Talk:Case studies of Brown-Sequard syndrome

This article was nominated for deletion on 9 February 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

A deletion tag was added claiming that this was original research. As is obvious from the refs this is not the case. Therefore removed the tag.--

This is not a typical page for Wikipedia. But I think it still appropriate. We do have other similar pages such as

talk · contribs · email) 18:28, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

I disagree on the appropriateness. It is basically a list of case reports, supported by a large bag of unformatted references that would take weeks to sort out. It is original research in the sense that these case reports were not previously published; I therefore find it strange that you removed the PROD. At any rate, it is on AFD now. The author would have done better to place it on Wikibooks or publish it in a genuine open-source peer reviewed journal. JFW | T@lk 19:29, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

All these cases are have been reported and published in peer reviewed journals of international circulation. It is incorrect to say these are original research. The original articles can easily be retrieved by typing them into google or other search engine. A E Francis (talk) 19:50, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This page now directs back to the Brown-Séquard syndrome article. This way, the content is available in the page history for retrieval and transwikification, which is the only right conclusion of the AFD. Content of this type simply tramples