Talk:Chemokine

Assessment comment - 2008

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Chemokine/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following

several discussions in past years

, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

I've added a column for the receptor in the table of chemokines and started filling in some of them, but there are too many for me to do now. As an immunology researcher, I cannot stress how immensely useful having such a table readily available would be, as the nomenclature is incredibly confusing. - 7 September 2008‎ 68.184.207.68

I removed "[The picture to the right looks like a picture of an MHC molecule, not a chemokine. Can someone with more knowledge than me confirm this? Alternatively, readers should please be aware that the accuracy of the picture may be in question.]"

This is indeed the structure of interleukin-8, although, the structure does resemble that of an MHC. See http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/mmdb/mmdbsrv.cgi?uid=53522 for more information. - 20 April 2008‎ 207.112.122.166

Last edited at 22:39, 7 September 2008 (UTC).

Substituted at 11:25, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chemokine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

Sourcecheck

}}).

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:15, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not all receptor/ligand pairing shown in table

CCR4 says it has 5 : CCL2, CCL4, CCL5, and the two shown : CCL17, and CCL22. - Rod57 (talk) 02:42, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]