Talk:Apollo Justice: Ace Attorney/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

The criteria

  1. Well-written:
    (a) the prose is clear and the spelling and grammar are correct; and
    (b) it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, jargon, words to avoid, fiction, and list incorporation.
  2. Factually accurate and verifiable:
    (a) it provides references to all sources of information, and at minimum contains a section dedicated to the attribution of those sources in accordance with the guide to layout;
    (b) at minimum, it provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons; and
    (c) it contains no original research.
  3. Broad in its coverage:
    (a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and
    (b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
  4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias.
  5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day-to-day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
  6. Illustrated, if possible, by images:
    (a) images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
    (b) images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.

I'll get back to this in a bit. VX!talk 05:20, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Stuff you might want to consider changing:

Ending statements and criteria backtrack

  1. Well-written:
    (a) the prose is clear and the spelling and grammar are correct; and
    (b) it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, jargon, words to avoid, fiction, and list incorporation.
  2. Factually accurate and verifiable:
    (a) it provides references to all sources of information, and at minimum contains a section dedicated to the attribution of those sources in accordance with the guide to layout;
    (b) at minimum, it provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons; and
    (c) it contains no original research.
  3. Broad in its coverage:
    (a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and
    (b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). Focused, yet not too much detail
  4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias.
  5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day-to-day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. Stable
  6. Illustrated, if possible, by images: Two images
    (a) images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; and All fair use and appropriately tagged.
    (b) images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. Suitable in this condition (fair use)

If there are any, I'd encourage you to find pd/cc images. However, I doubt any exist.

I believe this article passes the GA criteria, and because of this I am deciding to pass the article.

GA status achieved. VX!talk 01:15, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]