String Quartet No. 10 (Shostakovich)

The first movement is in sonata rondo form and makes use of soft dynamics. Opening with a four-note motif on solo violin,^[1][4] the movement is largely written in E minor, a minor sixth away from the main key of A-flat major. This E minor/A-flat major dialogue recurs throughout the quartet. Themes in both keys are heard separately, then simultaneously, before being recapitulated in A-flat.^[2]

It also features

A typical performance takes around 5 minutes.[4]

II. Allegretto furioso

The second movement is in E minor and makes extensive use of the

A typical performance takes around 5 minutes.[4]

III. Adagio (attacca)

The third movement is written in A minor, a semitone away from the tonic A-flat major,^[2] although it also employs the A-flat major and E minor tonalities which recur throughout the work. It is written in the passacaglia form, frequently used in Shostakovich's music, and described as an example of the influence of Baroque period composition on his work.^[6] The passacaglia theme is developed, played with and without ground bass, and with added bars and beats throughout the movement. It also features a self-quote of the 'hymn motif' of his Fourth Quartet.^[2]

A typical performance takes around 7 minutes.^[4]

IV. Allegretto – Andante

The fourth movement is continuous from the third, played with no pause in between. It is written in A-flat major, the tonic key of the work. It also employs

A typical performance takes around 9 minutes.^[4]

Composition

The string quartet was dedicated to Polish composer Mieczysław Weinberg, a close friend and pupil of Shostakovich. The composers had a mutually influential relationship, as well as a degree of rivalry, which, in part, motivated the dedication.^[7] In 1964, Shostakovich wrote:

[Weinberg] wrote nine quartets and with the last of them overtook me, since at the time I only had eight. I therefore set myself the challenge of catching up and overtaking Weinberg, which I have now done.^[8]

The string quartet is written in the traditional four movements, his only quartet composed after his

The work was composed over ten days[4] at the Dilijan composers' retreat in Armenia.^[10]

Some of Shostakovich's works at the time had been subject to condemnation by the Communist Party. His opera Katerina Izmailova was a 1962 revision of Lady Macbeth of the Mtsensk District, which had been banned by the Communist government in 1936. Because of this controversy, it premiered with no publicity. Similarly, his Thirteenth Symphony was censored for its sympathy to the Jewish survivors of the Babi Yar massacres.^[4] Ian MacDonald wrote that an attitude of "disgust" to this reception shaped the "puritanical fury" found in the Tenth String Quartet.^[5] The formal choice itself to increasingly compose string quartets over symphonies has been used to support this reading of his work, due to the fact that the string quartet and other chamber forms do not appear on the official list of Soviet genres.^[3]

Reception

Its anxious mood has been linked to Shostakovich's declining physical health at the time of composition.^[1] Its sparseness has also been suggested to in part result from his health issues and a consequent inability to handwrite complex lines.^[5]

Approaches which view the work through the lens of Shostakovich's health or relationship to the government have been described as reductive, such as by critic Thomas May, who wrote that this criticism "tends to obscure the musical and artistic experience" and does not account for the "profound sense of ambivalence" the work contains in spite of its aggressive moments.^[1] The quartet has also been interpreted as a representation of the struggle between evil, represented by the theme of the second furioso movement, and human emotions. In this interpretation, the lack of this theme in the fourth movement, where all the other themes are restated, symbolises the possibility of overcoming evil. This interpretation has, however, also been criticised as reductive.^[4] The quartet's similarity in structure and melodies to other Shostakovich works has led some critics to describe it as a relatively insignificant composition, such as Ian MacDonald, who wrote in The New Shostakovich that it lacks "the depth or breadth of [its] finest predecessors".^[5]

Other critics are more positive, such as Richard Taruskin, who described MacDonald's book as a 'travesty', and suggesting that his dismissal of the Tenth Quartet results from a flawed, overly biographical approach to the composer.^[3] Additionally, Judith Kuhn wrote that the quartet's second movement is 'perhaps the most successful and exciting of the composer’s attempts to use the string quartet to depict large-scale conflict'.^[2]

Influence

The work was

The work was premiered by the Beethoven Quartet in Moscow in 1964. Following this, it was premiered in the UK by the Alberni Quartet in 1966. Over twenty recordings of the work have been made, the first by the Weller Quartet in 1965.^[10] These also include recordings by ensembles that Shostakovich knew and worked with,^[12] such as the Borodin Quartet, the Beethoven Quartet, both of whom have released multiple recordings of the work, and the Fitzwilliam Quartet, who recorded it in 1998.^[4] Several recordings have also been made of Rudolf Barshai's arrangement for string orchestra, including by the Kiev Virtuosi, conducted by Dmitry Yablonsky in 2017 and the Dmitri Ensemble, conducted by Graham Ross, in 2015.^[11]

References