Talk:Administration (law)/Archives/2013

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Untitled

In light of recent economic events, this subject has grown in importance - not to say that it was ever /un/important - and I do not understand why it has been assessed as being of low importance. It is not merely business-related either; it has obvious legal and political implications.

Moreover, the language is highly technical. I'm not in a position to mend it, but would venture that it compares poorly with the US

Chapter 11 article from a general reader's POV. Thanx for reading xx Pufferfyshe (talk

) 22:33, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Origin

This article was orignally part of a general article "Administration", most of which related to Business Administration. For the history of editors whose contributions formed this article, please see the history page for

Concrete Cowboy

18:26, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Material that follows was in original talk and repasted here. --

Concrete Cowboy

18:04, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Administration of an insolvent business

In this article, we have a section on the administration of an insolvent business. Is this the same thing as
administrative receivership, for which there is another article? If so, should the two articles be linked? Or is there a subtle difference? DWaterson
18:38, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Yes, I agree. I'll merge them. --
Concrete Cowboy
20:44, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

No, they are not the same things. They are in fact completely different. An administrative receiver is an officer appointed by the holder of a
chapter 11. They are polar opposites. I will do a quick fix the article, but administration of a failing company is a complex topic, and probably deserves its own article. Legis
08:49, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Legis - there is an article for
administrative receivership, you may want to have a look at it. Burbidget
22:38, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Contradiction

I placed a {{

Administrative receivership? --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk

) 13:48, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Merge

As I understand it, the article stub at

Administration (insolvency)

.

If my understanding is correct, I think it will be helpful to readers if we include the text of the stub as a sub-section of the Administration (insolvency) article.

--Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 13:53, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

An administration order, in terms of county court personal debt, is nothing to do with company administration. johnnybriggs (talk) 23:13, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

That is good to know. Could you update the

Administration Order article with this information? --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk

) 05:40, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Illiterate rubbish

This article is so poorly written, parts of it make no sense.86.145.1.49 (talk) 07:22, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

So what does it mean?

It's a bit hard to gather from the article just what it actually means for a company to go into administration. kestasjk (talk) 11:17, 8 October 2010 (UTC)