User talk:Superastig: Difference between revisions

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:38, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Babayaran Mo ng Dugo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, nothing found in a

WP:NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 13:40, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Superastig. An

how are you friend, we haven't talked for a long time, how are my edits on Ang Probinsyano Page? Is there a lot of vandalism? Gardo Versace 2 (talk) 08:21, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just fix all the Errors on The Page of Ang Probinsyano, because I can't edit first because of my Online Class so I just leave it to you to Edit all the Pages of Ang Probinsyano here on Wikipedia, and thank you very much friend. Gardo Versace 2 (talk) 08:23, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gardo Versace 2, I'm alright. I've been busy cleaning up articles related to PH radio for the past few months and I occasionally visit articles of various TV shows to do some clean-up. Ang Probinsyano has been taken care of admins like ChompyAce whenever they spot any disruptive edits. BTW, what happened to your other account? ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 01:08, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I want to decrease the Radio Time until 8:00 PM thanks Kearl Lago (talk) 23:17, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This schedule went sign off til 10:00 PM. Please do not edit until COVID-19 is disappeared Kearl Lago (talk) 12:14, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOTDIR first. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 13:09, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Pandemic Kearl Lago (talk) 12:10, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOTDIR. It's not hard to understand. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 12:48, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

I thought of doing the Ice-T/Ice Cube combo too! But I'm glad that you actually went for it. If I had, my signature would look something like this:

History DMZ ^{(Ice-T)+(Ice Cube)}

History DMZ, thanks. I made my current signature out of boredom. I've changed signature styles a few times before just for fun. 😅 ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 01:18, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Superastig. Two

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bandera News Philippines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Catarman.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! can you clean-up the Make It with You (TV series) Page? because many users have already edited it but what they edited seems to be scandalous and include the Pamilya Ko Page as well. thank you. Jricaplaza (talk) 02:46, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jricaplaza, I already cleaned up Pamilya Ko a week ago, but I have yet to clean up Make It with You. If you encounter disruptive edits from unregistered users for the following days, it's best to go here to request semi-protection for those 2 pages. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 14:38, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All right thank you very much for the Reminder. Jricaplaza (talk) 02:28, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've cleared up the Make It with You Page, did I clean-up correctly? or is there anything missing? and also please check my editing, thank you. Jricaplaza (talk) 20:10, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jricaplaza, Not bad. Though, I already made a few corrections in the page. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 00:02, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a Title Card of "Huwag Kang Mangamba"? please upload, thank you. Jricaplaza (talk) 16:46, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jricaplaza, already uploaded. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 06:03, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much men! :> Jricaplaza (talk) 07:52, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I just wanted to thank you for your input at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/In Honour of Icon E - A Tribute to Emperor - I've been meaning to respond there but it kept slipping my mind. I've made the article into a semi-decent album stub (or so I hope) using most of the sources you provided. By the way, do you have any experience with uploading cover art? The article currently doesn't have any. Lennart97 (talk) 13:14, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lennart97, you're welcome. I already made some minor clean-up and added the album cover as you requested. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 01:09, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome, thanks! Lennart97 (talk) 11:32, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. HiwilmsTalk 14:10, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:HotshotsMovie.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:30, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

can you Clean-Up the Pages of

many Users vandalize it. So please fix and clean-up all the Pages. Billy Argenta (talk) 16:06, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I also can't Clean-Up the Page because there is a lot of Suckpuppetry on the Page. so to the Expert Editors I am asking for help to just Clean-up all the Information on all The Page of Ang Probinsyano etc. Billy Argenta (talk) 16:10, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

but if you can't do what I'm asking you to do, just have the Editors you know do it as long as all the information is in order. Billy Argenta (talk) 16:12, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

and there are also names on the Cast and Characters and Guest Stars that are not really part of the show. so I hope you can Clean Up. Billy Argenta (talk) 16:17, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

as well as Ang Probinsyano season 1 to 8 more Clean up thanks. Billy Argenta (talk) 16:19, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

as well as all the References on all the Pages of Ang Probinsyano you also cleaned up. Billy Argenta (talk) 16:23, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

List of Ang Probinsyano episodes are already semi-protected. I suggest you go to RfPP and request List of Ang Probinsyano guest stars and List of Ang Probinsyano characters to be semi-protected for at least 1 year to prevent IP users and banned users from editing them. You can also use Twinkle to perform those actions if ever. I hope that will help. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 07:36, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Billy Argenta, I see no problem with the guest stars page. While it is true that there are cast members there that were not given on screen credits, nonetheless, other outlets have credited them as appearing on the show and the citation thereto is attached. So that isn't problematic as you make it out to be. Gardo Versace (talk) 08:52, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the reminder, but can you please Clean-Up all the Information as the Editor used to do on the Ang Probinsyano Page? like always updated. Billy Argenta (talk) 09:23, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Especially Ang Probinsyano (season 1 to 8) Billy Argenta (talk) 09:28, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hotwiki, alright then. I have your word. But, I still stand by my edits, even without those sources mentioned. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 06:24, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stand by your edits? meaning unreferenced edits, yeah no. Follow Wikipedia rules.TheHotwiki (talk) 07:01, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I take it that you won't have a problem explaining yourself to the administrators by still posting references from that Yera Calma of Twitter (which is not a verified account and reliable), after you've been not told to. These are recent edits after you've been warned.[8][9][10]

there must be sources about the ratings of every episode, but they are barely found anywhere than Twitter. Posting the ratings of every episode is no big deal at all, regardless of the sources. But, if you wanna have it your way, then fine! You win. You the man. You a better editor than me. You happy? ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 12:51, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

You reverted the deleted unreferenced edits. Simple as that. You don't need to restore it when you didn't have a reference to back up the information to begin with. TheHotwiki (talk) 12:56, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 17:30, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please soft block this user User:136.158.32.175 for making disruptive edits and not following how the main page of a series works like it’s supposed to be cast and characters but puts only cast instead. Hopefully you can find a way to do it. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.106.226.215 (talk) 00:03, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep in mind that

WP:SHARE). Those three are something suspicious. -136.158.32.175 (talk) 06:42, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

136.158.32.175, thanks for informing me regarding the IP users. They've been making disruptive edits in the articles of 2 of the TV series, in which I had them semi-protected. Unfortunately, I'm not an admin to take action on the IP users. It's best if you report them to WayKurat. I believe he knows what to do with the IP users you mentioned. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 14:42, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Could you please expand your closing statement at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:KWDC-LP? I find it hard to understand how you found consensus for something other than delete give the clear delete arguments. SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:24, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

alternative whatsoever. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 08:11, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Please revert your close on this, it's a clear supervote. SportingFlyer T·C 11:27, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

drop the stick and accept the consensus. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 12:03, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Thank you for the response. I've listed it at DRV. SportingFlyer T·C 17:53, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Sorry about this. I had an EC and sometimes they will correct themselves. I went back to add a replyto template and then when I came back it resolved itself. Apparently I overrode your post instead. :S Sorry! - Neutralhomer • Talk • 05:56, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Neutralhomer, that's alright. Such flaw is understandable since I can easily find my comment in the previous revisions and restore to where I used to post it. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 06:06, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Just glad some things are easily worked out. :) - Neutralhomer • Talk • 06:15, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. There are a couple of deletion discussions where I voted to redirect the articles to their networks as an ATD, but they ended up getting deleted instead. Do I have to take them to the DelRev to change the closer's mind? SBKSPP (talk) 01:37, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

be bold to create a new redirect to the desired target. It's that simple. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 15:00, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

@Superastig: Noted. Thanks for the advice. Will get to them soon. SBKSPP (talk) 06:18, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As an FM radio format, will Star FM's provincial stations of Bombo Radyo Philippines still carried a mass-based format despite being uses "It's All For You", which started to carrying the new slogan since the 1st quarter of 2016? Because I wanted to calling from Star FM Iloilo (Bombo Radyo's flagship FM station) on my cellphone 2 years ago that regional Star FM stations had switched to an Love Songs and Top 40 format (and some old stuff), and using English and Filipino as it's medium. Unlike Star FM Manila that uses "Like Mo, Share Mo" (since 2014) and still carried a mass-based format, which played OPM and foreign songs whether old and new, similar to other mass-based stations like 90.7 Love Radio, 101.1 Yes The Best, 91.5 Win Radio, 93.9 iFM and 106.7 Energy FM. However, all Star FM stations nationwide played some old stuff to it's regular playlist.

Boombastic061, every mass-based station plays a mix of Love Songs and Top 40 and old music. There were no changes on their playlist when Star FM's provincial stations started using "It's All For You". I've listened to Star FM Davao during my visit to the city back in 2019 and it's just like Star FM Manila. Therefore, even if you whine all day long, regardless of slogan or a mix of language they're using, ALL Star FM stations still carry a mass-based format. So, be it. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 01:40, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

List of Ang Dalawang Ikaw episodes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Ang Dalawang Ikaw episodes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

TheHotwiki (talk) 05:25, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Please let an admin close

Note to editor: see

WP:NOQUORUM when soft deletion is not eligible. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 16:15, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Bungle I disagree. The policy is crystal clear. "If the nomination has received very few or no comments but appears controversial to the closing administrator, or has been declined for proposed deletion in the past, the discussion may be closed at the closer's discretion and best judgement." This is followed by four possible outcomes, including soft deletion. Best.4meter4 (talk) 16:22, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry,

WP:NPASR. You shouldn't have reverted Bungle's closure (or even mine) in the first place. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 01:36, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

I personally think it's a controversial close for a non-admin to make, but given three others disagree I will acquiesce.4meter4 (talk) 03:25, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I would like to report these IP Sockpuppets that are unhelpful and suspicious. These IPs needs to blocked, or, you can investigate them, keep in mind and watching over them.

1.) For the past few months, the IP ranges of "

Thanks for informing me. It's best if you report those IP users and their disruptive edits at

WP:RFPP. I believe the admins can help you there. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 11:05, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Your welcome! Anyway, I would like to add more evidences against the sockpuppets of "58.69.105.139", "58.69.105.140" and "124.106.226.215". They are refactoring/editing others talk page comments by changing or removing it. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) -136.158.42.180 (talk) 11:37, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another IP 120.29.76.128, a sockpuppet of "120.29" (76 & 78)'s range, is also active since 21 August 2021. The IP sock's edits is copying or mentioning my contributions as a mock reference. -136.158.42.180 (talk) 02:41, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The "120.29" (76 & 78) IP-ranged sockpuppet is used by

sockpuppetry activites using multiple IPs, and is requesting consideration from the admins for the SeanJ 2007 account to be used as his main user account, because Sean's other account's "password" has been "reset due to shuffled password". -136.158.42.180 (talk) 05:19, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ang Dalawang Ikaw, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.TheHotwiki (talk) 05:08, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hotwiki, I actually did add some of them. And I intend to add more. Yet, you failed to see them. It took me a lot of time to dig deeper to the Pilot's episode. You weren't like this with Heartful Café. Don't be insensitive with my edits. 🙂 ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 06:42, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I looked what I deleted from your edits, and you only added those "Facebook links" as your source when you were warned twice today. Also it isn't anyone's job to look for references when you post unreferenced material in Wikipedia.TheHotwiki (talk) 11:48, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hotwiki, then you shouldn't have reverted my edits with the initial sources in the first place. I could've easily picked up where I left. It's not as easy as you think since it took me a lot of time to dig much deeper in the Facebook page to reach the link of the Pilot episode. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 15:27, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Again, I didn't remove any edits of yours that had a reference. I removed edits of yours that were unreferenced. You wouldn't even have added a reference to episode titles, if you weren't told again and again to add a reference. If you managed to find episode titles and post it in Wikipedia, it shouldn't be that hard to add it as a reference in Wikipedia. Wikipedia 101 - don't forget to cite your sources. You have been editing articles for years, without adding a reference. Are you going to add a references to the episode titles of Legal Wives, Nagbabagang Luha, The World Between Us as well they are unreferenced as well? Based on the edit history of the episode lists of those show, you added an unreferenced episode titles. Also you shouldn't make a separate article for episodes when the article of that show isn't even big to begin with. TheHotwiki (talk) 15:36, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Philippine Entertainment Portal

(or LionHearTV in some occasions). I honestly see nothing wrong with creating a separate article for episodes as long as they have no fixed number of episodes. Everyone has the right to create one. So, be it. I will not waste my time talking about it from hereon.

Also, I feel insulted when you told me that I have been editing articles for years without adding a reference. For my years of existence in Wikipedia, I know how to add sources. I'm not that stupid. I have created and edited several articles from music to radio to film and all of them are well sourced (setting aside episode lists), including some of the articles which survived the AfD. I make sure that I have enough sources to create every article and I document every article I created in my page. So, don't be judgmental with my contributions. I am telling the truth no matter what. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 02:50, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just keep posting credible references. Also learn not to post bare references. Thank you. TheHotwiki (talk) 03:02, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I see you pointed out that the Lisbo Afd was not closed properly. I was wondering if the same thing can be said of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AJ Raval that was closed 6 days ago. It was also closed by the same participant. Koikefan (talk) 01:33, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:DELREV. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 02:50, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Sounds good, just wanted to make sure. Koikefan (talk) 03:34, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bestman: 4 Better, Not 4 Worse is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bestman: 4 Better, Not 4 Worse until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Htanaungg (talk) 04:18, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:2011 NTC Listing (Page 23, Nueva Vizcaya).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:21, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:2019 NTC Listing (Page 3).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:22, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:2011 NTC Listing (Page 23, Nueva Vizcaya) Closeup.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:23, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I just updated

WP:G6 to move the content rather than the manual cut-and-paste procedure, which isn't tolerated. Thanks for the request, but I feel that this is not the right time to do that since there's no copy of the latest NTC listing yet. The previous listing listed the frequency under PA and I'm not sure if the mentioned call letter is in the recent listing. I heard an aircheck about it on YouTube, but it's not enough to be considered reliable. I'll get back to it once a copy of the recent listing is available. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 14:08, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft lacks a Reception section.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:Ang Babaeng Walang Pakiramdam
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  Draft:Ang Babaeng Walang Pakiramdam, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7
  }}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 06:38, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Superastig! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 06:38, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Superastig, please close this Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crystal Paras plsss. AnsrieJames9 (talk) 13:35, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that this user attempted to close the discussions

forum shopping. ✗plicit 14:17, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

WP:NACINV. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 12:12, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello, Superastig, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username ThadeusOfNazereth, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created,

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

ThadeusOfNazereth^{Talk to Me!} 09:25, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ThadeusOfNazereth, thanks for bringing this up. I created the article you mentioned, along with the 2 others in the discussion, as redirects to their respective owners since I barely found anything about them. Certain IP users created the content unsourced days ago and I wasn't aware of that. I'll participate in the discussion ASAP. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 10:48, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Astig - I always feel like I've either looked through the page history either too much or not enough! Probably should've caught that, though. ThadeusOfNazereth^{Talk to Me!} 10:51, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Superastig, I see you closed the

I'm afraid I cannot. It's clear that the "keep" votes have more weight than the "delete" and "merge/redirect" votes and the discarded ones. Despite how controversial the discussion is, the closure was well-thought, it took me a few hours prior to make a decision. So, it's best for you to

drop the stick and accept the consensus. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 16:24, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply

]