User contributions for 50.59.111.70

23 September 2019

• 01:0101:01, 23 September 2019 diff hist +1,367‎ Talk:Epistle to the Romans ‎ →‎Romans 1.18-32
• 00:5300:53, 23 September 2019 diff hist +31‎ Epistle to the Romans ‎ →‎The judgment of God (1:18–32): Edited as per secondary sources on talk page. Neutral wording is required.

22 September 2019

• 20:2420:24, 22 September 2019 diff hist +581‎ Talk:Epistle to the Romans ‎ →‎Romans 1.18-32
• 18:4618:46, 22 September 2019 diff hist +233‎ Talk:Epistle to the Romans ‎No edit summary
• 18:4418:44, 22 September 2019 diff hist +50‎ Talk:Epistle to the Romans ‎No edit summary
• 18:4318:43, 22 September 2019 diff hist +112‎ Talk:Epistle to the Romans ‎ →‎The judgment of God (1:18–32)
• 18:4018:40, 22 September 2019 diff hist +20‎ Talk:Epistle to the Romans ‎ →‎Romans 1.18-32
• 18:4018:40, 22 September 2019 diff hist +83‎ Talk:Epistle to the Romans ‎ →‎Romans 1.18-32
• 18:2718:27, 22 September 2019 diff hist +388‎ Talk:Epistle to the Romans ‎ →‎Romans 1.18-32
• 17:1817:18, 22 September 2019 diff hist +23‎ Epistle to the Romans ‎ →‎The judgment of God (1:18–32): reverted as per talk page.
• 16:5716:57, 22 September 2019 diff hist +170‎ Talk:Epistle to the Romans ‎ →‎The judgment of God (1:18–32)
• 16:4316:43, 22 September 2019 diff hist +431‎ Talk:Epistle to the Romans ‎ →‎The judgment of God (1:18–32)
• 16:1516:15, 22 September 2019 diff hist −5‎ Epistle to the Romans ‎ →‎The judgment of God (1:18–32)
• 16:1216:12, 22 September 2019 diff hist +203‎ Talk:Epistle to the Romans ‎ →‎The judgment of God (1:18–32)
• 16:0816:08, 22 September 2019 diff hist +289‎ Talk:Epistle to the Romans ‎ →‎Romans 1.18-32
• 16:0516:05, 22 September 2019 diff hist +18‎ Epistle to the Romans ‎ →‎The judgment of God (1:18–32)
• 15:5715:57, 22 September 2019 diff hist +543‎ Talk:Epistle to the Romans ‎ →‎The judgment of God (1:18–32)
• 15:5315:53, 22 September 2019 diff hist +174‎ Talk:Epistle to the Romans ‎ →‎Romans 1.18-32

21 September 2019

• 19:4219:42, 21 September 2019 diff hist +201‎ Talk:Epistle to the Romans ‎ →‎Romans 1.18-32
• 19:4019:40, 21 September 2019 diff hist +1,597‎ Talk:Epistle to the Romans ‎ →‎Romans 1.18-32
• 19:2319:23, 21 September 2019 diff hist −23‎ Talk:Epistle to the Romans ‎ →‎The judgment of God (1:18–32)
• 19:2219:22, 21 September 2019 diff hist +141‎ Talk:Epistle to the Romans ‎ →‎The judgment of God (1:18–32)
• 19:1619:16, 21 September 2019 diff hist +1,108‎ Talk:Epistle to the Romans ‎ →‎The judgment of God (1:18–32)
• 13:1413:14, 21 September 2019 diff hist +158‎ Talk:Epistle to the Romans ‎ →‎Romans 1.18-32
• 13:1113:11, 21 September 2019 diff hist +153‎ Talk:Epistle to the Romans ‎ →‎Romans 1.18-32
• 13:1013:10, 21 September 2019 diff hist +424‎ Talk:Epistle to the Romans ‎ →‎Romans 1.18-32
• 13:0713:07, 21 September 2019 diff hist +342‎ Talk:Epistle to the Romans ‎ →‎Romans 1.18-32
• 12:4912:49, 21 September 2019 diff hist +18‎ Epistle to the Romans ‎ →‎The judgment of God (1:18–32): You musn't keep switching it back. I'm open to suggestions but at the very least you must recognize that "He" is very likely inaccurate. "His summary" is fine.
• 03:4303:43, 21 September 2019 diff hist +18‎ Epistle to the Romans ‎ →‎The judgment of God (1:18–32): This requires neutral wording. Whether 1.18-32 represents Paul's own position or not is open to debate, yes, but it cannot be said with certainty that it is necessarily his own position. That's the point of the first sentence. We really must use neutral wording here.
• 03:3203:32, 21 September 2019 diff hist +1‎ Talk:Epistle to the Romans ‎ →‎Romans 1.18-32
• 03:3103:31, 21 September 2019 diff hist +215‎ Talk:Epistle to the Romans ‎ →‎Romans 1.18-32: new section
• 03:2503:25, 21 September 2019 diff hist +140‎ Epistle to the Romans ‎ →‎The judgment of God (1:18–32)
• 03:2403:24, 21 September 2019 diff hist +18‎ Epistle to the Romans ‎ →‎The judgment of God (1:18–32): I really do feel strongly that we should arrive at neutral wording. What speaks against "His summary"? It's precisely what the Calvin Porter article mentioned in the first sentence supports. Shall I add a footnote?
• 03:1103:11, 21 September 2019 diff hist +18‎ Epistle to the Romans ‎ →‎The judgment of God (1:18–32): Paul quotes imagined interlocutors all the time. His summary - see the peer-reviewed sources in the first sentence - is just that. Whether it represents his own view or not is open to interpretation, but "His summary" or "This" is more neutral than "He."
• 03:0003:00, 21 September 2019 diff hist +20‎ Epistle to the Romans ‎ →‎The judgment of God (1:18–32): Okay, will do, but I encourage you to leave "This summary" in place. Otherwise you are creating a grammatical problem, which I think must be against policy here somewhere, no?
• 02:4502:45, 21 September 2019 diff hist +6‎ Epistle to the Romans ‎ →‎The judgment of God (1:18–32): Reverting the revisions really is making a mess of the grammar. The pronoun for discourse must be "This," not "He." Where is this talk page? And at the very least, please leave the period to end the sentence in place.
• 02:2602:26, 21 September 2019 diff hist +2‎ Epistle to the Romans ‎ →‎The judgment of God (1:18–32): Here too, not "He" but "This" per the sources cited in the first sentence. I'm fixing an obvious grammar problem. Help me understand why the mismatch should be left in place?
• 02:2502:25, 21 September 2019 diff hist −2‎ Epistle to the Romans ‎ →‎The judgment of God (1:18–32): I'm new to wikipedia so help me understand. Several independent scholarly peer-reviewed sources published over several decades are already cited. Therefore the grammar must be not "Paul says" but "This says." How can it be otherwise? That's just making a mess of the grammar.
• 02:1202:12, 21 September 2019 diff hist +14‎ Epistle to the Romans ‎ →‎The judgment of God (1:18–32): This is not an edit war not my own research. I'm fixing things that are obviously errors. That 1.18-32 is Hellenistic Jewish apologist discourse is already cited by several independent, scholarly, peer-reviewed sources. It follows then that it cannot be "Paul says" but "The discourse says." I believe "This says" is an acceptable compromise.
• 02:0302:03, 21 September 2019 diff hist +1‎ Epistle to the Romans ‎ →‎The judgment of God (1:18–32)
• 02:0202:02, 21 September 2019 diff hist +24‎ Epistle to the Romans ‎ →‎Paul's warning of hypocrites (2:1–4)
• 02:0202:02, 21 September 2019 diff hist +10‎ Epistle to the Romans ‎ →‎The judgment of God (1:18–32)
• 01:5001:50, 21 September 2019 diff hist +9‎ Epistle to the Romans ‎ →‎The judgment of God (1:18–32)
• 01:5001:50, 21 September 2019 diff hist +29‎ Epistle to the Romans ‎ →‎The judgment of God (1:18–32)
• 01:4901:49, 21 September 2019 diff hist +1‎ Epistle to the Romans ‎ →‎The judgment of God (1:18–32)
• 01:4801:48, 21 September 2019 diff hist +122‎ Epistle to the Romans ‎ →‎Paul's warning of hypocrites (2:1–4)
• 01:4701:47, 21 September 2019 diff hist +24‎ Epistle to the Romans ‎ →‎Paul's warning of hypocrites (2:1–4)
• 01:4601:46, 21 September 2019 diff hist −2‎ Epistle to the Romans ‎ →‎The judgment of God (1:18–32)

20 September 2019

• 23:4223:42, 20 September 2019 diff hist +56‎ Epistle to the Romans ‎ →‎Paul's warning of hypocrites (2:1–4)
• 23:4123:41, 20 September 2019 diff hist +19‎ Epistle to the Romans ‎ →‎The judgment of God (1:18–32)