Talk:23rd century

Futures studies High‑importance

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Futures studies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Futures studies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Futures studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Futures studiesTemplate:WikiProject Futures studiesfutures studies articles High This redirect has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080617075311/http://news.zdnet.co.uk:80/internet/0,1000000097,39228011,00.htm to http://news.zdnet.co.uk/internet/0,1000000097,39228011,00.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—

I think it would be cleaner not to intersperse the original and alternate Star Trek chronologies. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 01:29, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

what movies will be in the 23rd century? i find only "films that set in the 23rd century" but i don't find films that will be in the 23rd century why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.121.245.99 (talk) 13:33, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You better learn proper English, unsigned editor: we say "(...) in the 23rd century?", with the article "the" clearly present. --Fandelasketchup (talk) 15:44, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Who the F.. would say "film" instead of "movie" or use British spellings like "colonises" in a clearly American website? I do not know if you knew this but, even though there are many varieties of English, given the fact the Wikimedia Foundation is based in the US, and not in the UK, American spellings such as "colonizes" are to be preferred over "colonises" or similar British spellings. You can't simply be undoing other editors' work without explanation.--Fandelasketchup (talk) 15:39, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The reason why I said what I said above is because the post above mine asks "What movies (not 'films') will there be in the 23rd century?" in its subject line --Fandelasketchup (talk) 15:42, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why must we use Arabic numbers in English to represent centuries (as in the title of this talk page) when all other languages use Roman numerals to represent them (i.e. "siglo XXIII" in Spanish)? --Fandelasketchup (talk) 18:28, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That's not a Wikipedia issue, that's an English issue beyond the scope of this talk page. Ian.thomson (talk) 23:11, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

what disney movies will be in the 23rd century? i wonder what disney movies will be in the future centuries why there are only movies that set in the future centuries but not movies that will be in the future centuries? i hope there will be disney movies in the future centuries — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:A040:181:2CEF:7CFF:9A34:A3CE:3564 (talk) 17:21, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't we combine the two sentences of "According to Jewish Calendars" to be one, so that it says "According to Jewish Calendars, in 2214, Rosh Hashanah will fall on October 6 for the first time and will fall in 2260 on September 6 for the last time"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by AnanaBcinesrA (talk • contribs) 15:04, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]