User contributions for Dominic Mayers
A user with 10,308 edits. Account created on 26 October 2020.
4 May 2024
- 16:2916:29, 4 May 2024 diff hist +463 User talk:Dominic Mayers No edit summary
- 02:3502:35, 4 May 2024 diff hist +10 m Wikipedia talk:Neutral point of view →Delimitation in first paragraph
- 02:3102:31, 4 May 2024 diff hist +398 Wikipedia talk:Neutral point of view →Delimitation in first paragraph
- 02:1002:10, 4 May 2024 diff hist −7 m Wikipedia talk:Neutral point of view →Delimitation in first paragraph
- 02:0602:06, 4 May 2024 diff hist +113 Wikipedia talk:Neutral point of view →Delimitation in first paragraph
- 01:5701:57, 4 May 2024 diff hist +13 m Wikipedia talk:Neutral point of view →Delimitation in first paragraph: I meant to say that we do not write triviality such as "The earth is round" by itself.
- 01:5001:50, 4 May 2024 diff hist +782 Wikipedia talk:Neutral point of view →Delimitation in first paragraph: Reply Tag: Reply
- 00:0900:09, 4 May 2024 diff hist +4 m Wikipedia talk:Neutral point of view →Delimitation in first paragraph
3 May 2024
- 21:5721:57, 3 May 2024 diff hist +973 Wikipedia talk:Neutral point of view →Delimitation in first paragraph: Reply Tag: Reply
- 17:4717:47, 3 May 2024
diff hist −165
Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
Undid revision 1222065949 by Valjean (talk) The intention is not bad, but the formulation might be confusing. In a very important way, neutrality means that Wikipedia takes no POV: it does not support any POV. It only describes them by putting them in perspective, providing the arguments without taking side, etc.
current
Undo
1 April 2024
- 19:1919:19, 1 April 2024 diff hist +240 Talk:History of philosophy →The second paragraph in the section Definition and related disciplines
- 17:5017:50, 1 April 2024 diff hist +1,309 Talk:History of philosophy →The second paragraph in the section Definition and related disciplines: Reply Tag: Reply
- 06:4006:40, 1 April 2024 diff hist +1,227 Talk:History of philosophy →The second paragraph in the section Definition and related disciplines
- 06:0006:00, 1 April 2024
diff hist +8
History of philosophy
Undid revision 1216641762 by Dominic Mayers (talk) OK, it is a good article, but I removed a paragraph that created a strong POV.
Undo
- 05:5805:58, 1 April 2024 diff hist −1,339 History of philosophy →Definition and related disciplines
- 05:5505:55, 1 April 2024 diff hist −8 History of philosophy No edit summary Tag: Reverted
21 March 2024
- 18:0518:05, 21 March 2024 diff hist +294 Talk:History of philosophy →The second paragraph in the section Definition and related disciplines: Reply Tag: Reply
- 16:5916:59, 21 March 2024 diff hist −17 History of philosophy →Definition and related disciplines: More precise reference
- 16:5616:56, 21 March 2024 diff hist +4 History of philosophy →Sources
- 16:5116:51, 21 March 2024 diff hist +504 History of philosophy →Sources Tag: Visual edit: Switched
- 16:3316:33, 21 March 2024 diff hist +23 Talk:History of philosophy →The second paragraph in the section Definition and related disciplines
- 16:2716:27, 21 March 2024 diff hist +370 Talk:History of philosophy →The second paragraph in the section Definition and related disciplines
- 16:0116:01, 21 March 2024 diff hist +2,793 Talk:History of philosophy →The second paragraph in the section Definition and related disciplines: new section Tag: New topic
20 March 2024
- 15:4915:49, 20 March 2024 diff hist +42 Falsifiability →From Hume's problem to non problematic induction: Clarifying that the context is the logical side of science. The statement is certainly not saying that scientists and the society have no satisfaction when our dispositions succeed and our expectations are fulfill.
- 13:4113:41, 20 March 2024 diff hist +10 m Falsifiability →From Hume's problem to non problematic induction: Its a general induction rule that does not exist for Johnson-Laird
- 04:4904:49, 20 March 2024 diff hist +158 Talk:Falsifiability →Headings
- 04:3904:39, 20 March 2024 diff hist +486 Talk:Falsifiability →Headings: Reply Tag: Reply
19 March 2024
- 07:5507:55, 19 March 2024 diff hist +61 m Falsifiability →The elusive distinction between the logic of science and its applied methodology: Broke a statement in few smaller statements.
17 March 2024
- 15:5015:50, 17 March 2024 diff hist −2 m Falsifiability →From Hume's problem to non problematic induction
- 02:5102:51, 17 March 2024 diff hist +10 m Falsifiability No edit summary
16 March 2024
- 21:5121:51, 16 March 2024 diff hist +27 Falsifiability →The elusive distinction between logic and methodology
- 19:2519:25, 16 March 2024 diff hist +28 Falsifiability →The elusive distinction between logic and methodology: Another version
- 19:1819:18, 16 March 2024 diff hist +23 Falsifiability →The elusive distinction between logic and methodology: Clearer statement.
- 14:3214:32, 16 March 2024 diff hist +672 Falsifiability →The elusive distinction between logic and methodology: Added a source that verifies the elusiveness of this distinction even today. Tag: Visual edit
- 13:5113:51, 16 March 2024 diff hist +58 m Falsifiability →Basic statements and the definition of falsifiability: This first part of the section on basic statements and definition is actually about a key point that deserves a section on its own.
- 07:0407:04, 16 March 2024 diff hist −156 Falsifiability →The problem of induction and demarcation: Remove a sentence about the use of conjecture that is better introduced in the next paragraph. It does not fit in that paragraph.
15 March 2024
- 19:3519:35, 15 March 2024 diff hist 0 m Falsifiability No edit summary
- 18:4418:44, 15 March 2024 diff hist +4 m Falsifiability No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
- 18:4318:43, 15 March 2024 diff hist +9 m Falsifiability No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
- 18:4218:42, 15 March 2024 diff hist +2 Falsifiability Rephrasing a bit
- 18:0418:04, 15 March 2024 diff hist +15 m Falsifiability induction per se is not a problem.
- 17:5317:53, 15 March 2024 diff hist −139 Falsifiability Removed Mayo's criticism because it is not a part of the main confusion that is central to the subject. It is actually one of the valid criticisms. Also reorganized so that the logic is simpler to see.
- 17:1717:17, 15 March 2024 diff hist +25 m Talk:Falsifiability →The lede
- 17:1517:15, 15 March 2024 diff hist +1,012 Talk:Falsifiability →The lede
- 12:2812:28, 15 March 2024 diff hist 0 m Talk:Falsifiability →The lede
- 12:0512:05, 15 March 2024 diff hist +2,457 Talk:Falsifiability →The lede: Reply Tag: Reply
14 March 2024
- 21:4721:47, 14 March 2024 diff hist +244 Falsifiability →Basic statements and the definition of falsifiability
- 15:3615:36, 14 March 2024 diff hist +46 Falsifiability →From Hume's problem to non problematic induction: Some clarifications.
- 15:1915:19, 14 March 2024 diff hist +26 m Falsifiability →Basic statements and the definition of falsifiability
- 15:1715:17, 14 March 2024 diff hist −1 m Falsifiability →Basic statements and the definition of falsifiability