Talk:Cara Cunningham/Archive 6

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

←

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Archive 8

Archive 9

This is not a reliable source, and should not be used alone. It cannot be used alone because YouTube censor many 'channels' they believe viewers may find offensive, e.g. Pat Condell. As the order is always changing, instead of updating it constantly, you are better of saying 'RandomYouTuber is one of the top 100 most subscribed to users.'--Seriousspender (talk) 19:46, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

If we have a source that YouTube's own ranking aren't accurate for their channels then we could potentially include that. It's likely that anyone else's reporting of the same information would also lean on YouTube's information so the time being I think it's fair to consider them the authority. On wikipedia we're suppose to date the information, for example as of January 2008 this is the ranking, and we have done that. Even if the updating is never done again it's accurate of that date. It would be more potent to state he's been in the top 20 channels since such and such date so I'll look into that possibility.

Benjiboi

00:01, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

In thinking about it YouTube's ranking are only snapshots so until they show, or someone develops a chant of progress or someone publishes that information I think we should stay with where we are at. If he starts to go down in the rankings we could note his highest position and date that.

Benjiboi

17:51, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

{{

}} Apparently the article has been protected again even though it was denied at RPP yesterday. So would an admin put the notice on the article that it is indeed protected please? Better yet, take it off of protection since the main problem user has now been blocked for 3 months. ✰ALLSTAR✰ ^echo 03:55, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

It was blocked yesterday (January 20) for edit warring. Not done. --MZMcBride (talk) 05:17, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Like I said, the problem is gone for 3 months so there won't be any more edit warring. ✰ALLSTAR✰ ^echo 05:19, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

I've re-requested unblock. Admin's please check talk page for

00:23, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

• YouTube.com/ChrisCrockerResponds

The above site doesn't make any sense and I think it's a spoof or fake of some sort.

20:45, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

If it wasn't his, how could he be in the videos on it? That doesn't make sense.

talk

) 21:02, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

What an idiot. ^

He's one of the biggest Youtube vloggers and his videos are constantly being reposted for various reasons by others who are not him.

Benjiboi

21:20, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

I don't understand why 7 of his videos are listed there, why not mention them all? They don't seem anymore notable than 'LEAVE BRITNEY ALONE'. Unless they have been mentioned by sources.--Seriousspender (talk) 22:32, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Per prior discussion the selected filmography has been purposefully been limited to those with at least a million views and those mentioned by sources. These also got those million-plus views prior to the "Leave Britney Alone" video so also demonstrate that he had quite a following as an internet celeb prior to the big splash. It's likely others of his videos have reached beyong the million mark as well but I honestly feel that the ones we've included give a reasonable overview of his 60-70-plus videos that we know of; we cover the material dispassionately and site our sources in accordance with policies on

Benjiboi

00:20, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Forgot to mention, he's a vlogger, this is what he does and is known for, an author has their books listed, an actor has their works listed, etc.

Benjiboi

01:11, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

What so your going to keep checking all his videos until they have 1million views so you can add them? I think only ones with real sources should be mentioned.--Seriousspender (talk) 07:44, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

As noted above most of them do have sources and all of them have met the above threshold prior to the "Leave Britney Alone" video that made him more internationally known. No, I'm not "going to keep checking all his videos" to see if and when some other move beyond the million-views mark (several more have, I believe). Please also see

Benjiboi

22:23, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

You are good at assuming bad faith, maybe I was not aware of the sources policy? And maybe I wanted the article to stay relevant and not end up being filled with unencyclopedic/unverifiable fancruft? Quality > Quantity? I have removed the video 'Britney, this is for you.' as 2million views and x amount of comments is not a reason for it to be notable.--Seriousspender (talk) 14:40, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

As are you. And your actions to again remove videos and diminish his notability are again noted.

Benjiboi

22:57, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

You might also note that we didn't include some of his other videos even though they were discussed in secondary sources as they didn't seem that important compared to the rest.

Benjiboi

22:59, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

please delete.... Smosh's video-conogrify got deleted so this (and most of Leave Britney Alone) should be deleted or its unfair for smosh! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.47.134.10 (talk) 13:13, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

boi

18:34, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

If any of these become more notable we can re-explore their inclusion.

22:56, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

• Chris Crocker - Nose pickin'. (posted May 29, 2007 to YouTube).^[1] Crocker let's people that don't like nose picking, know what he thinks about it. The video has been viewed over 185,000 times and has received over 1100 comments as of September 2007.^[1]

spoofvideo of incest with "brother" Scotty

Chris Crocker screws his own brother ,he admits it ! - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nw6fTMb7MGg

Chris Crocker Kisses His Brother? - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qOWjMsEkvq0

chris crocker incest with his brother - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9iuu_j67I2U

• brotherly Love. (posted September 3, 2007 to _______). DESCRIPTION HERE. "We talk about his boyfriends ("At least I got to use him as a prop for a while," he says of a recent one, who pretended to be Chris's brother in a video spoof on gay-brother incest"^[2]

• The Earl Annie Edna show! (posted February 25, 2007 to YouTube).

The Earl Annie Edna show! - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tfpP2k85nw8

The Earl Annie Edna show! - http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&VideoID=5034937

Feb 25 Earl Annie Edna pt.2 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XuA75dY_z8k

Earl Annie Edna pt.2 - http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&VideoID=5069094

Feb 25 Earl Annie Edna pt.3 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GsZzxBT3EJM

Feb 26 Earl Annie Edna's intervention. - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t3yjI9kBIy8

Feb 26 Earl Annie Edna's announcement! - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bTedili3ldk ^[2]

Edutainer? Give me a break. Somebody get that crappy little piece of newspeak out of this article, mkay? TIA

It's a quote and correctly attributed as same, you'll also note it's wikiliked to

jiboi

02:21, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Who is it a quote from? It doesn't seem to be in either of the references that follow it. DJ Clayworth (talk) 21:06, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

From Crocker, I believe it was on his MySpace page which he now lists himself as "professional enlightener / preacher". The refs have been moved and vandalized so it probably got just removed or moved in one of the many edits. I'll re-add the dated MySpace page and another ref.

boi

22:10, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

We don't generally take people's words for what they are without adding "self-described" or some such qualifier. I'll do that. DJ Clayworth (talk) 14:15, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

It actually used to state that but prior discussion was that quotes were fine, I'm not bothered either way.

boi

18:21, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

wow, thats great. 'keeps his location secret because of death threats. oh and by the way he lives in los angeles, california'. whats the freakin point of putting that in there? HES a hUMAMN BEIGNG —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.198.19.169 (talk) 11:51, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

That's a good point. I added the information myself as Crocker himself has stated it on his homepage. I will also note that I expect that he may reveal his identity or it will be reported in RS soon as he is near legal age and he seems to have now re-located from his homestate where threats and violence were apparently an everyday reality to Los Angeles where the paparazzi are the bigger issue. I will also note that we will still stick with policy on revealing the same information as we have done before.

boi

20:54, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

In fact, this was always a bit of a crock, as other parts of Wikipedia listed his real name and where he lived all along.--209.202.70.226 (talk) 19:27, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Really, I can't say that I'm aware of that. Do you have any examples?

boi

23:05, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

I must retract this, as the reference in question was removed at the end of November. Additionally, my memory was in error in stating that the article used his real name (although it can easily be found on Google)--209.202.70.226 (talk) 20:47, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

No problem! Thanks for checking back!

boi

21:59, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Why is there no mention of this? it has attracted considerable attention.JTBX (talk) 01:39, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

This has been discussed here quite a few times actually, the "brother" in question was actually his boyfriend at the time. Personally I thought the video was clever and wished he hadn't removed it. If you see a reliable source referencing this it might be worth mentioning.

boi

01:57, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Link to pt:wiki should be removed, as this article doesn't exist there anymore. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.44.19.200 (talk) 15:05, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

There is a photo on Polish version of chris Crocker wiki, maybe it can be used here http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2d/Chris_Crocker.jpg —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.19.193.246 (talk) 10:22, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Yes, we had that one but it was deleted off as unfree. We'll hopefully get a replacement photo.

boi

02:40, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

This guy isn't worthy of a wikipedia page. He doesn't rate a mention in a big book of time wasters. Internet Celebritys don't rate encyclopedia archiving. So, yay or nay? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.60.226.203 (talk) 04:40, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Yes, please. - 99.251.96.66 (talk) 22:17, 22 March 2008

Agreed 100% he wrote it himself. get a life (UTC)

You could try but I think it would fail quickly under

boi

23:20, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Also

boi

23:22, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Yes, please84.152.127.132 (talk) 16:26, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

For what my opinion is worth, I think that the whole Chris Crocker phenomenon chould be boiled down to a sentence or two on the Britney Spears page, with a link to Youtube. Aside from that one incident, there's not really anything noteworthy enough to be worth chronicling here. As time goes by, this becomes more and more apparent.--Wee Charlie (talk) 16:58, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Your opinion is totally valid but wikipedia policies suggest that the article and Crocker's notability remain even if he never does anything else.

boi

21:02, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

An article, fine, it's huge for someone who is basically known for one Youtube vid. Possibly it should be trimmed? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.58.120.11 (talk) 05:16, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

His worldwide fame indeed came from the one video but his notability was apprent prior to and post that video as well. Even he stated he wished that wasn't the way he became known to the whole world but it's simply the most famous of the now 80-90 videos he's published and we seem to emphasize that in the article.

boi

01:52, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Any "internet celebrity" doesn't deserve a wiki page. Mostly because they are really only famous on that, the internet. Mention Crocker in one of two sentences on Spear's page and get this out of here. He wastes enough memory on the internet with his dumb videos, then theres this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.60.226.203 (talk) 07:38, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

I second, He is a internet celebrity. Such Celebrities should be merged into one page. Crying about Britney Spears should not make a person famous. This guy is basically famous for not deserving to be famous, we should not be encouraging that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mattcruise (talk • contribs) 03:32, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

He did make headlines not just in the United State but also most of the Worlds News outlets (Not just the internet but newspapers and TV). Bidgee (talk) 03:44, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Is he a trans

Why does he have that long blond hair and wear all that makeup and girls' clothes? —Preceding unsigned comment added by PatrickJ83 (talk • contribs) 23:29, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Generously we could say he's extremely in touch with his femininity. He hasn't indicated a disposition for being transgender.

boi

01:53, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

I'm gonna be bold and remove this in the lead paragraph. My reasoning, as I stated in the edit summary, is that (for example) Jon Stewart's article doesn't start off by naming him as a Jewish straight male. Cheers, Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP! :)} 01:25, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

OK, I now at least see what you meant by your edit summary. If everything Jon Stewart published and talked about was about being Jewish would that maybe sway your opinion? Because seemingly everything Crocker says and publishes is about being an openly gay kid; arguably this might change as he grows older, or maybe tired of this recurring theme, but even Madonna and Britney seem sex-focused likely because sex sells as a hot-button topic. Crocker seems to be trying to get attention so he can talk about various issues and he odd appeal coupled with sexual overtones seems to be working. There's a new five second-long vid of his where he simply blinks twice while staring into the camera. It's been viewed nearly two million times. He's a character and his sexuality seems to be worn on the sleeve.

boi

01:58, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Update. OK, I've moved this to the following sentence to help address this concern and more conform to

boi

14:57, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

he said on MySpace that he would be making one with his boyfriend anyone hear anything about this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.235.132.245 (talk) 01:22, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

To be fair, since this article appears to almost overwhelmingly pro-Crocker, it should be noted that the infamous video currently has a rating of only 2 out of 5 stars on youtube. Aaron Bowen (talk) 02:06, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

The Screenshot is 2 times in the article. Could someone please delete the unnecessary photo? thx --77.189.180.43 (talk) 11:20, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Y Done ➪HiDrNick! 16:08, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

should the allegations of incest and the apparent shock video in which he kisses his own brother on you tube be mentioned.Myheartinchile (talk) 00:03, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Probably not. It's not that notable and is no longer hosted by Crocker himself, he removed it so any copies are posted in violation of YouTube's guidelines. It was a hoax and a bunch of people believed it but it's not that big of deal as of yet. `

boi

00:16, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

are you sure it was a hoax?Myheartinchile (talk) 00:59, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Yes. In a reliable source he states it was his boyfriend at that time who was in the video with him.

boi

01:06, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

That's not the half of what he was doing with his sister, Betty. I tell ya, man, she was cooking. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 01:31, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

is the bitch please video mentioned in the article. it has over 5 million hits.[1]Myheartinchile (talk) 00:12, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Already in article.

boi

00:16, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

is it really supposed to be purple? or is that just a style thing. I thought it was supposed to be gray or whitish, like on other celebrity infoboxes and that only language and species articles had a color coded system.Myheartinchile (talk) 00:12, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

All infoboxes have their own style/color, Crocker's is an Internet celebrity infobox and they are purple.

boi

00:18, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

If Chris Crocker got "crock-blocked" from Hyde on December 7th, on his birthday, (as he himself confirmed to TMZ), then why does it say on here that he was born on December 2nd?

If there is a reliable source stating his birthday is something else then link it here so we can sort out how best to treat it, generally we need something definitive like "Crocker's birthday is ______" (giving month and day). If it's too ambiguous it doesn't really help.

boi

23:58, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

the tone of this article is clearly bias and in favor of the subject. The color of the infobox, the non mentioning of his hometown, the dubious pipelink to clarksville, tn. The tone is very cavalier and unencylopedic.Myheartinchile (talk) 07:17, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Sorry but what does a color of an infobox got to do with a POV? Bidgee (talk) 07:35, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Answer? Nothing. Infobox colors are not customized by article.

boi

01:32, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

His name and location have been left off, for now at least due to the near-daily death threats against him. If and when a reliable source reveals this information per

WP:Lede

we are supposed to summarize criticism in context so i would support re-adding some of it back in. Here is essentially what I had put in before:

“

Crocker's detractors and critics have accused him of melodramatics,[64] histrionics,[20] and using Spears' personal shortcomings to bolster his own fame;[65][66] Others have accused Crocker of acting in the "Leave Britney Alone" video,[67] although he insisted that it was a genuine "blog from the heart" on a 20 September 2007 appearance on the Maury Povich show.[68][10]

”

I would support moving this paragraph back up into the lede as I feel it fairly summarizes the main criticisms.

boi

01:32, 7 June 2008 (UTC)