Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2024 April 27: Difference between revisions

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Content deleted Content added
Extended confirmed users
115,897 edits
Kys5g (talk | contribs)
Line 36: Line 36:


Re-reading [[WP:NFC#CS]], this comes down to "due weight" and "balance" provided by the article, even with two common circumstances. The "Composition" section seems as if it justifies using the sample, but it's more about the whole lyrics than what is entailed in the whole portion itself. Furthermore, even the lyrics of the chorus would be easier to summarize than perceived to be (difficult?). [[User:George Ho|George Ho]] ([[User talk:George Ho|talk]]) 21:58, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Re-reading [[WP:NFC#CS]], this comes down to "due weight" and "balance" provided by the article, even with two common circumstances. The "Composition" section seems as if it justifies using the sample, but it's more about the whole lyrics than what is entailed in the whole portion itself. Furthermore, even the lyrics of the chorus would be easier to summarize than perceived to be (difficult?). [[User:George Ho|George Ho]] ([[User talk:George Ho|talk]]) 21:58, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

:*'''[[File:Symbol delete vote.svg|15px|link=]] Weak delete''': The reason for deletion is too long. Not all users (include admins) understand the reason to support deleting (or deleting) the sample. As said on [[Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2024 April 22]], The render of contextual significance may vary per reader. [[User:Kys5g|<span style="font-family: sans-serif; font-weight: bold;">Kys<span style="background-color: rgb(50, 0, 129); color: rgb(255, 255, 0);">5</span>g</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Kys5g|<small> talk!</small>]]</sup> 02:55, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:55, 29 April 2024

April 27

File:Deftones - My Own Summer (Shove It) Disc 2.jpg

File:Deftones - My Own Summer (Shove It) Disc 2.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Seegoon (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Using two cover art not compliant with

WP:NFCC#3a. Preferring other cover art... George Ho (talk) 08:11, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Oops, accidentally used FFD rather than PROD. --George Ho (talk) 08:12, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mixed-Up Mother Goose cover.jpg

File:Mixed-Up Mother Goose cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mika1h (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

A freely licensed version of the image with VRT permission has been made available at File:SierraOnLine-Box-MixedUpMotherGoose-Original.jpg on Commons. Ixfd64 (talk) 16:09, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Daryl F. Gates' Police Quest - SWAT Coverart.png

File:Daryl F. Gates' Police Quest - SWAT Coverart.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Salavat (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Replaced with File:SierraOnLine-Box-SWAT1.jpg on Commons and no longer used. Ixfd64 (talk) 21:09, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Police Quest - SWAT 2 Coverart.png

File:Police Quest - SWAT 2 Coverart.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Salavat (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Replaced with File:SierraOnLine-Box-SWAT2.jpg on Commons and no longer used. Ixfd64 (talk) 21:52, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Weight, Band.ogg

File:Weight, Band.ogg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by FrickFrack (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The matter isn't whether the text and the sample are different or same. Well, I cited

the "minimal number of items" criterion
, which says that a non-free content must not convey equivalent significant information, as one of reasons for deletion. Text and sample may or may not provide same info, but I bet there'll be disagreements. The song title, the band name, and text content already suffice to convey same info that the sample does: what the song is expected to be, and what we can learn about the song before listening the actual recording(s). Compare those elements to those of a movie poster or a video cover art.

Actually, the bigger issue than that is the sample's (in)ability to be "

"critical commentary" rule
still wouldn't make the sample "contextually significant", IMO.

Re-reading

WP:NFC#CS, this comes down to "due weight" and "balance" provided by the article, even with two common circumstances. The "Composition" section seems as if it justifies using the sample, but it's more about the whole lyrics than what is entailed in the whole portion itself. Furthermore, even the lyrics of the chorus would be easier to summarize than perceived to be (difficult?). George Ho (talk) 21:58, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]