Stoddard v. Martin

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Stoddard v. Martin
CourtRhode Island Supreme Court
Full case nameMartin Stoddard v. Wheeler Martin
DecidedMarch 1828
Court membership
Judge(s) sittingSamuel Eddy

Stoddard v. Martin

.

Background

On October 26, 1826 plaintiff Martin Stoddard bet former

Ashur Robbins would be elected to the United States Senate
. Plaintiff and defendant drew their respective checks for the amount of fifty dollars each check, and delivered both of said checks to a stakeholder, to be delivered to the party that won the bet. The plaintiff won the bet.

Stoddard received a check from Martin on October 26, 1826. On March 5, 1827 Stoddard requested the cashier of Eagle Bank in Providence to pay him the $50 from the check, who refused to pay. On the same day the plaintiff gave the defendant notice, whereby the defendant became liable. A jury awarded the plaintiff the amount bet, plus interest and costs.

On appeal the court reversed the decision stating a bet was void on principles of policy. The court further found that the bet could have produced corruption and debased the character of the individuals.

Holding

In the Court's first officially recorded decision, Chief Justice

Ashur Robbins won) was a void contract as against public policy because of its immorality.[1]

Chief Justice Eddy cited British

Da Costa v. Jones
(Cowp. 720); Bunn v. Riker (4 Johns. 428); Lansing v. Lansing (8 Johns. 454).

References

  1. ^ Stoddard v. Martin, 1 R.I. 1 (1828)