Talk:Cocoon (Björk song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
WikiProject iconIceland Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Iceland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Iceland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconSongs
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
WikiProject iconWomen in Music
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Fair use rationale for Image:Bjorkcocoon.jpg

fair use
.

Please go to

Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

talk) 05:31, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Fair use rationale for Image:CocoonSShot.JPG

fair use
.

Please go to

Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

talk) 21:20, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Covers

I've changed the covers of place because the cover 2 is the official cover used in Björk's official webpage. --Quaveren (talk) 18:40, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is . The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: CaliforniaDreamsFan (talk · contribs) 03:18, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, my name is CaliforniaDreamsFan, and I'll be reviewing your article! Full review coming soon, so stay tuned

Infobox

  • Add an alt to the cover.
  • Not being nerdy, but I know that "Cocoon" has more than one artwork, so add a caption that defines the cover you've added.
I think it fails
WP:NFCC#8
  • Again, not being nerdy, but "Cocoon" also serves a digital release, so add that in the formats.
  • Remove certification part.

Lead section

  • "Björk set to make a record with a domestic mood" — current tense in comparison to "inspired by the work of....". Say something like "Inspired by her relationship with artist Matthew Barney, Björk wanted to make a record with a domestic mood."
  • Remove "a song" after lyrically.
  • It's good that you've added charting performances of the UK and Spain, but there are two extra charts here in the article. Say something like, "It experienced moderate commercial success in record charts in the United Kingdom, Australia, and France, but reached the top 10 in Spain."

Background

  • I don't see the relevance of this section on the article or about the song. It would make sense for the parent album or the lead single from the record cause it briefly explains the "background" of the entire session, but this the third release, so I don't get why it's here. You could probably mention it briefly int he development section, but it doesn't really work with the article.

Development

  • Add a reference after the quote of the producer.
  • "They met up in January 2001 in London to record the song at Olympic Studios." — Any references? You could add a AV media notes reference here (for CD releases, etc.)
  • For further statements, if you have any other quoted sentences, make sure there is a reference at the end.
  • Who describes the "kind of rough" recording? Bjork or Knak?
  • The rest is well-written!

Composition

  • Apart from Bjork, is there any publication or critic(s) that describe the track as glitch music?
  • As mentioned above, if you have any other quoted sentences, make sure there is a reference at the end.
  • Everything else is well written!

Reception

  • Say something broad about the commercial success at the start of the second paragraph, such as "It experienced moderate commercial success in record charts in the United Kingdom, Australia, and France, but reached the top 10 in Spain."
I think a more detailed sentence about the charts is good to the article, by the way
  • Who describes it as "One of Björk's most avant-garde music videos"? Define this please.
  • Again, who says that it was "as controversial as the "Pagan Poetry" music video"? Define this.
  • Who considered it "polemic"?
  • The rest is fine!

Track listing

  • Change title to "Track listings and formats"
  • I'm not trying to be nerdy yet again, but I'm pretty sure there are a couple more track lists of the single release (a major factor of being covered with part 3 of WP:GA criteria.
  • Split it into two divided columns.

Credits

  • Identify the recording whereabouts, other notes if neccesary, etc.
  • Split it into two divided columns.

References

  • Make sure your usage of dates are consistent (I see some going Date Month Year, then Month Date, Year).

External links

  • I see a reference of the song on Bjork's website; add it here as well since its pretty specific a vital of the track itself.

Overall GA conclusion

A really good article! On hold for 7 days for additional editing. Please ping me for any inquires or when you have finished! Good luck CaliforniaDreamsFan (talk · contribs} 03:45, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

All  Done, thanks for the review @CaliforniaDreamsFan:. Alex talk 23:37, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Passing! CaliforniaDreamsFan (talk · contribs} 03:53, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.