Talk:Battle Creek Sanitarium

Michigan Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Register of Historic Places Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Seventh-day Adventist Church High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist Church, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Seventh-day Adventist Church on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Seventh-day Adventist ChurchWikipedia:WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist ChurchTemplate:WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist ChurchSeventh-day Adventist Church articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. To-do list: edit history watch purge Expand "Glacier View Controversy" section, to include more background, history, theological issues, and details of the Glacier View meeting itself Add to "Adventist Responses to Criticisms" section, ideally with material from Adventist scholars etc.

Veganism and Vegetarianism Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of veganism and vegetarianism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Veganism and VegetarianismWikipedia:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismTemplate:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismVeganism and Vegetarianism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The contents of the Percy Jones Army Hospital page were merged into Battle Creek Sanitarium on August 11, 2012. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

This article talks a great deal about in what principles the thing is based what what who did, but, amazingly, it does not say "what it is", which is what I wanted to know. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.224.139.156 (talk) 12:54, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why are we using the middle of the three names that this organisation has, why not use the final one and reference the other two. It is most popularly known by its last name, the Battle Creek Sanitarium. Ansell 01:03, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what you mean by the "middle of the three names", but sanatorium is the spelling Kellogg (and the institution) used, and evidently the somewhat idiosyncratic spelling was deliberately chosen.

There's no link between Battle Creek and Sanitarium Foods. They are not even in the same country. Until more sufficient evidence is placed into the article, I'm removing the link. --Ummel (talk) 15:06, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For the connection, read here. -- Htra0497 (talk) 04:06, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

..which is now here.

I've been working for what seems like hours and it doesn't look like I've done much at all. I've started by sourcing the 2003 dedication. Then details of those named, moved paragraghs, headings, added Depression, U.S. Government, etc. Clearly a heading for Buildings or Structures is needed so I put in the heading with no material, although the Michigan Center for Geographic Information. http://www.mcgi.state.mi.us/hso/sites/3310.htm has some material. I did my first reference and I think it is correct. It looks O.K. to me. ^[1] I totally agree with Ansell: its weird to use just one, even though best known, name. Does anyone think that since it is now a government complex, after a short spell as an army hospital, that it should also be labeled as a "stub" for that category? Elisevil (talk) 06:22, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I propose merging this article with

I'm inclined to oppose. The current federal center encompasses many more buildings than the sanitarium -- and some portions of what was the sanitarium are gone. Much of the content of the sanitarium article is irrelevant in the context of an article about a current federal center. If a merge were to occur, it should be from the federal center to the sanitarium article. The sanitarium has greater long-term significance. older ≠ wiser 14:27, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge is the wrong word I think. There should be one page for the federal center, that contains the information relates to the current building and the history of the complex. As there is an expansive article on the portion of the history relating to the sanitarium, and that is the most historically significant, most of the information related to the history of the sanitarium the information related to buildings that do not exist anymore should be removed from the Federal Center, and a link given to find more information. Also this means that most of the information related to the history of the center before and after the sanitarium opened and closed should refer to the federal center page, until the time that more specific documents are written on this topic.66.146.195.82 (talk) 22:05, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Battle Creek Sanitarium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110606132412/http://www.mcgi.state.mi.us/hso/sites/3310.htm to http://www.mcgi.state.mi.us/hso/sites/3310.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140407082420/http://www.willard.lib.mi.us/historical/bcphotos/bcsanitarium/ to http://www.willard.lib.mi.us/historical/bcphotos/bcsanitarium/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929082610/http://www.amtamassage.org/journal/fall04_journal/AlookBack.pdf to http://www.amtamassage.org/journal/fall04_journal/AlookBack.pdf#search='Battle%20Creek%20Sanitarium'/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:55, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Battle Creek Sanitarium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140407082420/http://www.willard.lib.mi.us/historical/bcphotos/bcsanitarium/ to http://www.willard.lib.mi.us/historical/bcphotos/bcsanitarium/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150709080850/http://www.dispositionservices.dla.mil/pubaff/Pages/USArmyhospital.aspx to http://www.dispositionservices.dla.mil/pubaff/Pages/USArmyhospital.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:01, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is the large building currently located on the site - at N Washington Ave. and Sanitarium Ave. - the same structure as the 1903 rebuilt sanitarium? Elsquared (talk) 02:53, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]