Superficiality
This article is written like a personal reflection, personal essay, or argumentative essay that states a Wikipedia editor's personal feelings or presents an original argument about a topic. (September 2020) |
What social psychologists call "the principle of superficiality versus depth"[1] has pervaded Western culture since at least the time of Plato.[2]
Historical sketch
Modernist cross-currents
By contrast,
His (still) preference for superficiality was however over-shadowed for most of the 20th century by
Postmodernism
In the last third of the 20th century,
That process of substitution was well under way by the 1990s, when notoriously "surface was depth",[15] and in the new millennium has led to a state of what has been called hypervisibility: everything is on view.[16] In this new era of exposure[17] we are all submerged in what the psychoanalyst Michael Parsons has called "the totalist world where there is a horror of inwardness; everything must be revealed".[18]
If postmodernism's proponents welcomed the way a new transcendence of the surface /depth dichotomy allowed a fuller appreciation of the possibilities of the superficial
Therapy
Almost all
Social processing
Some circumstances however necessitate a shift from superficial to extensive processing. When things become serious, we must put more and deeper thought into understanding, leaving superficial judgements to cases where the stakes are low, not high.[32]
In the media
- Entertainer Bill Hicks often criticized consumerism, superficiality, mediocrity, and banality within the media and popular culture, describing them as oppressive tools of the ruling class, meant to "keep people stupid and apathetic."[33]
- Web 2.0 in particular is often seen as specifically fostering superficiality, replacing deep, measured analysis by noisy but unfiltered observation.[34]
- Baudrillard, would return to the image of America as a shallow, cultureless desert, only to praise it in postmodern terms "because you are delivered from all depths there – a brilliant, mobile, superficial neutrality".[36]
- Pride and Prejudice has been analysed in terms of the movement from the superficiality of Elizabeth Bennet's initially favourable appraisal of Whickham – her first impressions – to her deeper realisation of the value of Mr Darcy.[37]
See also
- Acedia
- Blunted affect
- Celebrity culture
- Chic
- Dumbing down
- Emotional intelligence
- Ersatz
- Hyperreality
- Imaginary order
- One-Dimensional Man
- Platitude
- Sheeple
- Silliness
- Superficial
- Superficial charm
- Superficial sympathy
References
- ^ E. R. Smith/D. M. Mackie, Social Psychology (2007) p. 18-9
- ^ Jacques Lacan, The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psycho-Analysis (Penguin 1994) p. 71 and p. 112
- ^ Kathryn A. Morgan, Myth and Philosophy from the pre-Socratics to Plato (2000) p. 229
- ^ M. R. Gladstein/C. M. Sicabarra, Feminist Interpretations of Ayn Rand (1999) p. 130
- ^ A. De Riencout, Sex and Power in History (1974) p. 268
- ^ Catherine Cusset, No Tomorrow (1996) p. 74
- ^ G. D. McCracken, Transformations (2008) p. 219
- ^ Quoted in Gregory Castle, The Blackwell Guide to Theory (OxfordLiteraryironic 2007) p.
- ^ A. Bennett/N. Royle, An Introduction to Literature, Criticism and Theory (2004) p. 253-4
- ^ M. Hardt/K. Weeks eds., The Jameson Reader (2000) p. 17 and p 193
- ^ K. Chrome/J. Williams ed., The Lyotard Reader and Guide (2006) p. 24-8
- ^ Cusset, p. 87
- ^ R. Appignanesi/C. Garratt, Postmodernism for Beginners (1995) p. 135-6
- ^ Fredric Jameson, Postmodernism (London 1991) p. 2 and p. 12
- ^ Michael Bracewell, The Nineties: when surface was depth (London 2003)
- ^ Kim Toffoletti, Baudrillard Reframed (London 2011) p. 32
- ^ L. Magid/A. Collier, Myspace (2007) p. 22
- ^ Michael Parsons, The Dove that Returns, the Dove that Vanishes (London 2000) p. 85
- ^ Russell De Manning, Theology at the End of Culture (2005) p. 180
- ^ E. D. Ermath, Sequel to History (Princeton 1992) p. 188
- ^ J. G. Ballard, Millennium People (London 2003) p. 294
- ^ David Edwards, Burning All Illusions (1996) p. 194
- ^ David Cooper, The Death of the Family (Penguin 1974) p. 13
- ^ Patrick Casement, Further Learning from the Patient (London 1997) p. 169
- ^ David Sedgwick, Introduction to Jungian Psychotherapy (2006) p. 153
- ^ Frederick Perls, Gestalt Therapy Verbatim (1972) p. 57
- ^ Jonathan Lear, in Parsons, p. 24
- ^ Lear, in Parsons, p. 24-5
- ^ Smith/Mackie, p. 18 and p. 92-3
- ^ John O'Neill, Sociology as a Skin Trade (London 1972) p. 173
- ^ Smith/Mackie, p. 325
- ^ Smith/Mackie, p. 554
- ^ See "Bill Hicks on Austin Public Access", October 24, 1993, via Vide.Google.com
- ^ Andrew Keen, The Cult of the Amateur (2008) p. 16 and p. 213
- ^ Adam Phillips, On Flirtation (London 1994) p. xxi
- ^ Quoted in Stuart Sim ed., The Routledge Companion to Postmodernism (London 2001) p. 194
- ^ Tony Tanner, 'Introduction', Jane Austen, Pride and Prejudice (Penguin 1972) p. 11-24
Further reading
- Anthony Elliott, Subject to Ourselves (1996)
- William Hazlitt, "On Depth and Superficiality" in Selected Essays of William Hazlitt (2004)
- Herbert Marcuse, One-Dimensional Man (1964)
- ISBN 978-0-9555176-0-0
- Sir Richard Winn Livingstone, Superficiality in education (1957)