Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/New page reviewer

Page semi-protected
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
< Wikipedia:Requests for permissions

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Kudpung (talk | contribs) at 06:10, 17 November 2016 (done (using userRightsManager)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

New page reviewer

Sorry,
create an account
in order to request user account permissions.
Shortcuts
See Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Reviewers for the granting guidelines. Applicants should show some evidence that they generally meet the guidelines outlined there, have a demonstrated need for the right, and that they have read and fully understood the tutorial at Wikipedia:New pages patrol.

User:Dcheagle

Have been reviewing new pages since 2010 on a semi limited bases thus I do not meet the reqs for being grandfathered in. Would like to continue to review pages when I come around them. Dcheagle • talk • contribs 08:23, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Automated comment An extraneous header or other inappropriate text was removed from this request — MusikBot talk 08:32, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Dcheagle: Since you have not nominated others' pages for deletion for years, please let us know when you have read Wikipedia:New pages patrol and Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:43, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ive already read NPP and even thougth I've read the other Ill go head and read through it again to be on the safe side.--Dcheagle • talk • contribs 00:58, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Graeme Bartlett: Ive gone ahead and read up on both subjects as asked, if there is anything else that needs to be done just let me know.--Dcheagle • talk • contribs 05:47, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Owais Khursheed

I have been editing wikipedia from couple of years and I have been patrolling numerous pages during the session successfully without any contested patrols from other users, so I request for this user right so I can continue my work as New PAGE Patroller on wikipedia. I have been inconsistent this year because of internet gag in my state but will continue my contributions as patroller as soon as internet suspension is over. Thanks.... User:Owais Khursheed 14:09, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Question: Are there any time limits to be observed before tagging articles? --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 20:09, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Agtx

I regularly help out with new pages patrol, so I'd like to be able to continue doing so. agtx 21:57, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like I might have gotten skipped over, so perhaps my request wasn't detailed enough. I have ~3700 edits in mainspace, and my CSD log should confirm that I understand the criteria for inclusion. agtx 15:05, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It probably got skipped over because no admin as yet could decide whether this editing profile constitutes 'regular', as you don't appear to have done any patrolling this year. I think it's best to see how regular your editing will be over the next four weeks which will also give you to time to get up to speed with the new tutorial, and then you can apply for the right again. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 20:22, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Kudpung: This is not entirely clear from the new guidelines, but it appears as though the intention is to restrict new page CSD tagging to those with the right. That's most of what I intend to do (in conjunction with anti-vandalism work), and it's why I said I patrol "regularly." I'd strongly prefer to be able to keep doing that, and I think my track record here shows that I can apply the rest of the new guidelines correctly when I do more general new page patrolling. agtx 00:48, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:10, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dan Koehl

During 2014 and 2015 I used to patrol new pages with Special:NewPages as the replaced NP Patrol, and have during 2016 regularly been patrolling new pages for some time with AWB, correcting spell errors and likevise, and will happily continue and increase this as New page reviewer with Special:NewPagesFeed. Dan Koehl (talk) 13:39, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
A concern I have is that non-harmful pages were nominated for speedy deletion too soon, in only a few minutes after creation. Dan Koehl can you prove that you have had a look at the guidelines, by pointing me to the place it talks about this? I would recommend that you patrol from the end or somewhere in the middle of the queue. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:08, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Superbeecat

Long time active NPP, Rollbacker, etc... been a while since I have been extremely active; I go through periods of inactivity when life gets busy. Long time anti-vandalism community member, no blocks or issues with admins. Would like to retain privileges to continue improving the project. - superβεεcat  01:48, 15 November 2016 (UTC)  superβεεcat  01:48, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note - I noticed that I still have the reviewer flag, but I received a message on my talk page that wasn't entirely clear on whether this is the old flag or not.
 Not done You've only made 27 mainspace edits in the last 10 months (all in early January) and never used the Curation tool. I would like to see more consistency with at least 500 mainspace edits over a period of six months, then you can apply again and we'll see how you have been doing.Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:47, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Nikolaiho

I want to become a new page reviewer, I have spent quite a bit of time working with vandalism and want to try something new. NikolaiHo☎️ 03:27, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Nikolaiho:, could you please explain what is wrong with this revision which you patrolled and with your edit of the same article. If you can give a comprehensive answer I am going to grant the right.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:45, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! I will be truly honest; when I first saw the article
credible claim of significance
which is notability is beyond. In retrospect, I should have made a PROD or AfD instead. Thanks.

User:Knight of Gloucestershire

Hi. I have been a user on wikipedia for a few years now and I am familiar with the system. I took a break from wikipedia due to real life commitments but I kept myself updated with all the major changes to the community nonetheless. I have patrolled many new pages in the past and I believe I will do good with this right as I am now experienced enough to step up and help in a more efficient and technical way.

Regards, Knight of Gloucestershire (talk) 13:18, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

mainspace. — MusikBot talk 13:21, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply
]
 Not done Keep up the awesome work and when you've hit 500 mainspace edits feel free to re-apply. Thanks! — MusikAnimal talk 18:39, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Naraht

To help with the backlog of New Page Reviewing. The current backlog is significant. Naraht (talk) 16:39, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
As additional information I have over 30,000 edits and have worked on AFC.Naraht (talk) 21:27, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Naraht: Thanks for offering to help. You seem to have never used page curation and haven't done manual patrolling since 2014. Please let us know when you have read the instructions. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:45, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:NotTheFakeJTP

I have been on Wikipedia for over two years, I have over 1300 edits (700+ in mainspace) and have been reviewing new pages for a few months now. I am also an active
AfC reviewer. JTP (talk • contribs) 17:29, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply
]
@NotTheFakeJTP: Does Wikipedia:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#A7 apply to film or fictional characters? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:30, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No, as the criteria specifically states "real people". JTP (talk • contribs) 00:02, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:SilverplateDelta

I am active in AFC, and I would like to reduce the 1.5k backlog in new pages feed. I have already curated around 30-40 new articles without any of them being contested. SilverplateDelta (talk) 17:41, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ntb613

I was invited to help with new page review backlog, am already AfC reviewer and will gladly help with NPR.
talk) 18:15, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

User:Dschslava
Received an invitation; I've been patrolling articles on-and-off for the past few months on Special:NewPagesFeed and AfC, and would like to be able to continue doing so in the future.
parlez moi 21:23, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply
]
@
Dschslava: Could you please read Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion and then explain why you should wait for a while before tagging an article with CSD A1, A3, or A7? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:21, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

User:Joseph2302

Work from time to time on New Page patrol, have been doing so for a year or more. New page patrol is about removing the obvious non-notable /spam/copyvios, and suggesting improvements to other articles. Maybe I meet the 200 criteria, probably not, but my history in this area should be sufficient. Joseph2302 22:26, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:JQTriple7

I believe I meet all the requirements. Rollbacker/AFC reviewer and done a lot of anti vandalism work. Did some NPP while it was open to everyone. JQTriple7 talk 23:12, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done I'm sorry, but I don't think this edit history demonstrates a need yet for the right or sufficient experience. Please apply again when you have made three consecutive months of significant regular editing and have read the page at
WP:NPR. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 20:29, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

User:Doncram

I am a very experienced editor with >100,000 edits mostly on historic sites-related articles but including more than 1000 AFD votes on all kinds of topics, and I want to do New Page Patrolling from time to time. I was trying New Page curation a month or two ago but I am sure I did not perform 200 curations so I would not be "grandfathered" in. Truthfully I am not sure what this "right" will allow me to do that I can't do right now, but I expect it will make something more visible for me or enable me to take a step that another doesn't have to review. (A few minutes ago I just used the NewPagesFeed tool to mark a new troll/vandal page for speedy deletion, and i saw that it was deleted promptly by another editor. What would happen differently with the right?) But just so that I can apply myself with the best ability available, I do request this right. Thanks in advance. doncram 00:36, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:FiendYT

I am sure I meet the specified criteria, being the holder of several other user rights and having 3000+ edits in total, but I'm not grandfathered. FiendYT ★ 02:00, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Question: Not suggesting you did anything wrong, but please take a look at
Cymru Sovereign. What, if anything, would you do to that article in its current state now? --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 20:36, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

User:CyanoTex

To be perfectly honest, I've had some pages tagged and I targeted pages that were orphans, had no Categories and had no References. I don't expect to get this right at all, to be honest, since I could be a little more active around Wikipedia. CyanoTex (talk) 10:47, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:TJH2018

I noticed that the creation of this ability removed my ability to patrol pages, so here I am. I mainly patrol pages, so the removal of this ability from the two days I've been gone is stunning...I'm probably grandfathered, but I am here just to be safe...TJH2018talk 16:56, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
There hasn't been a 'removal' per se. Pretty much everyone and anyone was able to patroll new pages, with or without experience. Such an arrangement was far from satisfactory, so a user right has been introduced in an endeavour to have new pages patrolled by people who can demonstrate they know what they are doing. I think you actually fall rather short of the criteria for grandfathering.
 Question: Why do you believe José Martí Gómez meets the notability criteria for BLP? --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 20:54, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Kudpung: José would meet the BLP guidelines, but should proabably still be in a draft state. Although he may be notable, there aren't enough sources, and the article may be too short in itself. More independent sources relating to his work in journalism would help its chances, and more references to existing content would be a must. I am just really surprised that this wasn't much notice given to the community, and in less than a week this feature was implemented. Also, I'm one of the few who clicked the "mark as patrolled," and if you take a look at my CSD log and patrol log, I think that I am very much qualified for this right. TJH2018talk 21:33, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 22:44, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Markdask

Hi - I've been a wiki editor for over nine years and I mostly gnome. I read voraciously on here and, having a tertiary level(+) command of the English language, I mostly correct syntax, grammar and punctuation. I also like to trawl through refs for integrity and relevence, though my alacrity in that regard is somewhat challenged; my knowledge of format is limited. I have occasionally expanded articles worth expanding, and also dipped a toe in the AFD world when I felt my contribution might help.

I had NPP rights prior to this new upgrade, though I confess I didn't often visit new pages space, but then I aint been very busy on here recently in any case.

I would like to renew the right because I am a fervent wikipedian with both the experience and temperament to promote that which is encyclopedic; I am a positive thinker and a fairly good communicator, therefore capable of enthusing new editors.

Lastly, I would like the right renewed because it is part of my schtick as a wikipedian - an emblem of authority that might matter to anyone who cares to check out my user page. Less experienced wikipedians are more likely to trust my judgement if I wear the appropiate badge.

Either way I love the medium, so it won't break my heart if I aint accorded the right. MarkDask 17:21, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:ThePlatypusofDoom

As an AfC reviewer, I got a message asking users to apply, so why not? I meet the editing guidelines. When I was a new editor, I tried to review, but didn't edit very well. I've learned from my mistakes, however, and I think I can help the project. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 19:23, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Based on this year's patrolls, you fell short of the criteria for the right. However, if you confirm here that you have read
the new tutorial, paying special attention to sections on interaction with other users, I'll be happy to accord the right. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 21:35, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply
]
@Kudpung: I have read the tutorial. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 21:57, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 22:00, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Samee

I got a message on my talk page sent by MediaWiki message delivery to active AfC members. I had previously patrolled new pages and I am requesting here to grant me this right so that I may help monitor the new pages. I think I did patrol after Jan 1, 16 but have not been granted the tool automatically.  sami  talk 19:29, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Bradv

I've been patrolling pages for years, and now it appears I've lost use of the Page Curation tool until I get this permission. Bradv 01:06, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Done — xaosflux Talk 03:22, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:LuK3

I've been patrolling Special:NewPages for a long time. I have experience both in page patrolling and CSD tagging. I believe I can benefit with patrolling new pages in accordance with notability and other article guidelines. -- LuK3 (Talk) 03:18, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Done — xaosflux Talk 03:20, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions/New_page_reviewer&oldid=749988317"