Talk:America's Next Top Model season 23

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Television: Top Model Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Top Model task force.

The episode names should NOT be italicized, they should be regular like every other season, like I had it before. So please change it back. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.190.153.14 (talk • contribs) 23:35, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done Per

Linguist ^Moi? Moi. 00:04, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

"Cody Wells and Tash Wells are identical twins, but they competed individually." It seems odd to me that we include this, has there ever been a case where twins have competed as one entity? It pretty much has no point. I've also noticed people make the same note for siblings competing in the same season, but it seems silly. If there were cousins would we write "x and y are first cousins once removed."? I guesss my point is to delete that ridiculous bit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:241:8502:B67B:5199:EE55:5B01:A702 (talk) 09:40, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to second this. The note that they are identical twins is fine, but the note that they competed individually is rather silly, as it implies that there has ever been an instance where two people have competed as one entity on this show or any of its iterations around the world, which has in fact never happened. 04:26, 9 January 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.6.128.216 (talk)

In episode 4, Marissa was called before Kyle. The table has it that Kyle was called before Marissa. Could someone please change that please? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1008:B161:6635:74B6:40A4:3583:C21 (talk) 02:01, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please provide

Linguist ^Moi? Moi. 04:01, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

How about rewatch the episode and watch the call out at the end and you'll see it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1008:B161:6635:74B6:40A4:3583:C21 (talk) 12:23, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In episode two the call out order was edited to make it seem like Cherish was called before Krislian but in reality Krislian was called before Cherish. Should the call-out table be edited? VietPride10 (talk) 01:59, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No, because an edit in a call-out order may constitute a change of mind of the judges. All the other COO tables use call-outs that were aired. Also, please don't post links to copyright-infringing sources. Thank you.

Linguist ^Moi? Moi.

02:30, 5 January 2017 (UTC

Ok, that is simply conjecture that it "may constitute a change of mind of judges", but whatever. Also, I see you asking for reliable source/evidence but when i share a link on the TALK page, you act very condescending about it. VietPride10 (talk) 03:03, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't mean to condescend, but Wikipedia has a very strict policy about copyrights (the relevant policy is

Linguist ^Moi? Moi. 18:41, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

I'm not expressing an opinion as to whether or not it should be changed, but I would like to note that in Episode 3 as aired, Cherish herself says she was in the bottom three at the previous panel, which does seem to give further credence — and evidence directly put forth by the show itself — to Krislian being called before her at that panel. I am unclear in such a situation, where the source itself gives direct contradictory evidence, how to proceed, but it would seem reasonable to include a note on the discrepancy with the call-out table. 04:24, 9 January 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.6.128.216 (talk)

This America's Next Top Model (cycle 23) has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

|Giah Hardeman |21 |

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format.

Linguist ^Moi? Moi. 19:41, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Semi-protected edit request on 1 February 2017

This America's Next Top Model (cycle 23) has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Wikic7 (talk) 09:10, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. DRAGON BOOSTER ★ 09:39, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I propose to semi protect this article in order to prevent further vandalism. WP:RFP Vivid17 (talk) 09:52, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone who has the rights to edit take out the part where it says India was the first winner of the show to get 5 first call outs? It was Ann Ward of cycle 15 who got it first. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.4.143.58 (talk) 19:58, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why can't the cycle 23 semis have a part in the contestants section? They technically competed on the show in the first episode, and it's not like we don't know some of them. Literally all 14 girls are identified save for two surnames (Brittany & Caitlyn) and ages and hometowns can be easily found as well. Other versions like Brazil have the semifinalists in a section. It doesn't make any sense. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ratherbe2000 (talk • contribs) 22:18, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is a move discussion in progress on