Talk:Broadcasting and the foundation of the Premier League/GA1

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 14:50, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this against the GA criteria as part of a GAN sweep. I'll leave some comments soon. JAGUAR  14:50, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguations: No links found.

Checking against the GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (

   lists

   ):

   "a company formed by the merger of Rupert Murdoch's Sky Television and British Satellite Broadcasting" - did Murdoch own British Satellite Broadcasting? This sentence makes it sound like he owned both anyway

   "but their case was thrown out of the High Court" - link High Court of Justice

   "Arsenal, Aston Villa, Everton, Leeds United, Liverpool" - link

   Leeds United

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (

   reliable sources): c (OR

   ):

   No original research found.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

I couldn't find any issues with this article when reading through it. It is comprehensive, well written and well sourced. Since it meets the criteria, I see no reason to put this on hold. Nice work JAGUAR  19:40, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]