Talk:Bacteria collective motion

Sounds promising. Would it be a new article or an addition to the current "Bacteria" article? I see a "Movement" section there. Do you have enough material to add 750+ words there? (Also, next to Movement, see the "Further information: Chemotaxis, Flagellum, and Pilus" link. Are those topics related/similar? EG

1.Several typos and articles should be checked. And some verbs are in wrong form (pl.). 2. There is a paragraph starting with "in our experiment", which means this is from your experimence. So it is not a good source for wikipedia according to its rules. 3. It is not very complicated to insert references. which can be done by using DOI or http of the paper you used to do so.This will make the draft more readable. YTCAO17 (talk) 23:07, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Starting from general introduction, the article is well-organized and has relevant examples with references. What I want to recommend you is to cite references as a fact not to describe what the researchers have done previously. (This is because it is the article for encyclopedia, not describing that someone has done something. By modifying sentence structure little bit,I am sure that you can deliver the recapped facts. Overall, it is good! hmoon 23:19, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Where are the references? Where you have the numbers (i.e., [1]) click Cite and then put in the information. It should create a "References" list for you at the bottom... Eric WritingMan (talk) 17:52, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]