rather than distributions of charge only.
• 14:5914:59, 2 March 2008 diff hist +231‎ Brilliant Light Power ‎ Restored a relevant quote. Even Rathke referred to the “wealth of experimental data that has been published in peer reviewed journals in favor of the hydrino model,” though he didn’t discuss the data
• 14:5614:56, 2 March 2008 diff hist +232‎ Brilliant Light Power ‎ Mills’ Classical Quantum Mechanics (CQM) is based on the classical physics of Newton and Maxwell, but essential quantum concepts like Planck’s constant appear throughout CQM.
• 14:5214:52, 2 March 2008 diff hist +36‎ Brilliant Light Power ‎ So a new quantum theory is needed.
• 14:5114:51, 2 March 2008 diff hist +401‎ Brilliant Light Power ‎ Mills has produced strong experimental evidence for hydrinos, including novel spectroscopic peaks in Mills & Ray 2003 (J. Phys. D. 36, pp. 1535-1542).
• 14:4114:41, 2 March 2008 diff hist +64‎ Brilliant Light Power ‎ Standard quantum mechanics (SQM) insists that there can’t be hydrogen atoms as small as Mills proposes.
• 14:3814:38, 2 March 2008 diff hist +3‎ Brilliant Light Power ‎ Hydrinos are small hydrogen atoms.

1 March 2008

• 13:2913:29, 1 March 2008 diff hist +544‎ Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard ‎ The Wikipedia wasn’t founded to enforce orthodoxy. It’s a credential rather than a COI to have studied, since 1991, the reception of Mills’ work. ~~~~

28 February 2008

• 15:3215:32, 28 February 2008 diff hist +761‎ Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard ‎ Mills is a real and original scientist, and he deserves a defense in the Wikipedia proportionate to the attack on him there.
• 15:2415:24, 28 February 2008 diff hist +2,523‎ Brilliant Light Power ‎ Undid the blanket erasure of several earlier contributions, erased all in one go by Michaelbusch.