Talk:Cave Diving Group

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
WikiProject iconCaves
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Caves, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of caving and cave articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.

Fair use rationale for Image:Cdg logo.jpg

fair use
.

Please go to

Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

talk) 23:57, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

R-organisation

This article was originally copied verbatim (as far as I can see) from the CDG website which is copyrighted. I have removed the note: Written by J Buxton and taken from the CDG site.

So far I have split the article into sections, but there is still much to do. Most noticeably, some of the material is perhaps more appropriate to other articles such as Cave diving, or biographies. It needs to be wikified. Most importantly it needs to be written with emphasis on the CDG, and not get side tracked into other issues. I will return and make further edits, but this subject is outside my area of expertise, so please feel free to jump in and make corrections and further improvements. Derek Andrews (talk) 21:07, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm seriously considering reporting this article for copyright violation. A whole bunch of text is lifted directly from here. Despite toning down some of the peacock language a lot of it reads like an advert for the CDG. Any opinions? --TimTay (talk) 08:01, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Hi Timtay >for copyright violation

I original copied it in from the CDG site just to put some thing in under an existing title, I am a member of the CDG as well as a member of the central committee of the CDG. In that respect I can use the material although I did mention it to CC and no objection was made.

I am editor of the CDG Lot and Dordogne cave guide (www.lot46.com) as well as co-editor of the CDG manual http://www.cavedivinggroup.org.uk/Zen-CDG/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=5&products_id=43&zenid=4675ae632067e04fee650bfa9a99f7b1

If it reads like an advert it was not intended by John B if people are unhappy with it then I will remove the CDG derived text.



Andrew



Good to hear from a fellow biker! If you have permission to re-use the content then there is no copyright violation. It would be nice to try to maintain a neutral point of view though. Keep up your work on the article and I'll do what I can to assist. --TimTay (talk) 18:43, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]


No problem, although the work seems to be well under way after my initial efforts.

All the best Andrew —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.105.221.86 (talk) 10:26, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]


.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cave Diving Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:36, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]