User talk:Gamingmaster83: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Content deleted Content added
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers
8,412 edits
+ ANEW notice
Line 43: Line 43:
:Look I'm sorry About all this I thought about it and you have a point But I have an message Tell him people not to edit tell us confirmed Isn't very nice. [[User:Gamingmaster83|Gamingmaster83]] ([[User talk:Gamingmaster83#top|talk]]) 06:31, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
:Look I'm sorry About all this I thought about it and you have a point But I have an message Tell him people not to edit tell us confirmed Isn't very nice. [[User:Gamingmaster83|Gamingmaster83]] ([[User talk:Gamingmaster83#top|talk]]) 06:31, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
:Besides isn't that what you all are doing. [[User:Gamingmaster83|Gamingmaster83]] ([[User talk:Gamingmaster83#top|talk]]) 06:33, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
:Besides isn't that what you all are doing. [[User:Gamingmaster83|Gamingmaster83]] ([[User talk:Gamingmaster83#top|talk]]) 06:33, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

== Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion ==
[[File:Information icon4.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring]] regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit warring]]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. [[User:AP 499D25|AP 499D25]] ([[User talk:AP 499D25|talk]]) 07:04, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:04, 17 March 2023

March 2022

Please refrain from attempting to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been disallowed by an edit filter. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- LuK3 (Talk) 23:09, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't edit anything that isn't true. Gamingmaster83 (talk) 23:10, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 13:44, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Suicide Squad: Kill the Justice League, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 07:19, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what you find wrong with my edits because they are true I'm just trying to get everybody informed, Obviously you don't give a rat's butt about accuracy So why don't you refrain From messing with my edits. Gamingmaster83 (talk) 07:24, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please remember to add proper sources and Wikipedia editing guidelines. And most of all, don't use personal attacks to your fellow editors. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 10:31, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Suicide Squad: Kill the Justice League. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Don't use middle finger, flipping the bird, emojis. Stop adding unsourced content. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 10:30, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I made no such threats Gamingmaster83 (talk) 10:42, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I tried adding a source but you wouldn't take it I added bloomingburg source but you didn't take it Gamingmaster83 (talk) 10:43, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, you did. Your edit summary consists of the 🖕 emoji. Emojipedia: "A middle finger emoji, used in some western cultures as a rude or insulting gesture." Wikipedia's article on the finger: "In Western culture, "the finger", or the middle finger (as in giving someone the (middle) finger, the bird or flipping someone off) is an obscene hand gesture. The gesture communicates moderate to extreme contempt, and is roughly equivalent in meaning to "fuck you", "fuck me", "shove it up your ass/arse", "up yours" or "go fuck yourself"." So my interpretation of your edit summary is that you were trying to tell me something inappropriate and I consider it to be a personal attack. If you think this is a normal way to treat others, Wikipedia might not be the place for you. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 12:38, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
😂 That's what you get when you keep reverting my edits that are true that I tried to put sources but you won't take them. How would you respond to someone treating you that way. Gamingmaster83 (talk) 12:41, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Like I said, Wikipedia is not the place for you if you think that's somehow okay. That's a personal attack. Don't do that.
Like Masem said, adding "ACCORDING TO bloomingburg it's delayed deal with it" to an article is nowhere near an encyclopedic treatment. I'm not here to clean up your mess. Add it properly or not. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK
Well maybe Wikipedia doesn't need to be on here then cause no matter what I put Even if it's up to you all standards You still undo it cause you don't wanna believe it. That's my issue. Gamingmaster83 (talk) 13:05, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-03-09/warner-bros-delays-suicide-squad-game-again-after-fan-backlash here's your source Gamingmaster83 (talk) 13:09, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please put new comments below, for readability. You think Wikipedia shouldn't be on... Wikipedia? ...Because you're not willing to add information properly? I hope you can edit constructively from now on. It's up to you. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 13:13, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Suicide Squad: Kill the Justice League. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 03:33, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For the final time: stop your disruptive editing. Do not insult others and follow consensus. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 03:35, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'll stop insulting people when people stop being idiots, besides I've done what you asked I haven't edited the silly date As instructed. Gamingmaster83 (talk) 05:05, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If anything I'll have you blocked. Gamingmaster83 (talk) 05:07, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It seems you have no real intention of working properly with others. You do not follow consensus or take the time to discuss things. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 05:54, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hey I'm open to work properly There's 1 thing I don't condone and that's stupidity I mean I haven't touched The release date since last time But if you're gonna put a message telling people that they cannot do on here than you are the problem not me. Gamingmaster83 (talk) 06:11, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Are you? You've responded with a middle finger emoji and called others idiots. You're insisting a hidden note is removed that says to wait for confirmation by the developer or publisher. What's the benefit in that? You're edit warring, as your edits show. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 06:15, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection
.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. AP 499D25 (talk) 06:28, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Look I'm sorry About all this I thought about it and you have a point But I have an message Tell him people not to edit tell us confirmed Isn't very nice. Gamingmaster83 (talk) 06:31, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Besides isn't that what you all are doing. Gamingmaster83 (talk) 06:33, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. AP 499D25 (talk) 07:04, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]