A connection on a spinor bundle
In
rotations
.
The spin connection occurs in two common forms: the Levi-Civita spin connection, when it is derived from the Levi-Civita connection, and the affine spin connection, when it is obtained from the affine connection. The difference between the two of these is that the Levi-Civita connection is by definition the unique torsion-free connection, whereas the affine connection (and so the affine spin connection) may contain torsion.
Definition
Let be the local Lorentz
vierbein
(also known as a tetrad), which is a set of orthonormal space time vector fields that diagonalize the metric tensor
where
is the spacetime metric and
is the
Minkowski metric. Here, Latin letters denote the local
Lorentz frame indices; Greek indices denote general coordinate indices. This simply expresses that
, when written in terms of the basis
, is locally flat. The Greek vierbein indices can be raised or lowered by the metric, i.e.
or
. The Latin or "Lorentzian" vierbein indices can be raised or lowered by
or
respectively. For example,
and
The torsion-free spin connection is given by
where
are the
Christoffel symbols. This definition should be taken as defining the torsion-free spin connection, since, by convention, the Christoffel symbols are derived from the
Levi-Civita connection, which is the unique metric compatible, torsion-free connection on a Riemannian Manifold. In general, there is no restriction: the spin connection may also contain torsion.
Note that using the gravitational covariant derivative of the contravariant vector . The spin connection may be written purely in terms of the vierbein field as[1]
which by definition is anti-symmetric in its internal indices
.
The spin connection defines a covariant derivative on generalized tensors. For example, its action on is
Cartan's structure equations
In the
(that is, they are the same equations, but in a different setting and notation).
Writing the vierbeins as differential forms
for the orthonormal coordinates on the
cotangent bundle, the affine spin connection one-form is
The
torsion 2-form is given by
while the
curvature 2-form is
These two equations, taken together are called
Cartan's structure equations.
[2]
Consistency requires that the
Bianchi identities
be obeyed. The first Bianchi identity is obtained by taking the exterior derivative of the torsion:
while the second by differentiating the curvature:
The covariant derivative for a generic
differential form of degree
p is defined by
Bianchi's second identity then becomes
The difference between a connection with torsion, and the unique torsionless connection is given by the
contorsion tensor. Connections with torsion are commonly found in theories of
teleparallelism,
Einstein–Cartan theory,
gauge theory gravity and
supergravity.
Derivation
Metricity
It is easy to deduce by raising and lowering indices as needed that the
frame fields
defined by
will also satisfy
and
. We expect that
will also annihilate the Minkowski metric
,
This implies that the connection is anti-symmetric in its internal indices,
This is also deduced by taking the gravitational covariant derivative
which implies that
thus ultimately,
. This is sometimes called the
metricity condition;
[2] it is analogous to the more commonly stated metricity condition that
Note that this condition holds only for the Levi-Civita spin connection, and not for the affine spin connection in general.
By substituting the formula for the Christoffel symbols written in terms of the , the spin connection can be written entirely in terms of the ,
where antisymmetrization of indices has an implicit factor of 1/2.
By the metric compatibility
This formula can be derived in another way. To directly solve the compatibility condition for the spin connection , one can use the same trick that was used to solve for the Christoffel symbols . First contract the compatibility condition to give
Then, do a cyclic permutation of the free indices and , and add and subtract the three resulting equations:
where we have used the definition
. The solution for the spin connection is
From this we obtain the same formula as before.
Applications
The spin connection arises in the
Dirac matrices
are contracted onto vierbiens,
We wish to construct a generally covariant Dirac equation. Under a flat tangent space Lorentz transformation the spinor transforms as
We have introduced local Lorentz transformations on flat tangent space generated by the 's, such that is a function of space-time. This means that the partial derivative of a spinor is no longer a genuine tensor. As usual, one introduces a connection field that allows us to gauge the Lorentz group. The covariant derivative defined with the spin connection is,
and is a genuine tensor and Dirac's equation is rewritten as
The generally covariant fermion action couples fermions to gravity when added to the first order tetradic Palatini action,
where
and
is the curvature of the spin connection.
The tetradic Palatini formulation of general relativity which is a first order formulation of the Einstein–Hilbert action where the tetrad and the spin connection are the basic independent variables. In the 3+1 version of Palatini formulation, the information about the spatial metric, , is encoded in the triad (three-dimensional, spatial version of the tetrad). Here we extend the metric compatibility condition to , that is, and we obtain a formula similar to the one given above but for the spatial spin connection .
The spatial spin connection appears in the definition of Ashtekar–Barbero variables which allows 3+1 general relativity to be rewritten as a special type of
Yang–Mills
gauge theory. One defines
. The Ashtekar–Barbero connection variable is then defined as
where
and
is the extrinsic
curvature and
is the
Immirzi parameter. With
as the configuration variable, the conjugate momentum is the densitized triad
. With 3+1 general relativity rewritten as a special type of
Yang–Mills gauge theory, it allows the importation of non-perturbative techniques used in
Quantum chromodynamics to canonical quantum general relativity.
See also
References
- Hehl, F.W.; von der Heyde, P.; Kerlick, G.D.; Nester, J.M. (1976), "General relativity with spin and torsion: Foundations and prospects", Rev. Mod. Phys. 48, 393.
- , J. Math. Phys. 2, 212.
- Sciama, D.W. (1964), "The physical structure of general relativity", Rev. Mod. Phys. 36, 463.