Talk:Bipartisan Cafe/GA1

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Voorts (talk · contribs) 22:02, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Review to come.

@Another Believer: Excellent work. Just a few comments:

• Refs 55 looks like it's for the wrong restaurant.
  • Fixed. Good catch! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 01:41, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• The history section should be reorganized chronologically and the subsections removed.
  • I've tried to address your concern. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 01:41, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• I think the section on Emerson's views should be removed and relevant
  WP:PROSESIZE
  ). If Emerson himself is notable, he should get his own article where his views can be described.
  • I've tried to address your concern. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 01:41, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• I also don't think there's a great reason to separate out newspapers from other RSes that have reviewed the restaurant in the reception section. Although not necessary for GA, I think that section can also be reorganized a bit (perhaps thematically), and some of the block quotes can be paraphrased down.
  • I've tried to address your concern. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 01:41, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Not necessary for GA, but I fixed a bunch of refs during my edit. Make sure you're including author names and following
  MOS:CONFORMTITLE
  .

Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 23:34, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 01:41, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]