Talk:DNA sequencing

Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Genetics task force (assessed as Top-importance).
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the Computational Biology task force (assessed as High-importance).

Neuroscience Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

DNA sequencing received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 360 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present.

If this is possible that a DNA strand can be copied by tRNA mRNA and create a polypeptide sequence, and we know we can replicate it. over the years I have studied this subject and heard the some where someone is mapping the dna sequence of a human being as the dna is all similar obviously not the same or we would all be carbon copies of each other like the bits that make us tall short different eye colour ect. then why do we insist on hacking people open and mending holes in hearts etc if a sample of tissue can be replicated and grown on a mouse back for example how long will it be that it is a simple thing called copy and paste we use it all the time in computers copy the affected area and past a new bit back in this can be put in the form of an injection or hyper spray and as scar tissue is formed over an area of a wound it’s the body’s way of compensating for the loss of information to that area why can’t we do the same.

Adding images to the different ways of sequencing DNA could really help with understanding how they work. EliasMari (talk) 03:00, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 30 January 2023 and 30 April 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Nanalpr (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Nanalpr (talk) 02:22, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

this section https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNA_sequencing#Microscopy-based_techniques

is sort of clickbaitish: this is a dead method that has never actually worked very well if at all yet posters keep pumping it (not, IMO, hyperbole) editors, can't we do something about this ??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cinnamon colbert (talk • contribs) 17:38, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

this section https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNA_sequencing#Sample_preparation

is really wierd; it just lists robots but comnpanies like Sage Science, Circulomics,etc et are not mentioned — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cinnamon colbert (talk • contribs) 17:54, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]