User talk:Favre1fan93: Difference between revisions

Archives

2012 - 2013 2014 2015

This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present.

Welcome to my Talk Page! If you are leaving a note, please remember to be personal attacks. Also, please remember to sign your message. Also, I reserve the right to alter or delete any and all submissions. This talk page is automatically archived, so if you don't see your thread anymore, please start a new one . Thanks!

I have no concrete proof as of now, but I can't help but feel this guys another User:TreCoolGuy clone. Music related name, same deep involvement with comic related articles. Just be on the lookout for any familiar edit patterns. RAP (talk) 01:02 17 June 2015 (UTC)

The protection just wore off. With release just days away, do you know anyone that can help?--TriiipleThreat (talk)

Hello, Favre1fan93. You have new messages at DonQuixote's talk page.
Message added 18:19, 13 August 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Hello, Favre1fan93. You have new messages at DonQuixote's talk page.
Message added 19:12, 13 August 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Hello, Favre1fan93. You have new messages at DonQuixote's talk page.
Message added 17:03, 14 August 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Everything on Wikipedia can be challenged. If you can't cite a reliable source when challenged, then it shouldn't be in an encyclopaedia article (

I think you might be misunderstanding what I mean by jargon.

From dictionary.com:

jargon: the language, especially the vocabulary, peculiar to a particular trade, profession, or group (emphasis mine)

From

wp:jargon

editors should try to make [topics] understandable to as many readers as possible

DonQuixote (talk) 19:51, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The phrase passes

WP:Jargon that's for sure. And it hasn't been challenged (unless you call what you're doing challenging it) because the editors who work on the articles of this shared universe, know that no name has been used in media, and definitely not one in all media. All we've ever gotten was "Arrowverse" (which definitely can't be used) and that could be expanded to "the Arrow universe", but even still, that is not a proper name for it. I suggest we get additional editors opinions regarding this matter, since the two of us seem to be going in circles and not making any strides. I'm open to suggestions to where you'd like to notify users to join a discussion. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 02:56, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

"Shared universe" doesn't pass wp:jargon unless you can show that it's widely used. "The CW's shared DC Comics TV universe" is an original (and therefore OR) name unless you can show that these shows are called that by the producers or by the majority of the media. Besides, why do you feel that there should be a name at all? They're adequately described as being spin-offs and related shows--terms that are used by every other such shows in the history of television. DonQuixote (talk) 12:05, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This doesn't take it for review. It just tags it so it appears on the AFC submission system. It's helpful in that if it becomes stale (no edits in a six month period), others will know what's going on (and can postpone any G13) rather than an admin possibly just deleting it outright. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 22:07, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) But it may encourage premature submission. You also removed Template:Draft article and by proxy Category:Draft articles, which helps editor locate them.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 22:57, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

G13 is for AFC submissions. Non-AFC drafts aren't eligible for deletion when stale. Tagging it as an AFC submission actually makes it more likely to be prematurely deleted. Reach Out to the Truth 23:04, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You recently restored a quote, "not to maniacally screw over customers—but because they believed it was good enough." to the

Hello, Favre1fan93. You have new messages at Talk:Batman: Arkham Knight#Anonymous source.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Bejnar (talk) 16:57, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

		The Accessibility Barnstar
		For your work on re}} 17:06, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply ]

Hi there, I did the music for the Consultant and Thor's Hammer with Paul and am appropriately credited in the shorts. Please do not remove the credit I added to the Wiki. Thank you! Howard Drossin

You yourself as a Wikipedia user can not claim such things per

reliable source stating such info. If you actually who you say you are, please do not edit the article again, per the WP:COI policy I linked. If you have further questions, you can respond here, or at the article's talk page. Thanks. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 03:49, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Here is a link to the actual short film. If you go to the end in the credit roll you will see Muisc by Paul Oakenfold and Howard Drossin. I'd think the actual film itself is a pretty reliable source. https://vimeo.com/45964463

Thanks for deleting useful info regerding agents of shield region 2 release, the world doesn't revolve around the US, the rest of the world might like to know when we can get our dvds — Preceding unsigned comment added by BENakaStig (talk • contribs) 13:13, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That is what Amazon or another retailer site is for. We aren't a shopping site. Please read

WP:TVINTL, which applies to this matter as well. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 15:51, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

So its ok for it to state the US release date but not the UK, because at the moment it does, also there's nothing in that link that says I can't put the UK release date and even if it did, it contradicts itself by stating the US release date — Preceding unsigned comment added by BENakaStig (talk • contribs) 19:15, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Now that I look more closely, you're probably right — it seems to just be an aggregator. I think we should remove it and try to find a third-party source beyond one reprinting the tweet. --Tenebrae (talk)

And then I looked even more closely and unreverted my self-revert. Turns out to be more complicated. I'm soliciting input from WikiProject:Film editors at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film#Is SSNInsider a reliable source?. --Tenebrae (talk) 03:41, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Tenebrae: This may be helpful to use should we choose to replace the SSN source. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:33, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm all for doing that now — it would take the issue off the table at CA:CW while the discussion about SSNInsider goes on (or begins; not a lot of traction there so far). Good find! --Tenebrae (talk)

Kalish beat me to it and added it to the article. It's there now, all archived and such. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 05:01, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Accidental rollback. Most people just fat-finger it, but nope; I had a cat-stepped-on-the-keyboard problem :) Opabinia regalis (talk) 05:07, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Opabinia regalis: Haha. That made me laugh! It's all good. Figured something like that must have happened. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 05:11, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think AoU implies what you are suggesting. There is no dialogue saying that they are quitting the team. it just shows them leaving the facility. IMHO, it's more likely that he his heading home for some much needed R&R after saving the world.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 06:37, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's true, but correct me if I'm wrong, they only show him going to his family, not a scene in which he's at the New Avengers facility and then leaves, to imply the R&R. Also, see this edit I made around the time AoU came out, and then hit next twice to see edits that Richie made regarding this. (And I believe that's how that text stated until the alliances came out a few days ago.) - Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:58, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you delete my edit in Batman Arkham Origins? Tanishbheem (talk) 12:10, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have added the source for filming having started on Luke Cage at the draft article, but I don't know how to sort out moving it over the redirect. - adamstom97 (talk) 02:32, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to remove the info at the moment, because the info traces back to here which I don't believe is reliable. And I checked OnLocationVactions (the site that aggregates filmings from users) and I don't see it there yet. I'll be on the look out in NYC too, but I'd say let's hold off for now. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 02:44, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I was under the impression that the working title from Production Weekly and the filming starting info were separate, since the Production Weekly site is just listing films and tv series in all stages of production (it includes things like Doctor Strange, which we know isn't filming yet). I had initially thought not to include it for the same reason you have, but after I read "Luke Cage is filming in NYC now" I thought it was a separate and seemingly definite statement. Also, there have been some separate, unreliable rumours about the series starting filming around now. I don't know what you think about all that though. - adamstom97 (talk) 03:08, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is tough for me to work through, because I read the Comicbook.com article as making the assumption that because we got the working title, then it means the show is in production. Even though we wouldn't be able to use it, On Locations Vacations is pretty good at collecting all the filming locations for a given day. I'd actually consider seeing how the rest of the week plays out, and see if OLV posts anything. If they make a post that Tiara is filming, I'd say let's figure out how to readd the info (and maybe another source will pop up). I'll ping @Richiekim: to this, see if they have any opinions on this. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 03:22, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think that because we are so uncertain, it is probably best to wait and see what else pops up. - adamstom97 (talk) 03:33, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah. But I'll definitely keep my eyes on this, and won't let it slip through. Just like I kept up trying to find a source for JJ wrapping and I finally did! - Favre1fan93 (talk) 03:34, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that JJ has wrapped also seems like a good indicator that something could be coming out soon. - adamstom97 (talk) 03:36, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes that too. Well we knew from Loeb back in July that they were prepping, because JJ was ending. So I think this is a good indicator to be very mindful of stuff in the coming days. Hell, we may get a press release from Marvel (doubt it since we didn't for either DD or JJ :/). - Favre1fan93 (talk) 03:43, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I would hold up on the page move, onlocationvacations.com does not appear to be a RS. Please find a better source before proceeding.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 20:08, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Favre, are you thinking of moving the page now with the new filming sourcing? - adamstom97 (talk) 22:11, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. But regardless, with all the casting announcements, I think it is acceptable to have in the mainspace. I've readded the deletion template to Luke Cage (TV series). - Favre1fan93 (talk) 22:14, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That was what I was thinking as well. - adamstom97 (talk) 22:21, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I can't respond to my previous message to you, since you removed it -- and you have never responded to any of mine.

But, it is my understanding that you are required to at least try to reach a consensus on edit disputes without wantonly undoing everything. In my previous message, which you deleted, I suggested you simply let your anger go. I was, indeed, angry when I realized it would cost me a day to try to put the production numbers back -- for what turned out to be no good reason since they are included for other television series. The production numbers were already there for this series as well, hence my anger at having to re-do such tedious work.

But, saying that the CBS Syndication Bible is a fansite is simply absurd. How is that defensible? It is the holy grail of information put out by CBS for people buying the series for syndication purposes. It has the CBS logo -- it comes from CBS.

So, if you do not accept that as a valid source of information, then what will you accept as a valid source of information? You owe me that much, if this should go do dispute, since, from my perspective, your actions seem quite arbitrary.

For one thing, if you do not like the source of the production numbers, you could flag this as a concern on the article, but let them there. The fact that you are not doing that makes your actions suspect, I would think.

So, let me know how to resolve this -- and if you do not, then I suppose all of my anger would be justified, going back to your original undo of my edits, then wouldn't it? I mean, your pattern of behavior is just more of the same as that -- completely arbitrary.

And, if you don't help to resolve this, them I guess I'll have to go to the arbitration process.

I realize you may know all of the powers that be on Wikipeida and the system might well be gamed, but this certainly is an interesting learning experience for me, regardless, concerning who the keepers of the information are out there.

It's worth the experience, for sure.

And it's scary, indeed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jompaul17 (talk • contribs) 01:55, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You again changed around the listing for the character Teedo claiming it wasn't a credited actor. The actor who plays him is mainly known for stunt and stand in work (he was in Return of the Jedi) however he has had bigger roles and this appears to be one of them because the bio for Teedo was added to the Force Awakens confirmed characters databank at starwars.com on Friday September 4th along with the other main actors. http://www.starwars.com/films/star-wars-episode-vii-the-force-awakens It's also not like there are two separate casts (which is why the cast listing adding Gwendoline Christie, clearly one of the stars, as a secondary cast member makes no sense and it's only this way because she wasn't involved in the very first announcement of cast members) for the movie. When the credits roll, his name will be listed among the names Harrison Ford and Adam Driver because he was a cast member. I also personally think it's worth mentioning the main villain, Kylo Ren (his image is plastered everywhere to promote the movie and is clearly the film's Darth Vader), should be mentioned in the premise/plot and not just the new and old heroes. We know he is the villain along with the First Order. Anyways...would rather continue this if so in the actual Talk section for the page, which is very empty and nobody is willing to ever discuss changes made.Jason1978 (talk 11:30, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Credited" meaning in the film's billing block. Per

WP:OR as no premise for the film mentions Ren or the First Order. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:48, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello Favre1fan93! Will you please take a look at 2020 in film, I don't know what MovieBarbie2009 is adding there. There's so much un-sourced and unknown material being added. --Captain Assassin! ^{«T ♦ C ♦ G»} 15:46, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Starting the move request in the talk page might be the best way. --George Ho (talk) 16:06, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Favre1fan93. Could you consider weighing in on this proposal at the List of Muppets discussion page? ~ Jedi94 (Want to tell me something?) 18:32, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

		Editor of the Week
		Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Wikipedia Editor Retention Project )

Editor [User:Yash!|Yash!] submitted the following nomination for

I cannot believe I haven't yet nominated Favre1fan93 to be Editor of the Week. I don't know where to start talking about this dedicated editor! He has been on Wikipedia for over three years. With more than 23K edits, he has been on a roll ever since he arrived. Nine DYKs, eight GAs and two FLs are just numbers to mention while talking about his work. He has been "super-active" on the articles of

You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:

{{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/Editor of the Week/Recipient user box}}

Thanks again for your efforts! . Buster Seven Talk 14:10, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]