Talk:1669–1670 papal conclave

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
WikiProject iconEuropean Microstates: Vatican City High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject European Microstates, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of European Microstates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Vatican City (assessed as High-importance).
WikiProject iconCatholicism Mid‑importance
WikiProject icon1669–1670 papal conclave is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
for Catholicism articles
WikiProject iconElections and Referendums
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.
Scipione Pannocchieschi d’Elci
became so embarrassed that it was said to be the cause of his death shortly thereafter?

Cardinal-Bishop

It is clear from looking at the table that someone misunderstands the term "Cardinal-Bishop". This Conclave had only 6 Cardinals with the Cardinal Rank of Bishop.--Dcheney (talk) 00:50, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Title

Shouldn't the title of this article be

MOS:DATERANGE? The Rambling Man (talk) 12:34, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

The Rambling Man, since they are consecutive years. MOS seems to allow for the current format. If you prefer the four digit format, I can round-robin the pages. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:24, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No, that's cool, I hadn't seen that clause. Cheers for the pointer. The Rambling Man (talk) 15:03, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]