Talk:D2X (source port)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move debate was do not move. --Muchness 22:25, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Descent II D2X → D2X – {I think that the current

• Oppose Don't see the difference in relevance. The Descent II D2X entry has all of two lines. Care to elaborate? ~ trialsanderrors 22:28, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose the Nikon D2X is much more notable. If you know anything about photography, you'd know this instantly. 132.205.94.75 01:50, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Add any additional comments

Something to note in the request is that the D2X project is called D2X and not Descent II D2X, so that should also be considered, this is the whole reason I'm making this request. --ReCover 19:11, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, to avoid confusion with the more notable Nikon D2X, I suggest moving this page to D2X Project (per the official site) or D2X (source port). --Muchness 05:39, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I agree

unsigned comment was added by ReCover (talk • contribs

) 08:53, 20 May 2006.

See

Help:Moving a page for info on how to move pages. --Muchness 22:25, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply

]