Talk:A New Day in the Old Town/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GRAPPLE X 19:54, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply
]


I see a previous attempt at this appears to have been deleted. Let's hope I'm not doing anything wrong here then...

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B.
    lists
    :
    Reviewed a few of these Fringe eps now, and as always, the prose style and MOS are both perfectly fine.
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A.
    References to sources
    :
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
    Citations and references are grand, everything's cited and sound.
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
    Scope's fine - not too narrow or too broad.
  4. Is it
    neutral
    ?
    Fair representation without bias:
    Neutrality is perfectly fine.
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
    History is hassle-free and stable.
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have
    fair use rationales
    :
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with
    suitable captions
    :
    Sole image is used well and fair use seems fine.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    Unsurprisingly, this article will pass as a Good Article. Well done.