Wikipedia:Edit filter/False positives/Reports: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 05:25, 19 November 2021

Edit filter management
Tags management

Click here to report a false positive
To report a false positive affecting an editor other than yourself, click here instead.

TheCorricks

Username: TheCorricks (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing: Shaw Trust (filter log)
Description: update page with organisational information as page out of date and showing information correct in 2016
Date and time: 14:43, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Comments: Report fixed – An automated bot has fixed the page title in this report. (automated comment) —
talk · contributions) 14:44, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply
]; Private – One or more of the filters triggered are private, and the request needs to be evaluated by an edit filter helper or manager. (automated comment) —
talk · contributions) 14:44, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Error in filter?

This is not something that happened to me, it's just something I noticed while looking at the abuse log. If this should be somewhere else, please let me know and we'll remedy that asap.

I noticed while looking through the abuse log that someone trigged the filter by editing their own userpage. New users trip the filter if they edit javascript pages, but this probably shouldn't take effect on javascript pages that are on their own userpage.

Here is the link to the log: [1]

Thanks, ― Levi_OP^Talk 20:37, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Levi OP

Username: Levi OP (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing: Duncan Laurence (filter log)
Description: Unrelated to my post above
While reviewing the AbuseLog and reverting vandalism, the filter was tripped because I was restoring something that was blanked in an article. Maybe this should make sure that if nowiki tags etc are being added back, that it's not something being reverted from vandalism. Thanks.
Date and time: 21:45, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Comments

Not done – The filter is working properly. Ruy (talk) 03:24, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2A02:A464:2B19:1:900A:8E5C:1841:7FD7

Username: 2A02:A464:2B19:1:900A:8E5C:1841:7FD7 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing: The Bible and homosexuality (filter log)
Description
Date and time: 05:38, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
Comments: Report fixed – An automated bot has added the page title from last triggered filter to this report. (automated comment) —
talk · contributions) 05:39, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Consider requesting on the article's talk page; please provide the
necessary references. Ruy (talk) 03:24, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

2600:1700:d0a0:21b0:a00e:f5aa:e4e8:9861

Username

2600:1700:460:1390:74DF:B06C:7DFF:67C

Username: 2600:1700:460:1390:74DF:B06C:7DFF:67C (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing: SportsGuy789 (filter log)
Description: User SportsGuy789 is putting his own opinions into statistics pages. There is no evidence to suggest that COVID has impacted any sports leaders yet he is continually citing it.
Date and time: 17:28, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
Comments: Private – One or more of the filters triggered are private, and the request needs to be evaluated by an edit filter helper or manager. (automated comment) —
talk · contributions) 17:29, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Middle river exports

Username

Not done – The filter is working properly. Ruy (talk) 03:22, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Spaceman1996

Username: Spaceman1996 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing: Kosmos 1408 (filter log)
Description: adding the first publicly-available image of the debris cloud since the article had no pictures
Date and time: 22:33, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
Comments: Private – One or more of the filters triggered are private, and the request needs to be evaluated by an edit filter helper or manager. (automated comment) —
talk · contributions) 22:33, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

2600:1702:4960:1DE0:A83C:C5D3:22C0:A90F

Username

@@ Line 103: / Line 103: @@
 <!-- Please leave this area blank for now, but be prepared to answer questions left by reviewing editors. Thanks! -->
 :{{EFFP|p|bot=1}}<!-- 31332141 --> &mdash;&nbsp;[[User:MajavahBot|MajavahBot]] ([[User talk:MajavahBot|talk]]&nbsp;&middot;&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/MajavahBot|contributions]]) 22:33, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
+==2600:1702:4960:1DE0:A83C:C5D3:22C0:A90F==
+;Username
+: [[User:2600:1702:4960:1DE0:A83C:C5D3:22C0:A90F|2600:1702:4960:1DE0:A83C:C5D3:22C0:A90F]] ([[User talk:2600:1702:4960:1DE0:A83C:C5D3:22C0:A90F|talk]] <b>·</b> [[Special:Contribs/2600:1702:4960:1DE0:A83C:C5D3:22C0:A90F|contribs]]) (<span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:AbuseLog?wpSearchUser=2600%3A1702%3A4960%3A1DE0%3AA83C%3AC5D3%3A22C0%3AA90F filter log]</span>)
+;Page you were editing
+: [[WP:MOS talk]] (<span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:AbuseLog?title=Special:AbuseLog&wpSearchTitle=WP%3AMOS+talk filter log]</span>)
+;Description
+: I was posting a comment to a discussion, the broad topic of which was offensive language. The post contained a discussion of two words that are widely accepted as being very objectionable, with some graphic descriptions of some of the situations in which they were used that is the reason that they are as objectionable as they are. The words were contained in the post, in context, including an instance with an expletive also included. The point being made could not have been illustrated as effectively without their inclusion. Since they were clearly not used with any mal intent, nor were being used in any manner I other than within discussion about the words themselve (which is perfectly acceptable here), this was a false flag
+;Date and time
+: 05:25, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
+;Comments
+<!-- Please leave this area blank for now, but be prepared to answer questions left by reviewing editors. Thanks! -->