Talk:Born to Try (album)

This article was nominated for deletion on June 20, 2007. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

The Sydney Herald messed it up. December 2006 is technically considered Winter 2007. Winter 2006 is January and February. The release date is February 28th, I'm telling you. And, use some logic, who would release a new artist's album in December during all of the Christmas activity? It would get lost and not perform well. 66.66.245.85 23:53, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It was an honest mistake. Please correct the information, but don't be dismissive of others by telling them to "use some logic." Read

WP:DICK. Mike H. That's hot 02:18, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

Well, I apologize, but in my eyes it makes total sense that something relatively unknown would be released in the Holiday season. The SMH article was misleading. And, I would correct the information, but people would just change it back like they did the last time. I tried to provide a source, but people dismiss it as not reliable. Like I said at my user talk page, a user at the official Delta Goodrem forums [1] posted that it would be released in February, on the 28th. I also provided proof that she had connections with Sony BMG and Columbia and posted the tracklisting before it was officially released on the official USA website. [2] Since then I found this clip from a Parade magazine that says it will be released in February [3]...that is, unless it is pushed back again. Again, my apologies. I'd like to discuss it first and agree on a good timeframe to put down since nobody ever seems to be sure when it is coming out. Even her MySpace says January 24 as the release. 66.66.245.85 03:39, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What does a "US Mix" mean? I've heard her songs and there isn't anything about the lyrics that makes them hard to understand for Americans — rather straightforward, really. So why is it being done and what's really the difference between "US" and "Australian" mixes? Mike H. That's hot 05:21, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's basically just instrumental differences. It's a lot more noticeable in Lost Without You than it is in Born To Try, but each one is different from the original version. Lyrically, there is only one minor difference in Lost Without You. Not Me, Not I is apparently just an instrumental difference as well. 66.66.245.85 03:23, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, In lost without you the choruses are just mixed around. Think about it though, she was so much younger when she recorded the songs originally! She has had to learn to sing again practically after cancer and her voice is TOTALLY different. The songs have new meanings to her now so she re-recorded them. They just changed the melodies slghtly. By mix they basically just change it a little - they dont really change words or anything.--Banana.girl 12:37, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm thinking this date is not that legit either. There has been no publicity for this album. Mike H. That's hot 23:22, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm confused, here [4] on a Japanese HMV it shows Innocent Eyes not Born to Try. Lillygirl 5:23, 2 September 2006.