Talk:Amber Valley (UK Parliament constituency)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
WikiProject iconPolitics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconDerbyshire Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThe article on Amber Valley (UK Parliament constituency) is supported by the Derbyshire WikiProject, which is a collaborative effort to improve the quality and coverage of Derbyshire-related articles on Wikipedia.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconElections and Referendums
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.

Two candidate names haven't got citations

Stuart Bent and Kate Smith need sources to back up the fact that they are candidates in the election. Probably genuine, need to get the citations. Will come back ASAP and have a looksie. Senotshtooms (talk) 14:14, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Senotshtooms: They're genuine. All you needed to do was check the BBC web site - here's the entry for Amber Valley. --Redrose64 (talk) 15:23, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Amber Valley (UK Parliament constituency). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:26, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]