Related changes
Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are shown in bold with a green bullet. See more at Help:Related changes.
List of abbreviations (help):
- D
- Edit made at Wikidata
- r
- Edit flagged by ORES
- N
- New page
- m
- Minor edit
- b
- Bot edit
- (±123)
- Page byte size change
- Temporarily watched page
2 June 2024
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 04:57 +2 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: dummy edit and apologies. What I’ve said is probably incorrect and it seems that a previous substantial edit is also a direct quote from Jimbo Wales (and not in the editor’s own words as I said). Thanks.)
1 June 2024
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 16:29 +16 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: better?)
- Undo
- Wikipedia:Nobody reads the directions) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 07:24 −354 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (It seems to me that substantial change was made to the policy by another editor using their own words. I’m not sure it’s what Jimbo Wales’ original statement means. I’m restoring the page to the last stable version (revision 1224068956). Please read this too. Thanks.) Tag: Manual revert
31 May 2024
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 12:14 +78 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: This part of Jimmy Wales original statement is fundamental to make clear the link with the fundamental notion of NPOV. In contrast, "reliable sources" can even be used to mean the opposite of NPOV as when people use "reliable" to mean "has a non biased point of view" and this incorrect use of "reliable" happens very often.) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 12:00 −13 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: The "scientific" is misleading when we do not have the historical context, which was a scientific OR. The general principle is not about scientific knowledge only. This historical context was added as footnote, but this is not sufficient.) Tags: Manual revert Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 11:54 −22 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (The notion of reliable sources was not discussed at the time. It's an important point, but not the key point.) Tags: Manual revert Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 07:00 +2 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: better) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 06:59 +20 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: restore important clarification (revision 1226458510).) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 06:51 +13 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: add per Jimbo Wales 2003 statement.) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 06:49 +276 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: add context for Jimbo Wales 2003 statement.) Tag: Reverted
30 May 2024
- Undo
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 19:33 +20 WhatamIdoing talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: Not a minority of editors) Tags: Reverted 2017 wikitext editor