Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback

Page semi-protected
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
< Wikipedia:Requests for permissions

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Amorymeltzer (talk | contribs) at 02:29, 21 February 2019 (→‎User:Seby1541: Not done (via responseHelper)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Rollback

Sorry,
create an account
in order to request user account permissions.
Shortcuts
Please review Wikipedia:Rollback before making a request. Applicants with fewer than 200 mainspace edits are unlikely to be granted this right. More importantly, applicants must have a measurable track record of counter-vandalism and no recent history of edit warring. The counter-vandalism training program is available if you wish to gain experience in handling vandalism.

User:Bhunacat10

Please consider me for the Rollback right, to assist the recent-change patrolling part of my work. I have made over 60 reverts to date: Bhunacat10 (talk), 14:53, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Noyster and Bhunacat10: can you please confirm that this is indeed the same person as the Noyster account with an edit from Noyster? Thanks. TonyBallioni (talk) 05:26, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I am the same person TonyBallioni, but the Noyster account has become unusable due to mistakenly installed Javascript! But see Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)#IABot ascribing edits to wrong account: Bhunacat10 (talk), 09:19, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Bhunacat10, I’m sorry but I’m uncomfortable granting at this time. If it is a JavaScript issue, consider requesting an Iadmin like Amorymeltzer remove it so you can confirm the link between the two accounts. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:03, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Bhunacat10: fix ping. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:04, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Bhunacat10: Are you having trouble editing with your Noyster account? If so, log in and click this link to edit your javascript in safemode. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 16:13, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Amory, that's fixed it! However, I'll stick to the Bhunacat10 account now, and would be grateful to have the Rollback right attached to that. (I'm not seeking to reclaim Reviewer or Autopatrolled at this time): Noyster (talk), 16:43, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Done TonyBallioni (talk) 16:44, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:CAPTAIN MEDUSA

Last time I requested for rollback one of the admin said I needed more experience reverting vandalism edits. I think I've gained lot of experience on reverting vandalism edits. ___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 17:36, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([1]). — MusikBot talk 17:40, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Mr.Sarcastic

I have been editing in Wikipedia for almost a year. I come through various vandalized articles and i revert back those manually. I could really use this feature to just undo all at once.And also i follow a lot of articles in my watchlist and its hard for me to undo manually for every unsourced edit as well as vandalised edits done by IPs. Granting this right really save me a lot of time. That's said.

Thank you Mr.Sarcastic (talk) 14:13, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Automated comment An extraneous header or other inappropriate text was removed from this request — MusikBot talk 14:20, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:CalOtter

I am being trained by Operator873 in in the Counter Vandalism Unit Academy, and have reached the point when I am ready to apply for rollback. I have been using twinkle for a while, and meet the requirements for applying. Rollback will allow me to use STiki and Huggle to better detect and revert vandalism. Thanks! CalOtter (talk) 02:34, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Automated comment An extraneous header or other inappropriate text was removed from this request — MusikBot talk 02:40, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I support this request as trainer. Operator873talkconnect 04:18, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done for all intents and purposes, you've only really been active on Wikipedia for a week. I can't support granting this at this time. TonyBallioni (talk) 05:20, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Anish Mariathasan

Hello! I have been a Pending changes reviewer for some time now, and Rollback permissions would make it easier for me to combat vandalism. Thank you.
talk) 13:28, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

User:LPS and MLP Fan
Hello. I am LPS and MLP Fan. I have been on Wikipedia for 7 months, respectively. I would like to get the
talk) 19:48, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
mainspace. — MusikBot talk 22:50, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
 Not done. Please see the notice at the top of this page. With only 126 edits to the mainspace, I don't think you have sufficient editing experience yet. Take a moment to check out what counter-vandalism is at WP:CVU, and if you decide you'd like to get involved, you can enroll at the Counter Vandalism Academy to learn more. — JJMC89 (T·C) 22:51, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Shanze1

Hi.. I've been here for over a year now. Even though I was familiar with contributions on Wikipedia before, I started editing articles more frequently only few months ago. I have already made a considerable amount of contributions in few areas. I seem to like reverting vandal edits and I think I now have a good understanding on how to identify these things. Right now I use Twinkle to revert vandalism. I'd love to get Stiki to perform this if I can with the rollback rights. Shanze1 (talk) 13:15, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Seby1541

I have read the
talk) 15:49, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
 Automated comment This user has had 2 requests for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([2][3]). — MusikBot talk 15:50, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done You've certainly gotten more experience, but it's not clear to me you've really got this down. You're reverting some clear cut vandalism, which is great, although I note you are still rarely warning users, as noted in your decline less than two weeks ago. That's actually good, because a lot of your reversions are not for clear-cut cases of vandalism. There are a lot of what looks like reverting every unsourced or questionable edit a user makes. Some of these may be reasonable to revert, such as in BLPs, but a lot of them look like good-faith efforts on another editor's part to improve the project. I think you should slow down and only revert blatant vandalism for a while. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 02:29, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:LPS and MLP Fan

Hello. I am LPS and MLP Fan. I am pretty experienced with editing
talk) 22:05, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
mainspace. — MusikBot talk 22:10, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
 Not done The ink hasn't even dried on your declined request from two days ago, and the message from JJMC89 still applies. —DoRD (talk)​ 22:48, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions/Rollback&oldid=884352190"