Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests

If you are unable to complete a move for technical reasons, you can request technical help below. This is the correct method if you tried to move a page, but you got an error message saying something like "You do not have permission to move this page, for the following reasons:..." or "The/This page could not be moved, for the following reason:..."

If you are here because you want an admin to approve of your new article or your proposed page move, you are in the wrong place. If this is your first article and you want your draft article moved to the subst:submit}} to the top of the draft or user sandbox page instead of listing it here. Because you are autoconfirmed, you can move most pages yourself. Do not request technical assistance on this page if you can do it yourself. If you need help determining whether it's okay to move the page to a different title, then please follow the instructions at the top of Wikipedia:Requested moves.

Technical requests

Edit this section if you want to move a request from Uncontroversial to Contested.

Uncontroversial technical requests

• Estradiol/nomegestrol acetate (currently a redirect to Nomegestrol acetate/estradiol) → Nomegestrol acetate/estradiol (move · discuss) – WP:PHARMOS -- match order in drug Whywhenwhohow (talk) 19:42, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Salli (organisation) (currently a redirect to SALLI) → SALLI (move · discuss) – there's a redirect blocking the way. Thank you! Dr. Vogel (talk) 11:27, 11 June 2021 (UTC) Dr. Vogel (talk) 11:27, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• .NET Core (currently a redirect to .NET) → .NET (move · discuss) – .NET Core has now become .NET Angelangeles94 (talk) 02:30, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]

  This move presupposes the acceptance of the undiscussed primarytopic grab at .NET, which I have reverted. Discussion is in order. Dicklyon (talk) 02:43, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

difficult to see how this can be primary for .net In ictu oculi (talk) 10:28, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• High Dynamic Range (display and formats) (currently a redirect to High-dynamic-range television) → High-dynamic-range video (currently a redirect instead to High-dynamic-range television) (move · discuss) – Recent pair of moves with no significant discusssion, no RM process, which introduced over capitalization and a strange disambiguator. Dicklyon (talk) 21:22, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]

This pair of move

was discussed. The request to revert it couldn't go into the category "Requests to revert undiscussed moves". The move wasn't recent as it has been done for more than a month. The move was uncontroversial as no one objected for more than a month despite the discussion I opened. This technical request has been wrongly accepted as there is evidence of opened discussion. The technical request was controversial as I stated the reason in the discussion. The old title spread inaccuracy which is a serious issue. The technical request has been accepted so fast it didn't give me the time to move it under the contested technical resquests. Due to my lack of experience into such situation, I have made the mistake of going into a very complicated procedural mess instead of contesting the technical request that have created serious inaccuracy issue. I now demand for the revert of the unjustified technical request. If someone want to oppose to the new title, he should have have gone through a RM process giving proposition and arguments instead of filling false "request to revert undiscussed moves" even if he does it whith good intention. I do not object the good faith of anyone. SH4ever (talk) 21:40, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

You are compounding the procedural mess by trying to re-open it here instead of a proper RM proposal. Dicklyon (talk) 00:57, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Graham's hierarchy of disagreement. — SH4ever (talk) 02:29, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requests to revert undiscussed moves